Buorhann

I'm not sure who's worse. Us in Mensa coming out of the wood work and being all Mensa, or BoC members following Mensa around like a bunch of groupies.

In regards to the first point: We'd let our diplomats decide that matter. If they say "Move on", we move on. It's happened early when we started, of course on a small scale. Couple of grumblings, but we all worked together to patch things up and move on together. I mean, I personally had a issue happen, but moved on when told to do so, no problem. We come from a culture that... well, we've been beaten down before, and rebuilt from it - several times, mind you. I'd like to think ( And I'm really only speaking from my perspective ) that we'd accept it and move on. Looking at your war log, it shows you got hit by one Mensa member and there was a truce.

In-character? Well, would be fun on a roleplay bit, but not everybody plays games for the roleplay aspect.

I worry for you, honestly. If you get this worked up over a trivial matter on a internet browser game to the point you have to throw out insults, when you're not even directly involved.

Vlad's mad.

Obviously we should've paid full reparations ( Both nation and alliance bank losses ) directly to Hereno, and not the nations that were hit. Right?

I like how you're still here after your involvement of raiding your previous alliance's bank. ( Kastor )

Yay economy boost on the trade market!

I just find it amusing you're in every thread that Mensa HQ is mentioned. I like you being a groupie. What consequences are we facing?

I'm pretty sure Mensa HQ will be ok. It seems that whatever wrong we do is against smaller alliances that think we should cater to their demands and don't understand negotiations and compromises. I mean, Pfeiffer could've told him to bugger off. At the very least he attempted to negotiate till he was attacked. SI didn't even retaliate against the raiders, and that could've been much more understandable than attacking our leader.

Cult of geniuses!

Codius was last active on the 5th, and the raids hit on the 10th. Others were recently active. So what was the problem with them sending a message to Pfeiffer?

I'm not denying anything. I'm with you cg, the Prince of Saiyans.

And my bow vote.

10/10 cg, never change man. You're awesome.

He's working on Most Favorite Player of the Month award now by attacking Pfeiffer. That's the real reason.

I think our dedication to Dio is pretty absolute.

In which a smaller alliance making demands to a bigger alliance to pay up. Pfeiffer offered a compromise to settle the situation. Have the nations that were attacked to send him a message and he would personally pay them back. They didn't. Instead, he got attacked. The "raiders" didn't get attacked. He did, after he tried to compromise with them.

That's a wild idea?

Well harminator, did you enjoy Noir with the brief time you were a part of it after the GPA war?

I just find it amusing that Pfeiffer always offers to pay reparations, either personally or through our alliance bank, to nations that message him if they get raided. This guy wanted all the money taken from the inactives/quasi-actives instead. Not the alliance bank that was taken, but the personal bank that was taken. All he had to do was tell his members to message Pfeiffer and he would've ponied it up.

The Seven Kingdoms is my favorite alliance. Only because of the fancy signatures and the roleplay-esque feel to their messages.

What is your IQ? You could qualify for Mensa HQ.

Hippo is happy to see this prediction. Please let it happen. It'll give us some good experience.

Where's my message?