Lannan13 Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Greetings Politics and war, As you all know, the lines between Freedom of Speech and Privacy have a gray line. The Synder V Phelps case increased some of the line for the grounds of Free Speech. I come to you today to ask, where do you draw the lines between what constitutes as free speech and where does privacy begin. I look forward to your responses. Quote Tiocfaidh ár lá =Censored by Politics and War Moderation team= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I'm not sure what the question is. Why does there have to be a line between two unrelated things? Are you asking if I find it OK to tell secrets or something? Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K W Jackson Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 do you mean privacy vs security? Quote For Meripez! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Well it's the westburough (sp?) Case that he references. So free speech vs a person's right to not have to listen to it (privacy)? Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Well it's the westburough (sp?) Case that he references. So free speech vs a person's right to not have to listen to it (privacy)? What is this westburough case? You mean this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps Pfft. !@#$ that idea. That's just ridiculous. When I drive to work, I run the risk of dying in a crash, yet I still drive to work. The world was not created to kiss the asses of oversensitive, babied, or over sheltered pricks. I mean I think I can safely say that nobody wants to see the KKK holding a rally in their town square, but I also don't want to see Glen Beck having his own TV network. I don't want to see rain or wind when I walk outside. I don't want the neighbors dog trying to attack my dog. I don't want green eggs and ham. Unfortunately, the world wasn't placed here to solely not do things that I don't like. Countless Vietnam vets came home to "you're a baby killer". Should we sue every protester from the 60s and 70s? What if it's the government that "doesn't want to hear it?" Free speech > Privacy Peoples feel goods. 1 Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I will not argue this, just trying to clarify what the OP was trying to get at. He at least mentioned a court case to generate debate. 1 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lannan13 Posted February 28, 2016 Author Share Posted February 28, 2016 do you mean privacy vs security? That^ Quote Tiocfaidh ár lá =Censored by Politics and War Moderation team= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lannan13 Posted February 28, 2016 Author Share Posted February 28, 2016 What is this westburough case? You mean this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps Pfft. !@#$ that idea. That's just ridiculous. When I drive to work, I run the risk of dying in a crash, yet I still drive to work. The world was not created to kiss the asses of oversensitive, babied, or over sheltered pricks. I mean I think I can safely say that nobody wants to see the KKK holding a rally in their town square, but I also don't want to see Glen Beck having his own TV network. I don't want to see rain or wind when I walk outside. I don't want the neighbors dog trying to attack my dog. I don't want green eggs and ham. Unfortunately, the world wasn't placed here to solely not do things that I don't like. Countless Vietnam vets came home to "you're a baby killer". Should we sue every protester from the 60s and 70s? What if it's the government that "doesn't want to hear it?" Free speech > Privacy Peoples feel goods. I'm quite sure that enforcability plays a huge part of it. You can always fine someone for violating privacy, but free speech is nearly impossible to enforce. Quote Tiocfaidh ár lá =Censored by Politics and War Moderation team= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutsuo Toi Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 ..., but free speech is nearly impossible to enforce. Well... You're right. Everybody was born with a mouth, and a mouth were created to speak. You can't tell people even the dumb animal itself to shut up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.