Domestic Policies are too political

[Andrezj Kolarov]

Removing the economic bonuses from government types was great for RP in the game, but the problem now is that the new Domestic Policies are political in themselves.

 

Technological Development

Urbanization

 

Those 2 are both fine, not political.

 

Open Markets

Imperialism

Manifest Destiny

 

Politically loaded as a machine-gun, no good communist state like me wants to ever have to change to disgusting policies like those. Here's some renaming suggestions:

 

Open Markets -> Commerce

Imperialism -> Military Spending

Manifest Destiny -> Expansion

 

Done.

Edited March 6, 2016 by Andrezj Kolarov

[Ikhan]

Agreed, this is a much needed change.

[----]

Good call. Unfortunately, one can expect this type of political unconsciousness from a mostly American administration.

[Dimitri Valko]

Yeah, having Open Markets in my Socialist State is bloody infuriating.

[Anony von Pomern]

Why not a dynamic name based on government form?

 

For instance, in a socialist state:

 

Open Markets -> Planned Economy

Imperialism -> Export Revolution

 

Whereas in a Federal Republic:

 

Imperialism -> Defense Budget

Technological Development -> R&D Investment

 

So on, so forth. Keeps the relative flavor of the originals, but also solves the issue mentioned here.

[Hereno]

Good call. Unfortunately, one can expect this type of political unconsciousness from a mostly American administration.

shots fired

 

Why not a dynamic name based on government form?

 

For instance, in a socialist state:

 

Open Markets -> Planned Economy

Imperialism -> Export Revolution

 

Whereas in a Federal Republic:

 

Imperialism -> Defense Budget

Technological Development -> R&D Investment

 

So on, so forth. Keeps the relative flavor of the originals, but also solves the issue mentioned here.

i like this but i think it might be making it too complicated for what it is

 

for example, in my communist democracy, a "planned economy" isn't really what i'm going for, but that's what i'd be getting

 

plus, tito's market socialism, etc.

 

with all the different government types it seems easier to just do what the OP says

[Abu Haddad]

shots fired

 

 

i like this but i think it might be making it too complicated for what it is

 

for example, in my communist democracy, a "planned economy" isn't really what i'm going for, but that's what i'd be getting

 

plus, tito's market socialism, etc.

 

with all the different government types it seems easier to just do what the OP says

how about centralised economy