Buorhann

Hahahaha, I lived some years and this is still coming around the internet.

No offense man, but you look like you get your ass kicked. Peace was probably a blessing for you.

Why not just tier the color blocs? Highest has the $75k cap, then the rest fluctuate around that. Gives more competition on color blocs. Don't really like the idea of raising the cap. The game doesn't need more money pumped into it through that. Unless you want to make the argument that having a higher cap encourages more conflict... then I can see that.

Ask DB what he did with the video we requested (OR TWO VIDEOS AT THIS POINT).

Hahaha

That's fricking awesome man.

I saw one frat boy recently, he had a container literally shaped like a huge ass that he had to carry around with his arms wrapped around it. Had a goofy straw in it to drink out of. Said "Huge Ass Beers!" on it too. Not sure if he had that made or bought it from them.

They got even bigger there recently.

What the hell.

Come join my alliance. Serious.

I can't speak on the Hollywood bit, but the NPO one? I personally warned Syndicate that they were lieing to you guys. Still, I see your point on that one. (btw, weren't you also defending NPO back then? Pretty sure you were) But are you really putting TFP up there with Hollywood and NPO/BK?

What alliances did you put faith/trust in that have bit you in the rear? I’m very curious about this.

Explain what exactly?

I'd argue the fact that TFP mentioned it to you guys in Syndicate is a sign of good faith for their intentions. They had no obligation to do that. I'm also not surprised by their relation with Eclipse, Eclipse has their own controversy with past alignments too. Could that have been handled better? Sure, so could have others that have happened. Hence my statement of people being stupid in the head with FA stuff.

If there was confirmation of TFP entering in the war, that’s one thing. I don’t mind the opportunistic reason either, but I’m also someone who likes to hit Protectorates. Still, from my experience, I know both are negative moves. As for the quoted statement, why? It’s been done multiple times throughout the history of this game with no detriment. Sidenote: Firwof upvoted your reply. That’s an automatic penalty there.

So you're agreeing on the whole "INTENTION" of future allying a hostile party is justification? Your logic is... weird. "They declared on you because of the likely hood of you being a hostile party next war cycle" What? That's how you definitely make enemies. Not just with the alliance you're suspect of, but of others as well who's watching your actions. See, stupid shit like that is why I simply just go for burning pixels as my CB. Some of you are whack in the head with your FA perspectives.

I get it, you're being opportunistic about it. Personally I see that as a colossal !@#$ up on FA, but... that's Syndicate for you. I honestly can't recall a single time that I ever crossed that line, even during my time with Mensa HQ and our trolling proxy warring screwing around. I may be wrong, that's just not something normal.

Can't wait to see what box this opens up!

<Insert "That's the joke" meme here>

Aren't you one of Singularity's leakers?

Lol

Thanks for the clarification. Wasn’t sure when the treaty dropped.

Syndicate set the precedence of ignoring a 72 hour notice. Did Eclipse just follow up on that too?

Do you butter side up or down?