Jump to content

The Royalist

Members
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Royalist

  1. This passes any shitty update you’ve ever made. Do you think with your ass when you make these updates? If you don’t have the patience or respect for the player base when deciding to mock us with your updates then at least take a deep breath and a step back when you see literally everyone saying this is a bad idea. Instead of ignoring us or threatening people with strikes like I have seen in dm s, man up and participate in the discussion. 

    When did this game become a dictatorship?

  2. 6 minutes ago, Abbas Mehdi said:

    I mean it's a credible and admirable charachter. I would assume it's a sincere evaluation. 

    Oh idk why they are not posting right now. This thread is a debate between different relevant individuals. They for sure can speak for themselves, we are not BK. I was just sharing my perspective of the changes and amends camelot has been attempting and it's something I have definitely expected and even mentioned to other alliances we fought last war. And if I start calling out someone that is making good efforts at rehabilitation then I am just gonna be no different than Roquentin that questioned every sincere intention to help him create the multipolar world that he destroyed within one blitz. 

    Definitely not saying you’re BK, was just curious what you’re referring to as camelot’s character, because they don’t have that good of a rep. 

    If they’re looking to improve and change themselves, then perhaps they should come forward and show some remorse for their wrongdoings. 

    • Upvote 1
  3. 12 minutes ago, Abbas Mehdi said:

    I can answer just here from what I know so far to @Hodor @Sisyphus @Thalmor and you @Prefonteen

    Sval the leader of OWR vouched for camelot's charachter before we comitted. 

    I am not calling them saints here but the only differences we all have with camelot are IC differences for being a BK lapdog and they have already made efforts that I appreciate and will improve upon it as they learn to understand the game better and the political realities. IQ did not even let their membership on these forums to talk lol. 

    How exactly can someone vouch for someone’s character when they have nothing to lose towards rose? 
    Also, is Camelot not understanding game ‘better and the political realities’ the reason why they’re not defending themselves? 

  4. Some of you have already nailed it about owning up, which would be the best solution to some of the alliances that fought on IQ’s side. Especially since some (Camelot) continued to defend the IQ narrative after the war was over. 

  5. 6 minutes ago, Keegoz said:

    The leaks show that you literally lie within them. Apparently Lory did and didn't leak.

    It was stated several times in this thread that lory leaked. I don’t see where it’s said Lordy didn’t leak. Just read the original leak, and look at what the news server leak says about who gave them the info.

  6. 7 minutes ago, Akuryo said:

    MFW the likes of TCW and Empy trying to play as either intelligent, righteous, or clever after starting things off with "we don't care about the reasoning".

    mp,550x550,matte,ffffff,t.jpg

    Golden coming from you. This whole thing started off because you decided to steal a deposit😛. And then decided to lie to get away with it, which further adds to the point I made earlier, where sphinx isn’t the one being like IQ.

    Mfw the likes of akuryo bankrupt an alliance, then steal to get a bit of cash, then fail to cover that up too.

    • Upvote 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Kevanovia said:

    Errr, what? Lol what would I edit or delete? The only thing damnable are actions that tCW have taken and apparently continue to take. 
     

    The fact that this chat is chopped up and you didn’t leak our entire discussion of us outlining your faults makes it easy enough for people to see what happened here.

    I don’t think you realize all the whole chat was saved, so you trying to spin this to your suitability won’t work😛

    1 hour ago, Sketchy said:

    No better way to prove you didn't leak then to take part in more leaking.

    I mean it’s clearly stated (by you as well) that someone else leaked, and not Odin. So your narrative of ‘Odin leaked so that’s why we’re confiscating his deposits’ won’t work. 

    1 hour ago, Keegoz said:

    Via UPN, no less. These IQ alliances gotta try and ruin everything.

    You’re the one who basically said ‘the matter is closed, don’t talk to us about it.’ You then immediately started acting as if you were trying to solve the issue, but Sphinx/Odin wouldn’t listen or be reasonable.

    • Upvote 1
  8. 59 minutes ago, Master said:

    You mean the same Test that has lost in the last month 5 of their most experienced players and whose only purpose of existence is to fund their gov with cities and repay their loans through tax-farming their inexperienced and inactive players ?

    Yeah you are definitely right, they have to be ''bigger'' ...

    Well I doubt they’re using money for growth plans aimed at only their gov. And I don’t really see the problem of taxing idiots and inactives, lol. It’s what alliances including KT have always done, and it has great returns. 
    TEst still has many experienced players, and new guys are being trained as we speak. They’ll continue growing and become even a better alliance than they currently are.
    So, I’m not sure what you’re mad at exactly, as I was only pointing out akuryo was wrong with his post.

  9. 1 hour ago, Akuryo said:

    *Looks at TCW* mate you don't have a single treaty that isn't a micro. Probably because everyone else has standards.

    TEst is bigger than 4/5 of the alliances in your bloc😛. You were also allied to them until recently. 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.