Jump to content

Leonard J Crabs

No Matching Nation
  • Posts

    288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Leonard J Crabs

  1. Then we shall find a format Alex agrees to and hold them that way.
  2. I have no problems with the admin of the game deciding who gets what awards. If it's a community vote, it should be held how it's always been done, and not changing the format simply because someone's feelings are hurt or because those that believe they are above others think they should have more voting power than new players.
  3. It's simple. If the old guard don't hold an awards ceremony simply because they aren't in control of the vote, GOONS will hold one for the will of the people. If those in power think that they can ignore the will of the people, we will seize the means of meaningless awards.
  4. how is a bunch of individuals voting for a poll "changing the results of this poll"?
  5. Start campaigning then. A vote isn't legitimate because charismatic individuals can garner votes from individuals.
  6. Have you tried talking to goons to see if they have individual thoughts and feelings and would vote differently if you greased a few palms? For the record, my vote is up for sale.
  7. I don't see how everyone having one vote is "spam", but spin it however you want.
  8. So you think that what you want to happen is binding, but not the will of the community. If the majority of the game wants to hold awards, it should happen. Not just because you or anyone thinks they shouldn't happen. It's ridiculous to believe that any member of this community should have more sway over a democratic voting process than anyone else. If the old guard in this game refuse to hold the awards, GOONS will. The decision on whether there should be in game awards on display will be up to Alex.
  9. Cool, we should have a democratic vote on whether we should even hold awards. See how that goes.
  10. Because you have ulterior motives. You want to nuke the awards because people you don't like in the community have a numbers advantage. If we remove the awards system so that the people you don't like can't get any awards, we should get rid of the awards, period. It's only fair.
  11. Right, they don't mean anything, so let's remove them. If somehow this years awards are illegitimate, we should remove the incentive to host them. Purge the clutter on meaningless awards on people's pages.
  12. Then we should take out the in game awards that show up on nation and alliance pages if we're gonna end it.
  13. Right, because that's how people like you work. If you can't have it the way you want it, you destroy it instead. Goons will probably end up holding their own awards anyways, along with the war crimes trials.
  14. We are clearly a democratic peoples republic. We are acutely aware of democracy.
  15. There is nothing wrong with democracy and there never was. Democracy has always been the clearly best governmental system.
  16. You sure are concerned about disenfranchising the majority though.
  17. So, its been direct democracy every year. Goons and GPWC become a thing, now there's a push to disenfranchise the majority of votes. Please, tell me how concerned you are for the rights of the community.
  18. Democracy is good until it doesn't work out to our favor. We clearly need a republic and representatives to strip the voting rights of the majority.
  19. ground units in general are worthless in global wars, they're only good for raiding. Allowing the enemy into beige to rebuild is to be avoided at all costs.
  20. Imagine being so triggered by downvotes being removed you have to post two threads about it.
  21. easy to play dead when you bleed membership and pretend you're playing dead.
  22. the ITC is profitable at 5k infra and 1 city, I don't know what to tell you. You should study game mechanics.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.