The Mad Titan

Ummm no. TGH has not initiated any risky wars in its history. Good fighters sure, but in no way are you a Test who suicides knowing they'll lose. In AC you hit Polar when IQ was busy thinking you would get away with it, so it wasn't started believing it would be a risky war. 69 day war wasn't up to you, and when you rolled TRF there was no risk there at all since their allies were busy. Lets not get all revisionist history here.

Theres no way this isn't a masterful troll at this point in time.

Glad to be working with y'all!

As transparent as posting a misleading graph with snarky remarks and no context?

Dude stop no one agrees.

The masses are telling you they want war lol

It’s wrong though. You have alliances counted twice and periphery alliances that aren’t part of the sphere.

Didn't realized we still controlled an entire tier, unless you are implying T$ and BK have something going on? And calling IQ a political blunder is just dumb so well ignore that point rather than lose the brain cells. It really isn't. The middle tier is where the discussion starts, other wise people would care far more about Typhon and Pantheon .Your side implied it, since small nations can become big ones right? So then post this same chart starting at the 15 range, or would that hurt the narrative.

Please tell me more about what BK should do, your FA skills are renowned for their success. And if its that big of a deal do something about it.

Income is the best predictive measure of success. All those other variables follow income. There is a very clear narrative here. Posting statistics with no context and commenting on the "dynamic" nature is pushing a narrative.

So is Pantheon more powerful then you and Rose? It's objective remember.

And its still objectively bad measure. Income is the true predictor of success for spheres, and that is much more equitable. Additionally a lot of the alliances included are second tier ties that have not in any way interacted with BK or TCW.

How about they share who is composed of the spheres so we can judge objective fact and reality? Nation count is a bad metric, and their own graphs disprove their point. Unless they are arguing Pantheon is more powerful than KT/TGH/GoB/Guardian combined? Or is perhaps a different narrative at play here.

Who is that counting? Also 1-14 are fairly irrelevant in the war meta so without those its much close regardless of who's actually counting.

Glad to be working with everyone! Hope this is the start of something great!

Thats horribly inefficient and makes embargoes basically unenforceable trying to check 150 peoples embargoes. Members already have sovereignty by being able to vote with their feet, if they dont like the alliance policies they can leave. This is no different than being able to set an alliance tax rate. If thats your solution no one will ever do it and Embargoes will remain a pointless function of the game. Governments already control FA, and embargoes are an extension of FA. This is no different than how it would work in real life. The basis of this games are the alliance not the individual nations. They are citizens of an alliance and the alliance should be able to set "laws" so to speak. In game mechanical enforcement makes life easier and more engaging for the game.

Thats kinda the point. It adds a level of dynamic not just with others but with ones own members. If your members fell its too harsh they will speak up.

Embargoes are an underutilized aspect of P&W, and could become a much impactful area. The solution to this would be to allow alliances to embargo other alliances/individuals. Just as the United States can control if its citizens can trade with Cuba/NK/Iran, alliance leaders should be able to embargo whole other alliances. This would lead to an interesting dynamic and potentially create conflict that could escalate. This would be a new element to trade and create a new political arena with leaders having to balance cutting their own members off from resources, retaliatory trade wars, and the increased tension. This beats the current decentralized nature of embargoes that lacks any real strength.

To address some recent events there will be a special show tomorrow at 11pm ET. Sorry for the late notice.

"I rarely run from a fight, but will do what is best to protect what is mine.The cap is somewhere above 5k infra because the pollution from the improvements are more than any city could handle. In each of the cities I have pollution I can't handle because I maxed out on recycling centers, and my disease rate in my bigger cities are due to a maximum of five hospitals.ICurrent goal is 5,000 infra 10,000 land 20 cities" Thats his thoughts on the subject.

Would be pretty shocking considering how that worked out for NPO the first time around.

As long as this isn’t broken it looks good to me. A more game like feel might help retention.

Last I checked BK has no secret treaties? Unless you know something I don’t?

You mean the secret treaties that were proven to exist? Perhaps you might have forgotten the adamant denial of their existence, and trying to use it as leverage to break other ties. This is the ssdd.

So no change just picking up two top 10 upper tier alliances.