Jump to content

ComradeMilton

Members
  • Posts

    1777
  • Joined

Everything posted by ComradeMilton

  1. Nah, you were offering ten times the zero you paid.
  2. So a one-personal alliance's vote has he same weight as TKR's? And that fixes something? My idea is as it's been done before this year's abortion because it worked. sweet bitterness, there Max.
  3. That doesn't really help address the issue, even if it's the case.
  4. Interestingly you don't address that the rules were enforced just as they were written. You're a new nation, though, maybe that's why you either don't know or just don't like the rules that've been present for years.
  5. 10x0=0 so that's not really going to help.
  6. Being well-done is far more important than transparency or whatever. This year's primary awards are just absolutely terrible.
  7. So micros have the same weight to their votes as giant alliances? That seems like it'll be inaccurate too. I think we should just beg the people who usually run the awards to come back.
  8. By legal, you mean...legal, I guess Your side is running this via bots? The war mechanics are working fine. Very well, in fact, if you work with the mechanics rather than as you think it should be in your idyllic vision of the game.
  9. So you were in your own alliance holding a huge amount of resources and cash and then went into VM? That's a violation of the rule and you received the lesser penalty given for it. It's been a rule for years.
  10. This is already like real-life. The US doesn't pay its soldiers based on how many military activities the country is involved in. It's by what units are doing what and that's how upkeep is calculated already. Tell your alliance leaders if you want peace, don't try to introduce long-term unbalance to the game to do it.
  11. I agree with you. The game is working. Artificially intervening to assist one side (which is effectively be what this does) could change the power structure that's been worked for so long to develop. Do all the CoB alliances get a forcible timeout from war when attacked in the future when they're losing? Probably not, right? Because you'd be appalled at Alex changing things in the game functions to effectively grant a huge advantage to whichever CoB alliance desired it.
  12. All the more reason to allow the game to run as it's intended to. I also think we should keep our current system.
  13. If I can't do Lunar New Year for a two day VM I don't see why Christians should be able to do several days VM for Christmas.
  14. Alex and his moderation group hold no power in Discord outside of their servers.
  15. The slow-down has been enabled for like a week non-stop. So no, it's not that.
  16. We came in late primarily due to not existing at the beginning.
  17. Our business is being handled. Are we the world's arch evil because we have on part in the CoB group of negotiation representatives?
  18. Why do you envision our alliance as something apocalyptic with you riding in with your two friends to lead everyone else to victory? Yes, Alex is actually really Jazz, but that shouldnt discourage you. Perhaps don't make grandiose claims you are unable to back up in the future?
  19. You were really, really confident we'd be defeated by now and all of a sudden you flee to VM during active wars... It's strange.
  20. There were like four line members posting. CoB has more alliances than that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.