Felkey

Well, they haven't thus far...

Are you saying your gun is tiny?

Should be interesting for UPN, good luck.

There was a term 5 about them acknowledging Dio as the one true God but we had to scrap that. Next time vanek and I should push harder for it. Hail Dio.

Next time we just perma war until they go bankrupt, sound good? At least then they can have something legitimate to complain about. Would be a nice change of pace.

You're right... So sad... RIP Shamblesphere :'(

Because giving a full 365 days might give IQ enough time to at least fabricate something resembling a real CB for next war

Why, so KT actually has a reason to roll catsby again?

1. Yes. 2. No: things that do not exist are not valid

!@#$ it, sheepy should just delete all of syndisphere

And tbf senry was one of ours till very recently

That depends, will the new leadership make them git gud?

While we're at it why don't we limit the updeclare declare range and say !@#$ it, who needs strategy and planning?

So you're saying this hypothetical coup could be used to destroy NPO from within...

We already have enough Milton logic in this world, don't need more, k, thanks, bye PS: at least you know how quotes work...

No one should ever read a Comrade Milton post, it's not worth the trip down that rabbit hole.

Can we just get to the part where everyone starts yelling NO U and be done with it already?

also... this

BK is below 100k and still dropping Zodiac is at 77k pssst you guys know how to end this

Ummm..... Winning??? I've seriously lost track of what the !@#$ is going on...

Printer says hi

I mean the point we are trying to make is, the longer you stay in and drag it out, the more unpleasant the terms are going to be for you. CKD and TTO peaced out almost instantly so they got incredibly easy terms. Lordy wanted to wait a few weeks, ok fine, but the terms got a bit tougher with us demanding a bail bond of sorts. UPN waited even longer so the terms got tougher once more with infra caps so that they can't just rebuild and be all cozy while we deal with the rest of IQ's stubbornness. If you want to stay in and fight it out even longer, fine that's your choice, but actions have consensuses and you need to be prepared to deal with them because terms are going to continue to get tougher the longer people want to stay in. Is it really any trickier than forcing both sides to basically perma war? I mean, there are those of us that even though we might not agree with your reasoning, we would be accommodating enough to understand it (essentially put ourselves in your shoes) and say "OK, I might not have made that exact choice but that seems reasonable". As for political damage, I think the parties on both sides know where they stand so I'm not sure the damage will be all that much anyways... Furthermore, I even suggested at one point in the peace chat WEEKS AGO that who ever has the logs, redact the names of the people involved to protect confidentiality. However, that was met with another excuse.

Considering you're one of the main leaders in your coalition, perhaps you should pressure them. I mean if it is a legitimate cb, there are many of us who would love to see it and may be accommodating if you gave as an actual reason... But as it stands, even some of the members in your coalition didn't even know what it was beyond "yeah we have a good chance to win this". Which is just further evidence that you are talking out your ass.

So attacking us without cause and trying to get us to publicly sign off on your reasoning without even showing us said reasons is respect. Cool, got it.

Let's be real here, that lack of respect goes both ways.