-
Posts
563 -
Joined
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by katashimon13
-
-
1 minute ago, His Holy Decagon said:
Sort of wild to say that people, and by “people”, I mean maybe… what, 1-7 try hard/sweats are making a whopping potential 8m a day, and we’re wanting to adjust an entire mechanic in the game?
this is sort of why i was asking for data....
why tf should i care
rawr
-
19 minutes ago, Mayor said:
and at 34 cities by time of this post
who me was way ahead of me during OG 23 and me tJest... i was like c20 ? (idr wat they were i can probably find it if u REALLY need it)
i am now... past the botting cheating cheating face in city count and all i did was math.... no ads no baseball no flipping AND i have been forcing free resources/money on new nations against their will
point is..... i havent really focused on growth (or this game) and i have surpassed who me in city count
if they were cheating and wasnt just a person who cant find something better to do with thier time... they would be WAY bigger than me (especially considering the like ~900 day gap of accidentally spawning immortals out of pantheon/npolt/watever where i basically didnt grow)
rawr
- 1
-
15 hours ago, Honored said:
Title thanks!
also with 100% commerce and decent military
the answer is go back down and raid some more
if you insist on growing purely economically then the answer is make raws and sell them
rawr
-
government should have to interact (win hearts and minds) with people in order to "mobilize the troops" regardless if it is economically culturally or militarily
see: politics part of politics and war
should we give alliance leaders direct control over military improvements? units? what else?
yes embargos are not used that much.... and to my knowledge they arent in the api
the management interface for it is bad
this step is way way too far attempting to correct and even IF an option to wholesale control them were to be implemented it should be opt in not opt out 😕
7 hours ago, Prefontaine said:3 Projects
Embargoesfrom what i read you didnt give reason as to why the RoI on this higher tier project is less than the previous 2
why is this the case and please at least keep it in line with the others
(downboat was for embargo... ur used to it xP)
rawr
-
k so to start off... baseball should be futbol lesbirealheer
(i will also accept some fictional orbis game)and secondly why do you not post data on this shit @Prefontaine just throw the data down and we dont have to deal with as much of this nonsense 😕
opinions (with some suggestions)
-
id prefer a like weekly/monthly cap as opposed to a daily cap... IF a cap is going to be implemented at all
- chores are bad
- i do like the diminishing returns model tho maybe tighten that up?
-
i agree it should be a money sink with no real sigificant bonus
-
BUT people that choose to waste stupid amounts of time on a browser game should get a smol kookie
- tbh tho we shouldnt be encouraging people to sit there and click buttons like that
-
BUT people that choose to waste stupid amounts of time on a browser game should get a smol kookie
-
it should benefit smaller nations more than bigger nations
- maybe mario party it up and like give a 5-15% chance to just win against better teams and get higher percentage payouts for beating bigger pplz (not that many pplz would have unmaxed teams)
- pplz like the underdog hype
(mostly) suggestions
- build tips in already
- make it way less clicks to actually play (maybe even just 1 like has been suggested xP)
-
dunno how one would do this... but make it so you cant just put an autoclicker on top of one spot >;3
- maybe tie some rng with some noise and have it pop up somewhere within a square....
- stop making me type in custom names every time
- i lost my train of thought
-
let me sell icecream at
homeall games
rawr
- 1
- 3
-
id prefer a like weekly/monthly cap as opposed to a daily cap... IF a cap is going to be implemented at all
-
7 hours ago, Prefontaine said:
What about a scaled cap?
42.0m and 69m
rawr
- 3
-
13 hours ago, Alex said:
This does already exist, and for this purpose.
id like to appeal some things then xP
rawr
-
we are all rose
rawr
-
On 6/3/2022 at 1:32 AM, Autumn Annayah said:
stuff
we had this discussion a couple months ago 😧
rawr
-
On 5/2/2022 at 2:58 PM, Prefontaine said:
to get the easier to code content out first
later
ty for trying
also finally but also like... pay the pplz that make it better
change baseball to futbol xPprojects
mp roi should be a lil higher other 2 are kqol
finally also ty for not hiding bulk stuff behind credits
embargos
no i maintain this should be opt in not opt out, just give management and tracking tools to make it easier for alliance gov to deal w it
trade
yay?
yay
does this mean it will save the original data for you if you opt to delete?
navy
yay?.... p sure yayrawr
-
18 minutes ago, Azazel said:
I was going to make a long post
dewit
rawr
-
Just now, Prefonteen said:
Eat this downvote Kata.
eat your cake
rawr
-
4 hours ago, Adrienne said:
Did we tire y'all out that much? 😳
teachers have no concept of time anymore due to swapping between staggered, hybrid, online, and in person so many times
i have none cause i dont sleep >_<
rawr
- 1
- 1
-
i nominate OG tjest
everyone else is lacking in one category or another compared to them at varying time frames
as for measuring things by numbers lets not conflate stat padding w competency
discipline of ignoring glory for executing on the goals of the war should be weighed as well
if countering for each other well includes knowing when -not- to save someone... im okay w this
basically it boils down to least avg sleep/life/joy per player in a given group
On 2/13/2022 at 6:02 PM, Aglet Guyn said:not political but imma attack political entities in this post... but remember not political everybody
rawr
-
gratz to all invovled
rawr
-
I REMEMBER THE THING I FORGOT TO REPLY TO @Mars@Adrienne@Charles Bolivar
@OttoVonBisbark i totally acknowledged that thing that was said earlier by a certain someone that was deleted ....but this works better than wat i said b4:
(sorry i didnt feel like saving that persons image and cropping it)rawr
- 5
-
10 hours ago, Etat said:
when you choose to post something dumb, how on earth are you supposed to delete it??
