-
Posts
2514 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Kastor
-
-
On 4/22/2024 at 4:39 PM, Kurdanak said:
If someone writes a program for me that generates it all at the tap of a button, will update the program on my every whim, and also let me harvest all the clout of posting it - you've got yourselves a deal. 😌
I still have nightmares of doing everything manually for much of the APR's existence
Kurd I understand but…..this is your baby.
-
Congrats to Chaunce and Tim!
-
Also @Adrienne I personally would like a public response to Sketchy’s question.
- 1
-
On 4/23/2024 at 8:16 PM, Daveth said:
I'm gonna be honest, I find it largely understandable @lancelot1 or anyone would take issue with going along with your claims on TKR, right? Not to say I haven't had my bone to pick with them in the past as well...
But I've often noticed there seems to be a dynamic of FA heads alluding to having evidence of their claims for the sake of posturing and then withholding said evidence for the sake of OPSEC or some other similar concern. This makes it basically impossible for anyone, let alone someone who has no reason to trust you and doubt their government, to be convinced or take your claim of current or past wrongdoing at face value.
From my understanding, there seems to be a chunk of context missing, which makes it more credible to me as an outside observer that you were "bailed out", "rescued", whatever you want to call it, than the proposed alternative you spoke on extensively. So I don't think its entirely unfair to be dismissive or skeptical when the burden of proof is on you? Again I don't even really like @Dr James Wilson either lol.
Wow Daveth this is a terrible post lol
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, Canbec said:Sure can - Rose wanted us to break our NAP in order to bail them out from Eclipse's blitz and we didn't agree.
Next question.
Why did Grumpy ally Rose pre-war? I’ll wait.
- 10
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
15 minutes ago, Canbec said:Lmfao this game is led by wimps
As if a 3.5 month NAP for 1 day of fighting wasn't enough, they somehow find a way to extend it to 6.5 months👌
Tell everyone why we only had a day of fighting.
- 6
- 17
-
Do have to agree with Buor, nuke turrets already had a lot of advantages, to the point where complaints were coming through. Now you’ve buffed that playstyle.
Honestly, atp players should just buy those projects then go to whales and demand they pay them or get nuked. And there’s no real recourse either because with the score range going lower it’s insanely easier to just turret alliances.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Jacob Knox said:Epi thinks we want to fight Camelot? That's hilarious. I don't know about the rest of EVH gov, but Camelot is very low on my list of alliances I'd like to fight next (if they're even in that list).
Well go ahead and share the list with the rest of us
- 9
-
Congratulations Lucas.
- 1
-
Glad to see this got worked out
- 1
-
I agree with Callum
- 1
- 2
-
So we had a lot of interesting discussions last night.
Huge thank you to Velyni Vas (who taught me how to say his name like 3 times).
Not sure what the situation is on recordings, will figure that out going forward. @EpimetheusTalksshould have a bit of it.
Thanks for everyone who showed up, first show peaked 33 people and I believe we had 41(?) unique viewers.
We’ll be back next week with new topics, new guests, and more fun.
shoutout George for getting 3 tickets for speeding.
-
4 minutes ago, Adam II said:
When is it?
Updated my post, apologies. It will be every Thursday going forward at 8pm EST.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Hi all,
Over the course of the last year, it has been of my opinion that the culture and media in PnW has been lacking. While there are some bright spots (Epi's video, Thalmor's radio show, etc) I do believe that its time to move back into the realm of PnW media.
When I had ashland radio, we averaged around 80-100 people, had one of if not the first public interview with @Alex and discussed various political and mechanical events and happenings that were going on.
This will be the same, and I'm honored to be able to host alongside George (Gorge) from Rose.
This week, our first guest will be @Velyni Vas! An experienced FA head with a strong history in the game. We will be discussing:
KTTier Lists
Rundown of the Top 20
Expectations with the projects change.Then if we have time, a general Q&A! (I'll unmute people to ask their questions to Vel)
Looking forward to seeing you all there, it will be hosted here, exclusively, going forward https://discord.gg/eCyJHzFW6u
Big thanks to Seafyre, Velyni, and George!
