Aisha Greyjoy

I'm saying, when the EC differs from the popular vote, it should go Republican because of how Rural voters are more important in the EC then urban voters.. I'm saying, these elections have all been close and that's not a good reason to get rid of the EC. The EC is there to stop guys like Trump. Of course, our electors are probably too cowardly to do their duty and put in 2 dozen votes for Pence to send it to the House floor.

What about hindu's? I mean, they look the same, right? And those Sikh's with turbans, them too. And those darker skinned people next door, they could be muslim. If this doesn't disturb the right, ask yourself, "how would you feel if they wanted to register all gun owners"

Too bad there is no LiquidMercury here to lead the losers to their karmic promised land. Or is that who you think you are, Prefontaine?

Never trust RT. Its essentially Russian government official news.

Gosh, the way you describe it, Fascism doesn't sound so bad. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/ I think its clear that "by large numbers" could mean 10% even. Its a meaningless term. Trump did well with whites of all education levels, but he underpeformed with white college educated people compared to non college educated.

Yes, and the Electoral College is supposed to intervene when an unqualified person is supported by the people.

You're right. Calling all Fascists Nazi's isn't entirely accurate. Although, the Trump crowd wanting a Muslim registry reminds me strongly of having Jews wear the star of David on their clothes in the Third Reich. Nazism was a branch of Fascism I'm sure there's books exploring the differences. For most purposes, I think its "close enough" to lump them together.

Well, Republican voters in Utah, Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Idaho... All these teensy states whose population is really worth about 1 electoral vote...they get 3. So I think that favors Republicans. Looking at recent history, Hillary Clinton should win by nearly 1M popular votes, but the EC says Trump wins(unless they do the unthinkable). In 2000, Gore won by more then 500,000 votes, but the EC(and the Supreme Court) said Bush wins. So, twice in recent history, when the EC broke from the popular vote, it went to the Republican. Two times is not a compelling trend, to be sure. And these are close votes really. I don't have a problem if a close vote breaks one way or the other. I would have a HUGE PROBLEM with a 40/60 split going to the side that got 40 though.

As a HRC voter, I support the electoral college. It goes against my specific policies, in that it is more likely to enable Republicans to win then Democrats, but that is a temporary wind of the season. Our constitutional framework is a balance of democracy and checks on the power of the people. I advise everyone who wants it gone to read a few of the federalist papers and then rethink it.

The people here saying "use inforwars as a legit source" don't deserve my best logic. It would be wasted on them. Of course you're getting a basic problem of "some Republicans are nazis, you're a Republican, so you're a nazi", is obviously untrue. But the "stench" of being associated with nazis is real. And the effective anti-globalist movement is being led by neo-nazis across Europe as well, so you aren't going to see the anti-globalist crowd get rid of the association quickly. There has been a left-wing anti-globalist movement for more then 3 decades, but it has largely been ineffective, and conservatives laughed and cheered when police cracked the skulls of anti-globalist protesters, so I don't see them coming together anytime soon.

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/04/30/donald-trump-wins-key-ku-klux-klan-endorsement-video/ http://www.dailystormer.com/the-daily-stormer-endorses-donald-trump-for-president/ Better? Trump's endorsements from the KKK and the American Neo-Nazi group Stormfront are easy to find. Call liberals Commies if you want, but Nazi's really sticks to the GOP types now. It'll be years before the GOP can get the stench of white supremacy off itself.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/9/7/1419159/-StormFront-Endorses-Trump https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/11/01/the-kkks-official-newspaper-has-endorsed-donald-trump-for-president/ Nope, Nazi's are strictly pro-Trump

Actually, the electoral college is there so that "learned individuals" can override the votes of their lessors. From the Federalist Papers See, the role of the Electoral College is to prevent someone like Trump from being elected.

What a gift that would be to President Trump.

I think France and the Netherlands have a strong rising extreme-right wing. I think Austria and Italy will not have much change in that direction. Austria is still too scarred by having happily joined the Third Reich to so freely re-embrace racialist politics. France has been mauled by jihadis lately, and that will probably give the right some serious points. Even if they don't win, they'll be strong enough to either be brought in as a partner with the center-right party or they'll be the main opposition party if the center right and center left form a coalition.

Why not just send people to Stormfront or the KKK website?

There are two main lines of thought I am working with right now.. #1. We have to treat Trump better then Obama was treated by !@#$ Republicans because we're morally superior to them and unlike them, we respect our system of government which requires compromise and working together. #2. We have to fight Trump with everything we have on every single issue because the Republicans have essentially declared war on Democrats and the Constitution. We can't keep playing nice when dealing with psychotic nutjobs(and by psychotic nutjobs, I don't mean Trump, I mean many Republicans). I'm going with #1 for now. But I'm really just a few shakes short of going #2. I guess the protesters are already there. As an individual, what would #2 mean for me? Sorry dudes, I live in the burbs and have a job. Not going to any downtown protests, nor do I see the point. You want to get #2 going? Become a precinct committeeman. Run for office. My district didn't even have a Democrat running for State Representative this time. Meaningful actions is how you affect change. Also, buy some guns. No telling when the psychotic nutjobs will start a civil war, and you don't want to be disarmed when that happens.

I got offered a job there once. And I was like, "WTF, is that in Kentukistan? No way". And the said, "No, its in Tennesistan", and so I almost took it, but then declined, because, you know, I'm not ready to lie down with goats and siblings like those folks down there do.

The Chola is um, a lot smaller then the United Kingdom.

There have been dozens if not hundreds of attacks on muslims, blacks and mexicans since the election by Trump supporters. That does not excuse violence against anyone. Take your outrage somewhere else.

You asked, I answer. I think people have a right to protest. I think its stupid though. We had an election. There's no credible allegations the election was unfair or that Trump cheated somehow. Trump is going to be our president. All of us who are Americans. Just like Obama was the president of KKK members who hated him. Unlike them, I'll be rooting for Trump to succeed, because I'm American before I'm anti-Trump. I'm disgusted with your tone, as usual. "Grab a woman by her !@#$ and throw her out of the country" because you disagree with her? Whatever. Just more shock jock Howard Stern type level commentary from you.

There is nothing to fight. The GOP has the House, Senate, White House, and shortly, the Supreme Court. This is a total rout for Democrats and a total win for Republicans. Pretending anything else is a waste of time. The only "fight" will be for 2018, when the party out of power typically gets a big win in both legislative chambers. Really, its time to go back to work and hope they don't !@#$ things up too badly and try and win next time.

Congratulations to the Trump supporters. You guys fought hard for this.

Given that the CDC is led by political appointees, I can see some validity in keeping the CDC from doing the research. (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Politics/story?id=3235565&page=1) This from 2007 shows the CDC doing very pro-republican things when led by a Bush appointee, so its clearly not laser focused on just health, but includes political considerations. See Wisdomtree, honest people with different opinions and open minds can change their opinions on things when presented with good facts. Its not game over for us all yet.

The whole Ukrainian revolution thing looked a lot like a western plot. To a paranoid mind, it is 100% a cia plot to take Ukraine from Russia's sphere. To a more neutral viewpoint, it looks at least 50% likely western intelligence agencies supported and encouraged the revolution to ditch Yanakuvich(sp, sorry).