Greene

This is an extremely useful idea and I hope it is implemented right away!

Or maybe do the reverse of this. Once alliances get a lot of members, perhaps instead of seeing who HAS read the message, which would of course be most members, we could have who HAS NOT read the message. This way it'll be a much shorter list, and the alliance gov. can then easily send a message to them directly. Also I would think this could be a minimized thing, similar to the way the [?] are handled.

Can we make this an optional thing? Cyber Nations (are we allowed to say the name of another game when referencing an idea that is similar? Well, I hope I don't get yelled at...) has something similar, in that you have the option you can set that lets you hover over something to get more links. It's great if you're on a Desktop or Laptop, but if you're on a mobile device (ipad, surface?, or phone of any kind) that requires you to use your finger to do the navigating, it can be a pain in the arse.

That's a good point, so maybe set up limitations to it? Something like it only automatically moves folks who have signed in within the last x days, the alliance continues to exist with a note indicating it merged for the next I dont know, maybe 7 days and that members must either move over or leave within that time frame? I noticed that the main issue with merging alliances is that the leader, or someone with power, has to remain behind. This can be a complication when in mergers, the leaders usually get some form of government. Thoughts?

Maybe a compromise. since having too many things be donation options ultimately turns folks off (see another game that tried and failed with bakuza donation options) The first name change is free, and after that it's a donation option?

Currently the only method of merging two alliances is for all bank assets to be withdrawn by someone with access and then deposited into the new alliance account, and all members have to manually move over to the new alliance. Now this of course weeds out inactives, but I've always thought there had to be an easier/better/more efficient way to do this. Could we get a system that would allow two alliances to merge, one into the other? All members would be moved over to the new alliance, and all bank assets would be transferred, either in lump sum, or the new alliance would take ownership of the old alliance's transactions?

I noticed that alliances use ID's just like nations. I see we can change the nation name up to once. So I'm wondering if we could have the ability to change the alliance's name? To be honest, I'm wondering if we could have the alliance name changed either whenever we wanted or, barring that, every I dunno 30 or 60 days?

Nation Name: Resvernas Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=8360

I like Windows, but Windows 8 took me a lot of getting used to.

I'm re-reading all the Harry Potter books right now. I'm on Half Blood Prince. I've been re-reading all of my Kindle & Nook books, it's fun.

Every time I log into PW, I find myself informed that I have less than the recommended amount of military. I'm well aware of this fact, and I don't intend on raising my military any further just yet. I keep pressing the little X, but next time I log in, it's back. Is there a way to stop that notification from coming up without buying more military?

Voted for Cyradis, cause why not