Jump to content

A joint announcement from Hollywood, Rosesphere, Oasis, and Clockbloc


Raphael
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Kosta said:

Its better than the TWO major spheres that we had during NPOs time. Right now we have more BLOCs than what history has presented us. We are progressing. 

This is absolutely the point, thanks Kosta. The bleating about mini-spheres was going and going, then we managed to get to five relatively equal spheres, nad guess what? Still stagnant. So, no NAPs helps too. Good work on this, team. Glad it got done!

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grumpy supports a napless future.  It also doesn't surprise me that tS didn't want to sign this, they love them some NAPs.  They have generally been the ones to push for them in all the recent peace talks, they wanted a .  If you remember, after GnR both sides said we dont need no stinking NAP, and we got to war again 2 months after that war ended. 

For the record to all those that do complain about stagnation.  The way people play this game, you generally get punished for being active and starting shit.  So if you want to start a war, you will probably win that one, but most likely will lose the one after that, or eventually piss enough people off that everyone teams up and beats you down.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

For the record to all those that do complain about stagnation.  The way people play this game, you generally get punished for being active and starting shit.  So if you want to start a war, you will probably win that one, but most likely will lose the one after that, or eventually piss enough people off that everyone teams up and beats you down.

Fake news, it took years and years until everyone teamed up and beat us down.

We did suffer from success, so I guess that was our punishment.

Sorry you create shitty spheres that have weak ass endurance.

  • Haha 1
Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

Grumpy supports a napless future.  It also doesn't surprise me that tS didn't want to sign this, they love them some NAPs.  They have generally been the ones to push for them in all the recent peace talks, they wanted a .  If you remember, after GnR both sides said we dont need no stinking NAP, and we got to war again 2 months after that war ended. 

Support whatever the !@#$ you want, I want my alliance to support the right maneuver for the next W.

After being allowed to maneuver the way you have, make sure you keep this same energy.

  • Upvote 1
Lxr4VfE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.