ELPINCHAZO

Since no nation or leader exists with that name,i'd say no.

They'll watch you die to save their lives.

I'm sorry,I can't find those on my map of orbis.

BEGONE eLAWYER!!!!!!

Phiney and I signed for you....and wrote a few checks out in your name. Those real dolls can be very expensive and the Emperor only wants the VERY best.

On this day the Atlas Confederacy and Terminus Est have sworn an oath in blood. signed, TAC gov TEst Command.

Shhhhhhh!! Dead people don't post.

We of Terminus Est must reluctantly inform Orbis of the passing of our Emperor,Jodo. Jodo left this wretched sphere but still owns faces and drinks crappy beer in a far better place. We salute him and morn his passing. Just for clarification,the TEst chain of command: Warmaster: El Pinchazo Primarch: Phiney Officer: Toxxikation To truly remember the Emperor,listen to him scream like a little girl. http://youtu.be/n8lYUlV8XRM?list=UU9Z9kY59y32Y4JE5z8qQHUw

There don't exist enough languages for me to reply to this in a sufficiently negative manner.

what does that even mean?

Thats not what you said last night...now I feel dirty

umm,since its a distribution I'd prefer to see the median price if possible.

you obviously haven't been paying attention to how that has been going.

i wager the drama will be in this very thread.

We had someone that was an applicant for a day or so that went unnoticed. He was attacked while and applicant,the result of his losing war ended in our bank being hit for resources. This should NOT ever happen as the player was never accepted into our alliance. This seriously needs to be fixed ASAP or it is going to be a cattle call for a new wave of multi abuse. http://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=19073 our example. there should probably also be options to set alliances to open or closed,etc.

Best comment in a P&W thread yet.

take this example where I only really have 83 aluminum

I believe you have the option to delete your own account anyway...

also,I can still create offers at multiple price ranges i.e.: I have 300 steel create 1 offer for 300 steel @$1500 create 2nd offer for 300 steel @ $1501 this allows someone to spam the market with bogus offers,even if they only are able to really sell the 300 it will create an unfair visibility for that person spamming offers until that 300 is sold.

I'm not sure if it is being exploited but it would be best to fix it either way. One can submit a trade on the market and then submit another trade for the full amount they have in stock. When the numbers are combined they are then posting more that the user has currently. There should be a bit of code here that queries that full amount that the user has of that resource and makes that the final amount. ie you have 20 coal Trade offer A 5 coal for $200 Trade offer B 20 coal for $200 Then: the aggregated market offer becomes 25 for $200 instead of 20 for $200 like it should be.

that makes no sense,if they've been around before then they probably know enough.

median is better than average as outliers will skew things if you want to look at the whole distribution. If you want to use averages it might be better to track things like 'the average for the last x(10 or 100 or 1000) number of units sold.

no.

is this one of the d3 things i suggested?

I'd suggest a timeline and limited mentorship period. Like 1-2 weeks or some crap. Kick the baby bird out of the nest ASAP,just give them a chance to possibly fly.