Sinister

"well, for the first part. he definitely could have sold if he wanted to. Ive talked to him and we've come to an agreement that he isnt upset and the level of control he has is good. for the second. I mean, its far easier to do internal transfers than it is to just send money over. we have all of the stuff recorded behind the scenes, where it really matters, but we prefer doing it that way there. for the third. im not sure why arctic thinks that MERC is a dead company for one. it fully launched what, a week or two ago? for GNPI, its specifically geared towards larger companies, bigger contracts. less tickets is normal oh, and for SOSE that was during when we had some issues with lysander, all is sorted now however. - reply of Neo Kas And Arctic's response. "All of NeoKas' arguments are flawed tbh A lot of the evidence I posted was literally posted today... So whatever his argument is [it] is based on outdated evidence" Replies from Taith and Arctic respectively. Posting this here to make things easier for everyone. All credit to Shashwat and OMN for the report.

Definitely interesting to say the least. Can't wait to see the rest of the info as well.

I agree, this would a great improvement.

Says he's tired, then immediately proceeds to make a forum post lol. Rest up man.

@Young Guilo You're really embarrassing yourself and Liberty now. If not for yourself, have some consideration and stop for the others.

No hard feelings. Best of luck to you guys in your future endeavors.

Best of luck guys!

I agree, our conflicting views converges on whether discussing the creation of the new alliance with active members constituted poaching. My understanding of the OP is that the agreement was to allow things to proceed naturally. If members wanted to leave they were free to, but that had to be their own decision - without Speedy's influence. I feel that if you start up a conversation and then just "happen" to mention your new alliance, you're doing that with the intent to get said person into your alliance. In my book, that's not kosher, but you believe that falls into the natural category. I can respect that, even if I disagree with it. Either way, I wanted to point on what I thought about the topic and to see what others thought about the situation. PS: And no disrespect intended; I'll still be tuning into the show if it's up again this week.

@zigbigadorlou Sorry Zig, but I disagree with you a bit on this one. I'm new to the alliance and the game in general, but my personal opinion is that if Speedy agreed to those conditions while he was in our alliance, it's no different than if he had accepted a loan from us and then bailed. We'd still ask him to be bound by the rules he had agreed to initially, and if he refused, there would have to be repercussions. This should be doubly true if he's going to the head of a new alliance; if you're going to be a leader, your word is held to a higher standard than normal since it includes those who you're supposed to represent. In this case, the condition was that he wasn't to discuss this new alliance with other members actively and he did so anyways. So he broke his own word and there has to be some kind punishment for that. At least, that's my take on the situation.

Timeline of the events. Here for reference. Bottom page is first and then moves to top page in terms of time.

There seems to be a bug in the amount displayed that you're getting from rewarded ads. The actual payout system seems to be working properly though, as it has sent me the capped income notification for the day. A small interface error, but one that should be easy enough to fix.

Good to be working with you guys!

I agree with this idea as well.