Olive Penderghast

Not really. People will have their threads locked and possibly be given a verbal/warning for violating the rules the Moderation team have already set into place. Theres no reason for it. If they violate the rule, the Mod team will redirect them to the Rules and Guideline post. There is no reason to exclude members who can't be as active as you, or what you believe to be "smart" enough to be included. I don't appreciate you making comments implying that you are more intelligent than the person who may be a full time student or a full time worker, that has barely any time to be on PnW. Life > PnW and I will not have a rule that will exclude anybody. In my opinion, it still falls in the God-modding guidelines. Literally still does not need a separate thread for Free-Consent players. The only thing the free-consent slip does is take away your right to report when someone attacks or includes you in their RP without your direct consent, the rest of the rules still apply, and will be enforced either way.

I'm fine with it being a week. I just don't agree with it being only 1 day.

There is no reason to have two rules that are essentially the same. Everyone is still required to follow every rule and Guidelines found here: The only except is the consent rule, and that only applies to people who have signed up for the Free Consent Signup that strips the need for consent. You can find the people on this list here: Too short of a window, some people have lives outside of PnW. Three days is where I'll accept a time limit. Wouldn't this follow the Godmodding rule in the Official Rules and Guidelines...?

Never.

While I do understand your points, this should of been requested before being posted. This could of been an easy backfire without an official moderator to back this. Without moderation, you couldn't have enforced this and we wouldn't have been obligated to uphold these new rules that allow to waiver the consent rule. I could of easily said "lol this wasn't discussed and will uphold the consent rule if reports came in." I am trying to be lenient on most things, reasoning why I have already decided to endorse this list, which effectively makes this list official and will handle reports accordingly to this. I am just saying before players start adding their own set of rules, it needs to be discussed with the Moderation Team and approved, and I will definitely consider anything you guys send to my PMs, or any posts made in the OOC Discussion area. That is all I am saying. I do appreciate the initiative in this thread, and glad that ideas like this one can be set into motion, but like all rules and guidelines, it should be discussed with a moderator.

You are not in the Moderation staff member, and we didn't have to endorse this at all and easily could still follow old rules. I was on the process of changing the entire consent rule but this makes it easier for me, so I endorsed it. Any changes that woule be contradictory to the current set of rules must be taken to moderation team first. However I did endorse this and everyone on this list forfeit their right to report a violation to the consent rule as long as they follow the guidelines shown on your original post.

No, but I decided to endorse this with a warning to not add any new rules without moderation approval.

I'm gonna go ahead and endorse this, but further rules will need to be approved by the official Moderation Team. If you have any rules you think are worthy, let me know and the Moderation Team will consider it. Mostly me, as I have decided to take more action in the National Affairs subforums. /pinned and endorsed by your local lawyer.

Question: How do you guys want to handle the consent rule. Mogar you wanted the consent rule rewritten. Thalmor agrees on a less restrictive consent rule. What I am going with this is I am planning to completely rewrite the consent rule, but I need to know the majority of the players opinions.

So, where are we heading with the consent rule?

I can see your point. I just fear of a major backlash if I allow direct attacks to happen without consent. If you can get a petition of this, and can get the majority to agree. I'll change the rule. Until then direct attacks are forbidden. Without consent.

The only consent thing im going to require is direct attacks on said nation. If you mass genocide their people in your own borders, I am not gonna give you a warn point. If you send missiles through their borders that doesn't hit them, I will not give a warn point out for that either. Thats as far of a removal im going to allow the consent rule to be. If you want a completely free RP from a Consent Rules, I highly suggest you join Organic RP. It's a great subforums that is less restrictive than NatRP.

Depinned, this is an eye sour. Please visit this one instead https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/20285-natrp-guidelines-and-rulesplease-read-before-posting/

Attention NatRP Players! Here is a box you can suggest new rules to be added to the NatRP Guidelines and Rules for NatRP! Serious suggestions only, I will purposely ignore you if you joke around. Sorry for short topic, Im too lazy to write a paragraph for a simple suggestion box

I am planning to set new guidelines for NatRP to follow. Give me time to set up a new and improved rule set, and get the ball rolling.

What a mess

What a cesspool. Alice is currently resigning the Moderation Team and asked for me to take over the Map Rule thread. I agree, from this point, farewell gifts will no longer exist. If you leave NatRP, you lose your lands and they are open to be claimed by new players. However the damage has been done and I will not enforce Lelouch to remove the lands in question. /Problem Solved.