luciuskonst Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I understand that for flags, we currently have a system where flags are suggested by people and will be approved before being made an option. I was wondering if we can just allow users to customise their own flags. We can keep the current system so that if we want a flag from RL, we can just choose from the list that is already in place. But for users who want their own flag, it can be quite difficult since they can't put it up until it gets approved. Just a suggestion that I thought could come in handy for new nations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted October 1, 2014 Administrators Share Posted October 1, 2014 I understand that for flags, we currently have a system where flags are suggested by people and will be approved before being made an option. I was wondering if we can just allow users to customise their own flags. We can keep the current system so that if we want a flag from RL, we can just choose from the list that is already in place. But for users who want their own flag, it can be quite difficult since they can't put it up until it gets approved. Just a suggestion that I thought could come in handy for new nations. Custom Flags are a donation option that we use to sustain an otherwise free game. If you'd like to have a custom flag, simply make a donation ($10 for just your nation, $20 if you want it to be available for an alliance and all nations in that alliance) and then send me a link to the flag during the payment process. https://politicsandwar.com/donate/ I do my best to process all donations within 24 hours, so the time it may take to approve or deny your flag is very short. Quote Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) The idea is that flags don't add any advantages to the game and are purely cosmetic, thus you pay money for them. Edit: Ninja'd Edited October 1, 2014 by underlordgc 1 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seryozha Nikanor Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Take a look at Planetside 2 for example all of the pretty much Pay 2 Win things are cosmetic changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted October 3, 2014 Administrators Share Posted October 3, 2014 Take a look at Planetside 2 for example all of the pretty much Pay 2 Win things are cosmetic changes. Pay 2 Win != Cosmetic Changes The point of having cosmetic changes being what's paid for is that you avoid the idea of pay-to-win altogether. Quote Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.