Stanislaw Sikorski

Buying 10 steel and 23 aluminium for $1000 per ton.

Quite obvious. Two hours is enough anyway, the line for acceptable waiting time for me is every day.

Definitely no. Background music would be good with other games but not this kind of game.

I'm for this idea. It'll create more complex gameplay and strategy as it will allow players to focus in one particular skill tree and most likely have most of their development spending there. The perks for the capital city will affect newer nations a lot as everything is still relatively cheap for them and the boost will be significant but won't be as great with older nations.

Being a nation located in Poland in-game and with the nation name as Polska, all my justifications for my wars are written with Polandball grammar, although I think I could make them a bit funnier if I was more creative about it. Most people I attack are inactive so it doesn't matter too much anyway and for my own entertainment when I look back at all the reasons for my wars. Also hi Konstantinurov. Too bad Poland cannot into space in this game, at least I can into Germany. Or rather Charlie's nation which is misspelt "Sith Empie" with a German flag.

I might message you soon for that offer, now that it's Winter I'm not producing enough food. It may be because of the war I'm having, once it ends and I still don't produce enough food I'll message you.

After looking at your nation again you're no longer an applicant of TAC. What happened?

Never thought you would actually show up on this thread. I thought you would see it then carry on being "mysterious" and leave us all wondering. Anyway, I agree with how you moderate.

How do I send money in-game to another nation?

Has anyone actually seen Mr. Blonde writing a post that wasn't for moderation? I've seen Sheepy active in debates by members of the community but Mr. Blonde is mysterious with short posts such as "Duplicate topic. Locked." Yes, I realise mysterious is probably what he was going for. I know this sems like something boring to talk about but I haven't said anything for a while here.

Anyone heard of Paulo Coelho? Probably my favourite author. I've been told not many people think he's a good author in Brazil though, no idea why.

I spent on resources for power first then sold a bit of it for money. I used the money to invest in resources that had rising prices. Average prices are dropping and in less demand so not so much of a good idea anymore. I would spend on commerce first before spending on other resources that aren't for fuel. I'd start off with a supermarket first before buying a bank if I were you.

Destabilizing a country is a problem although I don't think the problem is the conflict itself but rather what we do after the conflict that ruins everything in the nation. If it was planned how everything would run after civil war, then the nation wouldn't go into anarchy like in Iraq.

Let's have some discussion back to the original debate. Freedom fighters can make a change in their nation with the proper supplies needed for them. If there was an organisation that decided to do something about the oppression, it could work better than petitions for the countries with dictators who are unwilling to listen. Petitions can only go so far, a human rights lawyer in Iran was released from prison after a petition was signed, at the time the new president of Iran claimed he would improve the human rights record. If politicians are unwilling to listen, petitions won't work so violent force would be needed as a last resort.

You're right about that. I'd rather we didn't say anything that could be seen as offensive to Muslims, I don't want an admin ending this debate because we went into a controversial topic.

Back to the original debate, we all know that politicians being crazy for power won't go liberating if they don't gain anything from it. The citizens have to do something about their own freedom but they're prevented from promoting human rights by being imprisoned. I agree with the aim of Amnesty International, if politicians don't do anything, citizens from all around the world have to. I just don't think petitions is enough of an effort to change dictatorships such as the military junta in Thailand into a liberal government.

Agreed with all of those, especially for the last one. Iraq didn't rename themselves, a terrorist organisation called ISIS started to occupy territories in Iraq. Do some research on where what ISIS is and where they came from.

If we planned out what to do with a nation after liberation then it wouldn't go into chaos like Iraq. I agree it's not as easy as it sounds as nuclear weapons make everything harder. However rather than steamrolling into North Korea, using necessary force and support from the people within NK would help. Very unlikely this could happen unless anyone else has an idea.

Liverpool.

Price of aluminium is dropping, bad and good as I invested in some aluminium so I'm not making profit but at least I'll be able to buy aluminium for nation growth at a cheap price.

Yes Wilhelm, you're right. By we, I mean the people that agree human rights violations can't continue and we should do something about it. This doesn't mean everyone, having an opinion is not enough. It requires devotion of time and resource to be part of "we." Seeing as I don't do much myself, "we" was the wrong word to use in this case. It would've been much better if I said "Amnesty International and the human rights activists around the world." Who would do that though?

Countries like North Korea have poor human rights records. There's nothing to gain though by invading these countries to remove the dictators from power. Charities like Amnesty International and several human rights activists are peacefully trying to improve conditions for people around the world but are they doing enough? Could we do more to enforce human rights than petitions?

He's most likely left the forum by now. It seems pointless for the rest of us to carry on replying to him.

Hi.

Hi, I'm new too.