Oh its
Tomorrow at 8pm est. My bad y'all.
- 9
- 1
- 1
- 5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Two Birds, One Stone my aim is amazing.
- 18
-
1 hour ago, Palsada said:
I would like to add I am 2/2 of alliances subject to my wall of text dismantling and their leaders either quitting or rebranding.
Yes, Mr. NPO, this is a good thing. Drive people from the game. 🙏🏾
-
On 8/28/2023 at 9:42 PM, Kastor said:
There is no reason to believe this.
There is nothing to stop you for just signing TKR again next time they want to start a war. I assume, and others should as well, that you’re just moving with TKR and want to not get targeted for the semi-hegemony you’ve created.
tS, being shitty allies yet again.
I got 15 down votes for this
ahahahahhahahahahahahaha
On 8/29/2023 at 10:12 AM, Lord of Puns said:Did you miss the last few times where t$ rolled TKR, and then TKR rolled t$, and thence again?
I mean I know you’ve been asleep for like 6 years but this is lazy even for you
Ahahahahahahahahahahaha
-
Nice DoE! Glad to be working with you. Cool theme.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I don’t like how you characterized this community. The community is not toxic. You went out of your way to create issues for youself, majority of them being OOC issues, not IC issues.
I will say that people definitely didn’t give you any benefit of the doubt when things truly weren’t your fault but your post makes it seem like you feel you were innocent in all these things, you weren’t.
Unlike others, I do think you were a a blessing to have and play this game with. I do hope you re-roll, and come back a more steady, stable, and level-headed version of yourself. I nominated you for player of the year one year, because I thought you did good/have that potential.
- 1
- 16
- 2
-
Great to be working with you!
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, The Titan said:
First
Also I think TFP and Sing are the ones collecting the trash, lolCmon darkblade, you can do better
Aren’t you from BK?
- 4
-
3 hours ago, Arthur Wellington said:
I may have misread or misunderstood but, why are the votes of 'alliance representatives' a thing? If this is an actual thing a few follow up questions,
1. Which alliances?
2. Which people exactly?
3. Why these alliances?
4. Why these people?
5. Why is this listed first and not the OWF vote?
6. Can these votes be complelty seperate next year so not to mix anything up?
7. Better yet, next year, don't have a separate vote, one person, one vote?
It started back under me, actually. I ran the awards when it was owf voting, but it became a popularity contest. So I closed off voting until after during the NEXT awards that I ran. Since then others have taken it over(Never again) and made the process way simpler and easier.
-
7 hours ago, Eumirbago said:
I’m living under the blessings of @Keegoz’s patience
- 1
- 2
-
Why did you use that font?
Adding counterplays to turrets
in Game Suggestions
Posted
I actually think this is a solid problem, and I believe that @Alex should do this to address it:
Old:
Tactician :Double chance to destroy improvements, defensive spy ops are 15% less successful
Guardian: Half chance to have improvements destroyed, lose 20% more loot
NEW:
Tactician: 50% chance to destroy improvements on every attack. Take 10% more Infra Damage.
Guardian: -25% Chance to destroy improvements on every attack. Raises expenses 1%.
Reasoning: Guardian/Tactician aren't really opposites of each other and it isn't clear how many "double" is. A simple fix is to give a standard 50% on EVERY attack to destroy improvements. But give a downside.
So it creates a good "mini game" If you want to counter nuke turretting, that's fine but you miss out on other things to do it. On top of that you take more damage dismantling the raiders than you would have from just moving on/paying. So it creates a choice and an easy one at that. It still gives Nuke Turrets a viable gameplay, but allows coordinated alliances to take them down.
TLDR: ALLOWS ALL attacks to have a chance to destroy improvements, caps it at 50% chance, going Guardian can lower that chance to 25%, however it raises costs which can hurt you nuke turretting.