when you find out please inform camelot
rawr
- 1
-
i still vote for referring to the population as orbs instead of orbisans
also badam*
p.s. i call tribalists cheerleaders
rawr
- 1
-
htf did u follow the same stupid logic as badam xD
more active and public ic politics has nothing to do with humans detrimental habit of ending up in a 2 party system
am i being gaslit? 😧
drink moar water
rawr
-
ooookay badam can you elaborate on how changing the scope of political interaction leads to/away from a bi polar/multi polar world cause it feels like a false equivalence rn
the rest of it escaped from my mind already sorry not sorryp.s. drink water
2 hours ago, Emperor Adam said:The roleplay is... almost non-existent.
rawr
- 1
-
Ugh... too much to reply am overwhelmed and cannot be bothered to waste time here... imma stick to the memes
(i had like 9 posts in multi quote)@Mars no
i try to keep this game seperate from the rest of the internet and the entire internet seperate from rl xP
also we will die before we finish talking about things that are more interesting
@Adrienne i said that (and that and that too .. that as well) but in english 😧
i feel your pain/too soon@Charles Bolivar forums ;3
i feel like i had another but... I am not going to go look for it yall have fun w srs posts
rawr
- 2
-
how about open source public bots would that be a good compromise???
i have been informed these would have to be hosted by admin for this to matter
i dont agree with alex owned an operated things for.. various time constraint reasons mostly... havent thought that much into it just initially feels wrong
also i think that a like top quality completely easily available to everyone bot would be a detriment to the actual world tbhthis system encourages people to start coding and have a project to work on while practicing and learning who then take those skills out of game and it improves their lives and their families lives
and ... like your point about raiding the incentive goes down if there is already publicly available high quality bots
sorry for this mess that follows5 hours ago, Mars said:1 raid war and econ stuff
2 Yarr does no automation
3 Recruitment
1 i mean... alot of this feels like "i suffered so you have to as well"... which is kinda toxic as we have seen in the place we dont talk about
also like... skrew doing math manually a bajillion times
its like... factorio... you build it once and you iterate on it then u save it and copy paste it later.... so you can focus on other things
orrrrrrrr lets say its like the nature of humanity to iterate and improve things and make things easier over time and move onto different problems
2 lesbireal heer... spreadsheets are a level of automation3 si spam new pplz automatically bad
4 hours ago, Mars said:1 guess people really love bots.
2 I am wondering though, why does the time and effort that go to making bots not go to making the actual game better.
3 And why not have an Alex owned discord bot he can get different people to help with.
1 efficiency is just applied laziness
2 players are going to work toward their own "team"'s interest helping everyone is less payoff for the amount of hours put in similar to your gripe with auto finding raid targets
not to mention like.... how admin isnt/hasnt just accepted any one putting any work into the game ... that just isnt something that is going to happen (also pplz gotta get paid)
3 see: people gotta get paid.... but i would be open to say an open source bot that multiple people contribute to4 hours ago, Bunyip said:Back in the day, Lordaeron would manually type recruitment messages
did yall tho >_<
even I didnt fully manually type every thing out every time3 hours ago, Thalmor said:begin by getting rid of recruitment bots.
yes plz
p.s. yikes3 hours ago, Mars said:recruitment, is that recruitment bots? because those are objectively cancerous and should be done away with 100%. Spam is spam
am heavily biased but yes recruitment bots bad and spam bad
1 hour ago, BlackBeard said:1 putting in multiple hours a day making sure the alliance ran properly.
2 the game hasn't been that fun for a long time.
3 Being gov actually meant something you were the few who were willing to put the time into the game.
4...spend a few hours a day ...
1 is this... really a good thing? should we be sacrificing large chunks of our lives to this game specifically?
2 i sort of understand where you are coming from as a former manual recruiter and someone who tapped out at spreadsheets, no offense but... there are other ways to have fun and have purpose simultaneously without... budgeting away so many hours and mental bandwidth that others have moved on to
can confirm blackbeard was good raider xP
3 i do agree with this point sorta i did visit alot of alliances back when i gave like .03 damns and.... frankly alot of it is just very cliquey nonsense and not much strive to better them selves/alliance after a point
4 ok so like there was this phenomenon from some video or article i read/watched.... so when ATMs came out pplz thought that it would lower jobs cause it automated so many things a bank teller would do at the time but after it was commonplace theres a much higher amount of tellers due to the newfound time and ability of the bank to offer more services (here i did a quick google search this was the top result... but not what i consumed : https://blog.acton.org/archives/90693-atms-bank-tellers-and-the-automation-paradox.html )
1 hour ago, Mars said:limited pool of potential targets that gets shared ... theres less incentive for it.
tbh id rather raiding nerfs get reversed xP
rawr -
12 hours ago, Mars said:
i have never brought up what made me lose respect for you in public ever, wouldnt want to tarnish that beautiful reputation of yours and tbh i doubt anyone would really care.
???
rawr
-
aargh
rawr
- 1
[PEACE] Time is up. (Clock vs The Backrooms)
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
condolences to all involved
rawr