ColoringNick Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 If we did take over NK I thinkk we would end up killing most of the population as most of the population. Those people are brain washed into thinking that foreigners are evil. Though we can reunit NK with SK and let SK deal with this afterwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grendle‌‌ Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Nobody deserves any rights. any more posts, and I will ban Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stanislaw Sikorski Posted October 21, 2014 Author Share Posted October 21, 2014 If we did take over NK I thinkk we would end up killing most of the population as most of the population. Those people are brain washed into thinking that foreigners are evil. Though we can reunit NK with SK and let SK deal with this afterwards. If they fight back, they won't really be civilians as they're part of the war. Quote Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 I don't think using force to "enforce rights" abroad will ever work. Human Rights are a basic part of the "Social Contract" in a state. The people there can handle it. Maybe not every people is ready for the same level of rights as certain European countries. Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kappa Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 The people within the respective countries need to recognize a state of injustice experienced by others within its state, and prioritize whether the fundamental freedom of a nation and it's people is more important than their isolated fears created by a forced leadership. Self-realized human rights, within a nation, is far better (long-term) than enforced human rights. People wouldn't see acts of aggression on its country for what it would truly represent, but more so, simply as an act of aggression (and possibly war), as the controlled media, of one's nation, would portray it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhail Gorbachev Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Define "We" here. Because if EVERYBODY worked to ensure that everybody else was happy and to help them, the world would be a utopia. No poverty, no war, no crime, they would be things of the past. But sadly for us, utopia is a dream, which I doubt will ever be achieved. I imagine the world will always be awful, it's just human nature to be as we are. Meh, it's gotten better. And while I doubt utopia is possible (at least any time soon), I think we can improve the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grillick Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Meh, it's gotten better. And while I doubt utopia is possible (at least any time soon), I think we can improve the world.Utopia is impossible by definition. 1 Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 First libertarian book I ever read was called "There are no utopias." Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emmad Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Not really, generally what happens when we try to enforce them is cause things to get worse (embargo, etc). Only true way to enforce would be to invade them and who really want's that responsibility? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.