Memph

I don't think there's any ulterior motives... Alpha's infra damages for June 13 to June 28 were only $1.4 billion, that's not going to make a huge dent in the overall numbers.

Or us when we steal it again.

The earlier stages of the Alpha-t$ probably can't be included due to the fact that those wars don't show up in the war history. If those aren't included, I don't think it makes sense to include wars Alpha was in from May 30 to June 12. But I think it would make sense to include wars Alpha was in from June 13 to June 28.

Using Yoso's stats for military units killed and cash taken and lost and combining with my infra damage stats. I also used $2800 for steel and $2200 for alum, and subtracted loot stolen from damages taken and subtracted cash lost from damages dealt. Wars involving Alpha are included in the infra damage stats of Alpha's opponents, and same goes for infra damage in wars involving Storm Division's opponents (random little wars involving unaligneds, etc also) even though SD and Alpha don't have their own row since Yoso didn't post their military unit and cash stats. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GEt1Hdiw3rwft5JhPh_Ui3SGbrWf5NaaHmFjb1J_r5Y/edit?usp=sharing tl;dr: Mensa rises to the #1 spot and Paracovenant side now stands at $80 billion in losses.

Infra damage stats using all losses that occurred from June 13 to June 28: I'm pretty sure Yosodog's numbers assumed that the value of each infra lost was the same, when obviously some nations had more valuable infra than others. Also don't entirely agree with the steel ($3500) and alum ($1600) values Yoso used. Average prices over the last 2 months were around $2800 for steel, $2200 for alum and although the values were higher during the war, the steel:alum ratios were still closer to 2800:2200 than 3500:1600. Regarding cash, I think there's a good argument that it should be not just a loss for the side losing it, but a gain for the opposite side, since the overwhelming majority of cash lost was through ground attacks, not airstrikes.

Congrats TKR! o/

10 million tanks died during the production of this war.

Wow we actually didn't get countered this time. Time to buy some cheap resources.

Sparta and Guardian have an MDP: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/13393-the-laconic-accords/

Stats for the Mensa-UPN front as of 1 hour ago.

I lost about 110% of my infra last war, but only about 80% this time, so I guess you guys need to try harder.

Here's how the Rose/VE blitz looked like between the first war dec by Rose at 11pm game time and 2am game time. Rose 69 offensive wars by 36 nations 58 defensive wars VE 17 offensive wars by 9 nations 66 defensive wars Maybe VE decided to stop launching offensive wars when they saw TKR were countering them while Rose just kept going?

Cumulative number of cities based on number of cities per nation. Ex if you have an 18, 19, 19 and 20 city nation, that would be 20 cities at 20+ 58 cities at 19+ 76 cities at 18+ So it was pretty close up to the 14+ city/nation level, which is where most of Alpha membership was. Alpha had the edge at the 17+ level, t$/TEst gain the edge at the 14+ city level, then t$/TEst gain a more substantial edge if you add the 10-13 city nations. Still even then it's far from 150 to 30 odds. Or even 50-60 vs 15-20.

Alpha had 13 nations with 15+ cities and an average city count of 16.85 while t$/TEst had 24 nations with 15+ cities and an average city count of 15.88. Alpha had 24 nations with 14+ cities and an average city count of 15.54 while t$/TEst had 32 nations with 14+ cities and an average city count of 15.41.

In some ways, due to nukes, it's more impressive if you significantly out-damage your opponent in an even sided war than in a war where you're outnumbered. Although I guess congrats to Alpha for have the foresight to stockpile nukes and a solid warchest.

What does that imaginary scenario have to do with our discussion?

It's not a 3v1 when the three are in multiple wars. I was in 4-5 wars at any given time for most of this war and most of the previous war but that doesn't mean I was fighting in 1v5s.

How do the stats for Syndicate's first round against Alpha compare to TEst's?

FYI I think it was only about 50-60 nations that engaged your 30-35 in the first round. And even within those match-ups, I think Alpha usually had a 1-3 city lead on their opponents. All those lower tier t$ nations didn't do anything until much later when you were knocked down to their level.

I haven't paid very close attention but it seems like NAC fought pretty well too.

Yeah, Rose had a decent blitz. It was the most significant counter from their side and decent part of the reason why Syndicate wasn't an as big player in this war as you would have expected. VE's counter on Syndicate was of some effectiveness against a couple of Syndicate's top nations but was mostly stopped in its tracks by TKR's insta-counter. DEIC's counter on Mensa was rough on their top 5-10 nations, but that's pretty much it. Fark did an ok attempt at countering TKR, but it was too little, too late, to make much of a difference. Sparta was a terrible match for BK and was rapidly swarmed with updeclares.

June 13 to June 24 infra damage stats by alliance

Infra damage stats for BK sphere's side. Damage dealt has been dropping, but damage taken seems to be dropping even faster.

And DEIC.

Just save it to your dossier https://politicsandwar.com/index.php?id=132