Ace

Haha... Alright-alright. I'll give you more of my "observations". Before that I am just making sure. Would this be sufficient for you?

The word evidence is becoming very subjective in this thread. Kinda like not believing in electricity simply because I can't see it. If I can't see what I want then it's not an hard-evidence! Which in fact all the non-hard(according to some) & non-visual evidence proves that electricity makes all the appliances work... but NO! I can't see it! So IDGAF, there is no hard-evidence it's not electricity! Very subjective this term evidence. At this case some people here defined an IRC/text screenshot as an hard evidence and completely ignoring the case where the plotter DON'T use any IRC or in-game text systems. If that will be your stance then I am sorry we can't do business. It could seem that way like how Thulium posted. But it's just truth. I did spend some time to research on this and if anyone is willing I will share it with them. Plain and simple.

As I stated before it's negotiable. I don't mind proving my deductive reasoning. However, I am burdened on on the part where I have to actually mention one or more of the suspects. But alright let's see... If I say 1 thing that isn't mentioned before in this thread. That is logically correct. That would suffice for you? PS: Again evidence or worthless information is subjective... Brown University seem to think that this method of analysis is completely valid.

Yes I know some richies have that much money, in fact some made much-more in a day. I didn't ask for an unreasonable amount of cash. Haha, alright bro. We can talk it out in private. Maybe we can work something out or explain to me more what specifically is this solid-proof of my skills that you are looking for. Because I really only used some observation and deductive reasoning for the most part and that's enough to figure out who are the suspects.

Nothing like easy money! Do transfer it

I vouch to disagree on the "something worthless" part. Sure everyone in this thread deduced that someone has an "agenda". That's a no-brainer. The real question is... what "exactly" are their agenda? and "why" do they have that agenda? what is the "benefit" for them? I am ready to answer all these questions for anyone willing to make an offer. In addition to my list of suspects I have those reasons/motivations attached to those suspects in my Intel.

Lol Deductive Reasoning isn't mind reading alright xD it takes real effort. So far I've already demonstrated my reasoning from the OP's post and observing the current standings of nations, alliances and relationships between alliances in the PnW universe. If you would read my first post. Honestly I already gave a few *hint hint* away at that post. Ofcourse. Not all definitely. I believe I have demonstrated enough of my reasoning skills. The rest of my services is up to the curiosity of the public. PS: And by saying "Deduce some stuff about me" do you mean you want me to deduce if you are a suspect or not? I have an answer. But then again I have also stated. I would not say this in public because I would not want to make any enemies here... I am just offering my services.

Short-answer: A felony won't tell a cop they did it. A suspect isn't going to tell the detective they did it. That's why they are called "detectives" because they detect- stuff that makes a suspect suspected. As I said, all I have is "a list of suspects". What you will do with it is up to you. Long-answer: Deductive Reasoning Joshua Schechter Brown University Deductive reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which, roughly, the truth of the input propositions (the premises) logically guarantees the truth of the output proposition (the conclusion), provided that no mistake has been made in the reasoning. The premises may be propositions that the reasoner believes or assumptions that the reasoner is exploring. For example, a reasoner who infers from the beliefs (i) If the room is dark then either the light switch is turned off or the bulb has burned out; (ii) The room is dark; (iii) The light switch is not turned off; Conclusion: (iv) The bulb has burned out; is reasoning deductively. If the three premises are true, the conclusion is guaranteed to be true. Cite: http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Philosophy/onlinepapers/schechter/DeductiveReasoning.pdf --- But then again, I will say again. If that will STILL be your stance, I respect that. You have every right to not purchase my services sirs.

If that will be your stance on our Intel. Then we apologize sir that we couldn't do business unless you would offer a much fairer price.

Will do. However, it's just business sir... a man's gotta eat... And I would not like to make any enemies here by boldly-stating names... All I am is just a free agent after all... You come to me with a mystery to solve. All I do is provide my intel services for a fee. Just working Professionally. A Neutral Fixer nor do I wish to assist any "particular" parties involved in this incident and taking sides. I have an asking price of 800,000 for this piece of Intel. I am willing to sell this piece of information to anyone. (including any curious richies other than the BoC. Yes-sir, I am neutral. I am not biased against any of my clients.) Please feel free to contact me in private if you would like to do business or negotiate (:

I sense heat... and friction... building up... Anyways, my 2 cents would be... only someone rich would be able to pull off those kinds of "expensive" *hint hint* espionage attacks. Someone who holds a economy, has an agenda and has some "political power" to influence the game universe... no normal/newbie nation/alliance would be able to pull this off. I have no IRC/text so called "solid-proof" as you've mentioned, because frankly if these plotters were any smarter they would use something like skype, whatsap, email etc. wouldn't they? (anybody learnt anything from the casus bellis of WWI between TAC and TC?) Again, I have no IRC/text solid-proof. But from logic-deduction I have a list of suspects and reasoning what they are suspects. I have only shared with you the tip-of the iceberg of my Intel... I will share you my full thoughts and analysis... For a price... ofcourse... Just offering my services as a free agent (;

Congrats. I only wish for all to prosper, peace and justice. PS: Hansarius is a friendly leader. That's good to know.

I sense so much pessimism here. lol

I agree. The tank page should be more descriptive. And overall. Many great answers in here! Thanks

Is it worth the amount of 30000 + steel to make the factory + $/steel to buy the tanks + gaseline to operation them. Or Its better just to spend 30000 to buy 10 barracks and will cost less to train the troops? But I guess I kinda understand. To save building slots it will cost more anyways.

Nation Name: 300 Spartans Nation Link: ID: http://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=6206 THIS IS MADNESS!!!!

1) Which is better in your view? 2) And why? Explain and defend your opinion with arguments! Basically I am making this topic because I don't think this is actually addressed anywhere else. I've checked the tuts or the forum. And the specs to how useful tanks are actually are isn't described in the Military>Tanks anyway other than "dramatically increase the effectiveness of soldiers" a good question would be "how dramatically?" Munitions for Soldiers are clearly defined and well. 1.75x effectiveness for the price of 600-1000$ (market average price for Munitions). That's a HUGE gain. But until someone can explain why Soldier+Tank army is better than a full Soldier with Munitions army. I wouldn't bother the super high cost of building a Factory and buying the 1500+ priced steel and gasoline to use it. That's my take. Now, whose gonna prove me wrong? (Or right, lol)

Well thats how the world works! Life isn't fair! Thats why Dubai is tax-free and so rich. CAUSE GAS! Lol xD