Jump to content

James Ironwood

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by James Ironwood

  1. Ooo, you've got a good ratio! My compliments. โš”๏ธ
  2. Lmfao, that's exactly what I DID. And that's exactly what my milcom told me to do, regardless of how many hundreds of blocmates I have and which of those did the same. Then how come my ratio is better than yours? No offense, buddy, but I wouldn't have you train me in the art of war if you paid me.
  3. That doesn't change the simple fact that Duck Hunt was a one-sided conflict, and it lasted twice as long as this one. So sorry this one had to end, otherwise we might have had to resort to those nuking, sunken ship displays you blissfully refer to as "guerilla tactics". Perhaps the situation would have changed, but we'll never know now. Also, excuses are actually your specialty, as displayed by your strange interpretation of Duck Hunt. A great, overwhelming loss to superior numbers and you still claim all of the merit because of "guerilla tactics". That's like saying Carthago did well as an alliance in NPO's last time. Granted, my only experience with Carthago in NPO was beiging multiple members of theirs in double buy DC attacks while I was dogpiled myself! ๐Ÿ˜ Why don't you stop being such an irritant to this otherwise finally peaceful and resolved discussion, plus lose less than half of your wars, and then we can talk about "gitting gud". xD
  4. Okay, so out of the fart clouds, not the shadows. Still a pretty unexpected place to come from to talk to me, hahaha. Anyway, my bad, I just still don't appreciate the sudden shift in tone from talking about farts to telling me off for not being in Milcom; all that means is I wasn't responsible for any mediocre performance, especially regarding other alliances' activity. ๐Ÿคจ
  5. I guess it shouldn't surprise me that a c29, 90 rep nation leader has come from the shadows, with a mythical down declare of their own, to denounce my mere interest in the forums. Down declares during the war be damned; I never complained about those once, and I'm not going to complain about this one in the forums either. ๐Ÿคฃ I don't know who from ROASIS soiled your attitude enough for flatulence to be your desired rename of it, but all I can say is I thank you for the attention and credit you give to this non-milcom member that had nothing to do with whatever saw our upper tiers fail to capitalize on their numbers in time. Your condescending insults in response to jokes and a little inquiry are very appreciated, my friend. ('_')7
  6. War dodging is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be immoral.
  7. A reminder to the honorable gentleman who decided to reply that this is my first forum post and all I'm trying to do here is gather information and gauge the general mood of participants. You seemed a bit salty at the peace terms, I noticed that. With regards to Duck Hunt (not "the Last Ride" lol), I was more so talking about the fact that at times I could not, for the life of me, find a target that wasn't getting beiged or dogpiled on your side - at least in my tier. So that was a boring war for me. I actually enjoyed this one more because you guys got a good pearl harbor blitz in while we were napping, which made things more interesting and involved. We just have to focus on being more awake next time as Alexandra and Ronny pointed out. Has nothing to do with "git gud at wars", they aren't hard to figure out seeing as I personally still beiged people on your side. ๐Ÿ˜ **That's it really, just saying: that war was a lot more one sided strictly in terms of win rates on our end; getting me to care about a few more burned pixels in this war is another matter entirely. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
  8. Talk it over with your sphere, that would be awesome!
  9. No, not for most of you, but there are a few I did want to point out as being unhappy with the White Peace. I really can't say why, but I assume it's because they wanted more war glory. The war was very well conducted on your end, and I congratulate you guys on what you were able to accomplish. It was good to have a competent foe! Pffft, right
  10. That's why it's good that Hollywood is listed as having a "Military victory" on the wiki. It just makes the most sense to me because, overall, our alliance wasn't rocked as hard and our overall alliance's score still hasn't dropped below TKR's. The Syndicate, however....
  11. Thanks for your honest input, my guy, you're a service to this discussion.
  12. Gotta watch out for us James's! We'll always cause a dispute and, unlike our detractors, waste very little time in doing so!
  13. There is still bad blood with some people, I think. TKR/Hollywood seems to have scored a very minor victory compared to the absolute revenge that they wanted, and their lower tiers didn't even get to experience that for the most part. I guess spies and nations below c20 don't exist. Neither does good diplomacy, either. lol Isjaki (c26) up there seems to be pissed that the war didn't continue, but neither side really wanted it to continue, overall. I'm so sorry Hollywood didn't trash Roasis quite as well as Quack was trashed in Duckhunt (good memories, boring war) - maybe next time. So yeah... quite a few Hollywood jimmies were apparently rustled at the mere thought that their c20+ tier's success didn't completely get mirrored to the rest of their lower tiers. Just wanted to point that out and say gg, see you in the next GW!
  14. XD Epi is right, that moment when a RWBY themed nation attacked ATLAS itself was also one of the most wholesome moments for me in this WR-destroying, attritional crapfest! Glad I won that particular battle, at least. Makes me want to join camelot after the rebuild but don't tell my superiors! ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.