ComradeMilton

No. I did.

I'm seriously imagining you with an IRL Health Point meter and when it goes down making an appointment with your doctor to replenish them. It's hilarious

This has nothing to do with CoB negotiations at all. Our negotiators aren't even posting much, if at all.

Very well. How old is George, thief of at least three alliance banks, old IC?

Because I have no inappropriate words in my name. Alex will probably rule by linking to the much earlier thread where he's already said I'm fine. If you want to see it feel free, but I'm absolutely unconcerned beyond entertainment value.

Your nation is barely three years old. It's no wonder there are gaps in your knowledge of Orbis history. I think a lot of it is on the wiki to read though. I mean, should you want to catch up.

What's going in these threads is entirely counterproductive. CoB's negotiating team might start talking to him again if he closes these threads and contacts them in the negotiations server in private.

Yes, based on how he ruled on my naming.

I'm not whining. I'm not in BK. I'm saying CoA is trusting a liar in these threads and now people are even admitting they know George is a liar and still believing his posts. It's kind of hilarious how much cognitive dissonance is manifesting here. Terms and private negotiation are not at all unprecedented. They've happened in every single war in this game that hasn't ended in white peace. The process is one term by one term. If you don't like it, remain at war. We can accommodate you either way you choose to go.

Alex already ruled my name abides by the rules. Sorry., hope.

I've been playing this game since the beta. There's no gap for me.

Correct, which given he's mentioning CoA and CoB's opinion means he's dragging things out by purposefully attempting to discuss negotiation terms in public when it's always done privately. We're not the ones who are urgently wanted the war to end.

I'm always OOC. I'd use real names in place of nicks if I knew them.

CoA is really doing it. You're just more friendly towards CoA than CoB so you're blaming based on that. Victory. As for the targets, it sucks, but CoA is hideously depleted, but haven't completed peace terms so we continue to attack them.

Baghdad Bob implies I'm not telling the truth. I am telling the truth it's just that you don't seem to want to hear anything from anyone but CoA posters, leadership and allies. I missed that and reading CoB's posts again still do not see someone with sufficient access validating it. That's not how it works. You can't confirm anything that's happened since you fled as BK found out how much you'd stolen. As for the wasted time thing above George... I did something weird and it won't let me split it anymore. But us doing nothing because CoA isn't abiding by the privacy aspect is pretty much the least possible wasted time there is.

Which means you implicitly admit you believe George is a thief. You're just bitter that it's proven he's a thief. Terms are discussed privately. This is public. While this and similar threads remain active it's unlikely negotiations will resume.

We don't really need to convince CoA. It's not a huge problem. People here tend to assume an absence of denial is the same as confirmation of authenticity. Terms are one at a time. Same as before. And not public. So... Basically they've wasted a month or so hoping Partisan whining in public would help the cause.

Yeah, but the thing is it's not working. As he confirmed.

It's been confirmed that it happened as BK expected by the owner and administrator of the game. You're basically admitting here you believe George stole the money.

We have our story straight. You can even go back in the logs for that channel and find the original conversation as it exists in fact rather than these, uh, adjusted versions.

God bless our brave men and women.

They know Gorge stole (more than) 5b because Alex checked the game logs and verified it. He can do things like that.

Yeah, it's looking more like significant editing rather than outright, full fake logs. So the logs are still kind of useless because they don't include the actual conversations or altered material. Same thing as far as I'm concerned because altered logs are still fake logs.

No, it's not. He only term about it was regarding counters. ..when you start posting about them in public....yes You're choosing to believe that. Which is fine, but that doesn't make it genuine or accurate.

No, they'd be ignoring him because he's attempting to gain something and doing so publicly. Which is unacceptable.