Jump to content

jack3top

Members
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jack3top

  1. We are entering a new era. Lets work towards a bright future
  2. ooh discord, well consider it next time. So, ToG 2.0, well, Im hoping to remove ToG shadow. So, Im take this opportunity to explain what happened to ToG. There was supposed to be a merge with another alliance. Their leader noah williams(IDK how many names he has switched) wanted to be in the heir position, so I gave heir to him. You can say I wasnt bright enough to know he rob the entire bank and close down the alliance. Here is his link anyway https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=47708. After this was discovered, the remnants of ToG went to form a new alliance called Stag corp. jack left to take a break at HBE. We look forward to walking hand in hand with Valyria and its associates, Friends and other alliances in orbis.
  3. Congrats to everyone on reaching peace. Looking forward to a orbis filled with PEACE. All have fought well, now rest well and rebuild.
  4. Nice to see more alliances starting to enjoy the peace. Wish DEIC a speedy rebuild.
  5. Like to thank sk here for protecting us. We intend to grow as an alliance and not stay stagnant. Thanks all well-wishers too.
  6. Its now 6 july 2016, this thread was started in 2016 (lets hope this events thing become a reality soon instead of just being an in-game idea Too many negative, some positive Launch first satellite to space Market recovry
  7. the war is over, time to heal those wounds, take a good break and rebuild
  8. suck our dick to get cheap digs maybe the part above can be reworded?its just a game, try and be polite to each other.
  9. For the sake of fairness it is important to not The Syndicates total losses. Since the amount of damage they took was so great leading up to the war, the stats do not accurately reflect their performance this war, as more damage could have been done to them had they not been damaged so badly. I have taken the liberty of compiling the stats in the Alpha war using the same resource as Memph here. From April 22nd to June 12th From April 22nd to June 25th It is also important to note that 26% of Alpha’s damage over a two month period (12 rounds of war) was done by TEst who only fought Alpha for one round. TEst outperformed tS in damage at a 6:1 ratio. Way to go Alpha and TEst!
  10. Since its been suggested before but denied, I cant say much just that long-term this game will become another game which gets dull and boring like you know *to those who criticize me including one asking me to go back to fallout 4(I dont play fallout 4, and seems like post has been edited), or that I should feel ashamed, I feel sad that new ideas cant be accepted and worked on together, instead someone must produce out everything, no discussion and then thats how people decide whether to reject or approve the idea. Going to answer a few basic questions that I think should be answered/brief write-up on my thoughts on why I suggested these stuff, if anyone can do better and make p&w community accept it, it be great. ============================================================ Why water?water is the elixir of life Suggest?water refinery to refine water that is commonly found but undrinkable Ideas: when there is summer, less water maybe even might have drought and then all food production decreases (output from farms) How did I arrive at this idea in the first place?well, I was thinking about nuke damage and uses of nuke in P&w then I came across on how you can use nuclear technology to detect sources of water. Then I saw, P&w has no water as a resource, maybe water refinery to process water, and reservoirs to store the water. (on a side note, it be great if we have granary to store food, this way somebody cannot stockpile large amount of resources and there is a cap) My idea if this water suggestion was accepted was to suggest that we should have nuclear enrichment centres to enrich the nuclear fuel. Currently, you just buy uranium, and if you got the project,cash and resources you just build the nuke, too easy. I was thinking, how to make it a bit harder and time consuming to get nukes, because when the game develops further, next time hundreds of nations will be having nukes, how to make people think twice before acquiring nukes, currently only the person who the nuke hits get damaged. So, I was thinking if we had nuclear enrichment facilities to enrich the uranium like in RL, time to get the nuke increases, one new market for enriched uranium to be sold. For the nuke back-fire part, mistakes do happen it is possible that technicians made a mistake and the nuke lands in your own country, this will make people think twice before firing nukes. Now we come to the morale part, if your country is in war, your country gets nuked, it is either your people are resolved to fight or just surrender. Same context as if you carry out a air raid and succeed, your compatriots will also be affected that you did a successful job and morale goes up, while if you fail, everyone gets affected after a few times. For submarines, thought it be a wonderful addition to the game, imagine a new naval unit that can break blockades I will not post any new suggestions in future. No point annoying others anyway, I guess I am not clear in all my suggestions thats why everyones so mad, ending with this "Be open to new suggestions and always question old assumptions", I rest my case.
  11. Leave out the vulgar, just say the facts, this way, you not get warned and I can try to understand why you are so mad.
  12. Too game changing?so you mean there should not be any big game changes since it is in stable mode?
  13. It be a fun challenge to see how people include it in the current order of improvements. Why is it a huge waste of effort? well, we need food and water to survive, should be same here too in my opinion
  14. At least, tell me why its not feasible.
  15. Humans need food and water to survive. This game is trying to simulate real world, right? If this is right, we got food but no water. Water is found naturally all around the world, however not all the water found is consumable. Water needs to undergo treatment in order to be consumed. Hence I propose a new improvement called "water treatment plant" and a new resource called "treated water". If someone does not have treated water, his nation population will survive however, disease rate +5%. Whats your thoughts?Any questions?
  16. well, I spent more than 30s just thinking about it and translating it into words, well, not in-depth though
  17. thks to you, thats why I decided to redo it today
  18. so here goes, hope its better We should have military morale and it will affect the odds of a battle. Military morale is self explanatory. At the start of every battle, military morale is 50. The longer the battle, the more the military morale drops as soldiers get tired. The more battles that a nation is involved in at the same time, the more the military morale will drop. In the event a nation get beiged, and wages his first battle since his last beige, his morale will start at 75 instead as his military had ample time to prepare for new attacks. If a nation gets war declared on it, its military morale will be 40. Morale will affect the military odds by -3/+4%. For each military action, both sides military morale will be affected. In the event of a nuclear strike, military morale may go up/down by (50% chance) ps: if fail is same effect but negative summary: nation gets declared on morale 40;aggressor will be 50, for nations who just emerged from beige and have their first battle, morale is 75
  19. To those who say its bad, can you give reasons or produce something better? If you cannot produce something better than stop whining
  20. submarines would be excellent at breaking blockades, nukes back-firing, is possible as everyone makes mistakes, when it happens you know of it. Well, we can do away with the approval rating changes part if there is a better idea to make people think twice before before firing nukes. True there is a environmental penalty currently, but well, there should be a more deterrent penalty, currently its not enough in my opinion
  21. Well, maybe we can make it if approval rating negative, income -5%, positive, no effect. This will also make people think twice on how they treat their people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.