Jump to content

Noctis Anarch Caelum

Members
  • Posts

    1017
  • Joined

Everything posted by Noctis Anarch Caelum

  1. George offered to wipe a debt, pay to rebuild my cities & get me a bunch of cities after my nation was wrecked in some micro drama if I stayed 3 months when I was bored with the game. So it was either join BK & grow just being there; or default on a debt. So was actually a pretty good offer with the cities gained & debt cleared without much activity required. Look at my username to answer your question, although Noctis on Discord. Although even George thinks BK a lost cause now, who was the only reason I gave BK a shot & the subservient treaty they have with goons is pretty degrading.
  2. They were at war either way, but at least now they’re not fighting to further those who would have been their enemy after if they helped you guys win until the end. ?
  3. I really doubt anyone with defensive treaties with them would care when they NAP those at war and/or trying to extort their only allies above ODP... Although not my call, although they just made themselves useless as allies from my perspective at least.
  4. Even if TMC are mess ups; doesn’t mean there isn’t any reason for people to fight. BK/NPO with their goons MDAP are fine with goons starting wars; then declaring on any allies who counter. So whether Fark should do anything I think depends on whether it’s possible to win.
  5. Enjoy safety from those 3 alliances I guess an entire month after the war ends, while their allies can still attack though.
  6. Congrats on the NAP with an alliance who still has active wars on ally & wanted half a billion to peace out last I heard. Edit: Although even if someone pays goons the half billion, would have nothing to do with me & goons peacing. Since I don’t agree with anyone paying them regardless.
  7. That had nothing to do with why Shadowthrone said it wasn’t broken, as it was never in writing they had to be allied at the time or anyone on the other side can’t force those who were into war just attacking their allies. Also goons didn’t sign it, so it only means anything when it prevents people from fighting them together when victory is still possible.
  8. Everyone you ask will have a different answer on who’s covered or what Fark Sphere even is; as well as who is bound by it on the other side. Since as Mythic said, they never signed. Lol
  9. Yet goons attacking an ally of a Fark ally didn’t violate apparently.
  10. It’s your word against someone else who is telling me you had it, which matches my memory perfect. Not to mention most of you were high gov in Camelot before making this raiding alliance which does do treaties & nothing like Arrgh. Edit: Anyways whether you had the prot doesn’t really matter. I just remember it existing and others do. So don’t believe you, but not worth arguing about it.
  11. Sure if Sphinx breaks off they’ll try making him look bad bringing up old stuff they’ve known about for ages, like when Pestilence left.
  12. That is one reason I don’t see how that Fark-NAP thing was ever valid, since alliances are sovereign entities unless they give it up. So can’t surprise sign treaties for others.
  13. You also tend to lie, so I’ll go with my memory which I’m confident in & others messaged me to confirm I wasn’t wrong about when you started saying it never existed.
  14. It lasted around 2 weeks when you guys setup, so you were one & lying about it doesn’t change that. Could have said that was cancelled a long time ago if you didn’t want to lie about it. Don’t check your treaties often, so I had no idea when it was canceled.
  15. Even if true, most of Fark’s Allies can be hit supposedly without violating it if ODP doesn’t count. As many are ODP now. So doesn’t make a big difference. Edit: Also was confirmed to me I’m not remembering wrong and you had a prot. So that was a lie, knew I saw a Protectorate before.
  16. Guess people can use a lot of words to try justifying ignoring a NAP which had no words; although since it had no clear terms or words to it; guess people can interpret it many ways. Although if it covers ODP allies, then it doesn’t matter when Mythic was switched to ODoAP in regards to their attacks. Although a distinction was never made on some types of allies being covered and others not. So props to Camelot at least for somehow creating a dozen or so holes in the idea of this NAP with some of their allies bring able to ignore it; as others supposedly covered. Lol
  17. Not sure when Camelot switched Mythic to ODoAP from Protectorate; although they been hitting Fark & allies a lot regardless. So seems kind of a useless meme when nobody clearly knows who is covered and most didn’t agree to it before supposedly being included. Camelot didn’t even know what it meant when announced.
  18. So BoC, who normally you’d want to kill for leaving the Coalition being hit was enough for TMC to not be covered. Even though it was said the NAP doesn’t apply to those who leave the Coalition. Makes sense...
  19. So chains can be invoked similar by either side, even if I’m unsure how TMC violated it. Need a better explanation on the reasoning & circumstances for me to buy this.
  20. TMC isn’t allied with Fark? How does the NAP work even if allies can be hit?
  21. Mythic was declaring on both sides earlier despite being allied with Coalition B; so you guys thought it was valid to raid both sides at least. Also don’t think he’s talking about treaty partners, but people who can be considered on the same side with a judgement call based on mutual enemies.
  22. This is why I think limiting nations who are blockaded from accessing the bank to send out funds is a much more logical fix.
  23. The dominant state in a hegemony would be the Hegemon, but makes no sense for any of them to help you guys become it. Since they won’t be. Although nice distinction to make though.
  24. He did stick around until at least November 5th, which I think was when I said would be a good time for the war to end way back. So I don't think he did anything wrong really. Also Pestilence recruited into BK, promoted me to Duke of Econ; as well as allowed me to leave free of debt. So I think BK lost one of their best Gov with him. My opinion at least, did feel closest with him while BK even if we haven't spoken in ages.
  25. Seeing as NPO & BK have made clear they're MDAP and fully support any GOONS aggression; my resolve in this war has only been strengthened. I do appreciate the confirmation from BK & NPO they fully stand with goons, so there is no confusion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.