Jump to content

Ryan1

Members
  • Posts

    367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ryan1

  1. It's kind of hard for me to leave...I deleted my nation, but still occasionally check up on discord/the forums. Lucky for me, I saw this and have a chance to nominate Sketchy for the LUX prize.

    Sketchy is truly an outstanding individual in Orbis. He is so kind,  thoughtful, and is dedicated to making BK feel good about itself. Considering how much BK has been boasting lately, I think we can all say he's been successful. I nominate him for the LUX prize.

    Just remembered Caspian is from Camelot. I'll be shocked if the winner someone from his corporation (Beacon Inc) or Coalition B.

  2. Thanks for the support everyone. 

    I totally support Caspian XII's idea for the LUX prize. To be honest, the community is getting more toxic, probably due to the war, and although it wasn't why I left, it could certainly affect other players. 

  3. 1 hour ago, Menace said:

    I think it would be more interesting if events happened on a global or continental scale instead of at the nation level. You could have different themes of the same events, perhaps "dustbowl" wipes out food production in North America, "sandstorm" for Africa, "emus" for Australia. Many small events would just get annoying. I would rather have the odds be something like 3 continental events and 1 global event a year, with effects longer than a just a few days or turns.

    Maybe a hurricane could affect all nations in a given area, or alien invasion and plague could enter different nations.

    • Upvote 1
  4.  
     
     
     
     
    0
     Advanced issues found
     
     
    4
    18 hours ago, Akuryo said:

    In 2-3 years i suspect NPO will average something like 25 cities or more. Which based on the way the game is currently sounds awful. Mid tier suddenly being c25, or higher, sounds frankly insane. And boy would it suck for new alliances who'd have to tier to city 18 to even begin being relevant to anything. 

    Oh god no.

  5. On 7/21/2019 at 1:19 AM, Prefontaine said:

    Having the "underdog" side or losing side of a war having the option to fight back is usually considered a good thing. Is it if the way it happens is to keep extending the war? Would wars be better off so that when a side wins in the first few week(s) it becomes increasingly harder for the losing side to dig their way out of that say -100B hole they're in and try to level the field? I'm not saying the nuke bloc style is good or bad, or the IQ planes only strat is good or bad. I think it's good to have varying styles of play. However is the "extend a war for longer and longer periods of time in hopes of chipping away at that total losses number" a good way to be going forward?

    This is a tough question. Changing it so it's harder for the underdog to fight back (making wars shorter) seems like a good thing, but with the current politics in Orbis it only makes the BK hegemony more powerful unless a big chunk breaks off. 

  6. 7 hours ago, JesterTheSheep said:

    Correction, I have 8 cities with around 1750 infra

    When you hit me, you had 7 and either 2200, 2300, or 2500 infra in those cities not to mention completely inconsistent builds. Join a decent alliance with competent gov and learn how to actually play. 

     
     
    1
     Advanced issues found
     
     
     
    7 hours ago, JesterTheSheep said:

    given all the crap NPO gave me over basically nothing.

    Beige discipline is a very important part of wars, especially in a dogpile like this. 

     

    7 hours ago, JesterTheSheep said:

    Second, who are you exactly? I seen your name, sure, but I have no record of declaring war on you.

    You've definitely seen me around, I'm everywhere in PW. And my nation is Hammonasset, though your history may not go back that far. 

  7. On 6/21/2019 at 3:30 PM, JesterTheSheep said:

    I signed in this morning to find out I was producing 0 Food. Why? Because global nuclear war had broken out. Great job, geniuses, now we're all starving. Now, we're ALL gonna die.

     

    Was it worth it? I don't think so.

     

    Seriously, why the nukes? You literally made playing this game impossible now. Radiation takes FOREVER to go away.

     

    I mean it: why?? Why is any of this worth it?

    I just realized you're the OFA guy with 7 2500 infra cities who declared an attrition war on my 14 800 infra cities.

    • Haha 1
  8.  
     
    0
     Advanced issues found
     
     
     
    On 12/31/2018 at 8:55 PM, Olive Penderghast said:

    Application:

    Nation name: Hammonasset

    Population (may use in-game numbers): 820,543

    Population density (may use in-game numbers): 112.57 people/sq mi.

    Official currency: Dollar

    GDP (may use in-game numbers): 421,544,415

    GDP per capita (may use in-game numbers): 513.74

    Form of government: Federal Republic...for now

    Describe your nation: Northeastern US nation built out of the ashes of the USA and recently rebuilt after being destroyed by a certain science experiment gone wrong...

    Politics & War Wikia link (leave blank if you don’t have one): 

    Have you read, and agree to abide by the rules of the map/subforum? (Yes/No): Yes

    Where on the map do you wish to be located? (Using real-world geography, or a self-provided map): Northeastern USA, states of NH, VT (southern half for both), southern NY (south of Albany), northern NJ, CT, RI, MA. 

    Nation flag link (if you have a specific one you wish to use): Not yet. 

     

     

  9. 13 hours ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

    Supposidly Arrgh is in your coalition, but attack both sides eventually. So think we should be careful with making up weird rules to prevent people in loosely defined coalitions from fighting as these wars drag out. Curu has his thoughts on it & not sure where he says it’s to prevent declarations. I think NPO likely filled all their slots to destroy all their planes as efficiently as possible. 

    Arrgh does Arrgh.

  10. 1 hour ago, Roquentin said:

    As the situation deteriorated, our need to enter would increase to avoid a complete victory and domination by your coalition

    By the people who actually supported mini-spheres? No, not this "I'll drop old allies, keep secret treaties with them, and sign on new meatshields" BS, actual "I'll get away from the treaty web and do my one thing with a handful of competent alliances". But keep telling us all about KERCHTOG's hegemonic intentions, it's quite entertaining. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.