Jump to content

katashimon13

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    563

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Posts posted by katashimon13

    bounties in escrow instead of denied due to blockade

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by katashimon13
    rawr

    the bougie pplz taught me that word

    this had to have been suggested before but...

     

    basically bounties are p lame because of the blockade rule to stop them from affecting other wars/cheating/watever

    u can only really pull it off reliably if you get some people to fill slots for u @ dtc

    i had a 1 mil bounty on me through so so many wars if not multiple years

    there is no real incentive to cause chaos as intended if the risk one takes.... even upon completion cannot be rewarded just because someone else blockaded

     

    change it to not reward the money until like no wars are happening on that nation for x time

    then maybe it will be worth throwing money on nations because pirates or seedy "profit" driven individuals can actually see profit at the end of it if they decide to ignore the FA ramifications ;3

     

    rawr

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 2

    Quality of Life Improvements

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    On 7/22/2022 at 3:19 PM, TheGoldenGoose said:

    I think there should be an option on the alliance page to view alliance score history breakdown, like you see member breakdown. I wanna see what percentage is infra, or mil, or cities, or whatever. Its just a fun metric to see, and can help see the actual makeup of any alliance

    especially since if we could see it for the history of the alliance you would be able to see how they are growing in a specific area

    if you can already do this then mb, and also please show me how cause ive been trying to find it for a while lmao

    have you asked ur alliance? sometimes pplz have historical data

    i do not think there is a similar breakdown to the nation page on the alliance scale no

    rawr

    Beige, the Final Season.

    in Game Discussion

    Posted · Edited by katashimon13
    rawr

    18 hours ago, Prefontaine said:

    hopefully increase participation.

    just make it a bil plus the cosmetics

    frankly is a negligible amount to add to the game esp after  how much was added to the game via multiple instances rampant cheating and will actually incentivize people to come help outside the the regular tryhards

    17 hours ago, Zevari said:

    So we changed from allowing some degree of strategy to making it whoever is richer/has more nations wins?

    6lwrp2xhplg41.jpg

    15 hours ago, Prefontaine said:

    I'm open to discussing what should and shouldn't change in regards to that.

    make piracy great again 🏴‍☠️

    14 hours ago, Marika said:

    "Wars will be determined by economics" - I personally feel that running your econ successfully should play a part in your ability to conduct war.

    as ive said plenty of times b4 war is economics with explosions xP
    and as i said plenty of times before mobilizing pplz economically should be effort embargo bad
    can confirm havent ran out of stockpiles since knightfall


    p.s.
    FACTORIOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    11 hours ago, Avatar Patrick said:

    I can recall plenty of times in the last global I fought where beige cycle was ruined because

    @Avatar Patrick
    thanks for ruining cycles on me in the past ;3

    9 hours ago, Callisto said:

    I feel as though we're trying to fix a political problem with game mechanics, but ultimately, you can't fix this problem.

    agreed humans are terrible and we should all stop perpetuating progress in our personalized purgatories of posturing politics and performative plutonium

    p.s. hai callisto

    rawr

    Implement Pending Changes Before End of War?

    in Game Discussion

    Posted

    23 hours ago, Village said:

    Nations can opt out of any embargo on their alliance's embargo page, it's a simple button click.

    i am aware of how it works and its "simplicity"

    that is the last option or at least it was...

    we have skipped everything in between to address embargoes

    just because its possible/easier to implement? and was misrepresented in the QoL compilation thread (by a supporter) does not mean it actually had any level of unanimous support in any of the threads where it has been brought up

    i am definitely for and have been for a better system (tracking management etc etc) but giving all power away to the few AND have it be opt out is way too far

    these games are fueled by and live on interpersonal interaction this is just leaders avoiding dealing with members it is not an ease of access issue ....else the other things would have been implemented/pushed for prior

    as ive stated before the option should not be there at all and there -should- be effort involved in rallying troops whether it be militarily economically or culturally

    rawr

     

    Implement Pending Changes Before End of War?

    in Game Discussion

    Posted · Edited by katashimon13
    rawr

    semi regular reminder that alliance controlled embargoes bad @Alex... still have no idea why you allowed this through...i guess everyone else giving up and certain other people whispering in your ear over the years broke it down

    On 7/14/2022 at 5:00 AM, Prefontaine said:

    we're ... largely armatures

    you ... arent wrong

    https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/27593-let-alliances-embargo/&do=findComment&comment=460713unknown.png
    rah rah baseball

    rawr

    • Haha 2

    [Serious] Do you guys know how this game works?

    in Moderation Support

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Alex said:

    If this wasn't war slot filling, you could have alliance A at war with alliance B, and let's say alliance C is allied to alliance B. Alliance C dumps their treaty with Alliance B and declares war on Alliance B en masse and fills all their slots, but does no attacks. That would ruin the war for Alliance A basically.

    i know this is a reach... but i feel like you would be able to tell the difference even on this "small" of a scale ;3

    rawr

    A call to arms (against Alex)

    in Orbis Central

    Posted

    48 minutes ago, Alex said:

    I wasn't online over the weekend, and going through a very large backlog of DMs and tickets on Discord now.

    No - and the rules explicitly state this.

    do.... the mods/other admin not help with that giant backlog at all? ........
    i understand wanting to handle things your way but like... shirley some of it can be filtered with a bias toward heavy caution? like tiered moderation????

    so lets say... someone knowingly filled spy slots multiple times.... lets say over the course of 2 weeks? and they were reported multiple times over the course of these 2 weeks.... how many warnings would they have on their nation... would they still be allowed to play?

    the rules state that its an offense to assist the defending nation... if one is declaring for beige... it would be assisting the aggressor not the defender (at least with how wars actually go and there is no real even amount of slots in a set range)

    rawr

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept