Jump to content

MonkeyDLegend

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    412

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by MonkeyDLegend

    Dude Seriously

    in Ban Appeals

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    Dude, donations are non-refundable, instead of crying for lost money you should make a case on why it was unfair or something. 

    No one forced you to donate to the game, you made up ur own mind about it so deal with it properly.

    • Upvote 1

    [DoE] weeaboos make their appearance

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    25 minutes ago, Avakael said:

    @Nokia Rokia how did you like my post 4 times

    Wtf Alex even the forum karma system has a duplication bug in it, fix your damn game

     -1 others reacted to this 


    Tried to fix it but i broke it even more XD 


    @Alex Forums is starting to break, pplz can like a post more then once, the daily limit to likes/dislikes isn't working either(you can like as many post as you want)


    v8SjYWF.png

    • Like 1

    Remove Alliance Bank Looting & Cap Alliance Bank Amounts

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    25 minutes ago, Alex said:

    That nation has 0 score. Regardless of whether or not they could transfer if they were blockaded, no one can declare war on them anyway. So they could never be blockaded in the first place.

    i see ur point but that's incorrect.
    if a newcomer applies to an alliance and has one city, he can sell all improvements and infra, get to the same score as that nation you posted, declares, buys a few cities, then that nation can easily loot that bank. 

    I'd be the first one to advise that nation and help him coordinate that bank heist.

    Remove Alliance Bank Looting & Cap Alliance Bank Amounts

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    6 minutes ago, Alex said:

    That nation has 0 score. Regardless of whether or not they could transfer if they were blockaded, no one can declare war on them anyway. So they could never be blockaded in the first place.

    that is a problem yes, but so is the score you get from infra to get troops, if blockaded nations can't send fund then someone could actually steal their bank and they wouldn't have 0 score.

    Personally i'd send a newcomer on them and help the newcomer understand the game while he pulls of the heist. We have many new players each day.

    ofc when they are blockaded they can't just promote other pplz to have bank access either.

    Remove Alliance Bank Looting & Cap Alliance Bank Amounts

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Alex said:

    To all the people downvoting my original post:

    What about this? https://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=6045

    Do you think this is fine? This is de-facto invulnerable bank looting anyway. Very rarely do banks actually get looted in the status-quo. Eliminating bank looting isn't going to change much in terms of gameplay, it's just going to get rid of a lot of the confusing offshore 1-man alliances.

    Having the cap on alliance banks will ensure that you can actually loot more because nations will have to store a lot more money/rss.

    i'll point to my former statement: 

     

    • Downvote 1

    New Official Portrait

    in National Affairs

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Jordan said:

    Premier Jordan is happy to announce, that alongside long time International Ally (MonkeyDLegend) he is starting a new fund to supply underprivileged children from around Orbis, with fresh air. This program is set to begin in 300 days, under a third term.

    I will support this cause with 1 billion dollars, those children have to eat!

    • Haha 1

    Other Satellites (Space program)

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Prefontaine said:

    Problem with that is at a certain point they're spending over a billion to be able to get that new project slot. With these 3 you're looking at 19 project slots to have them all. That's 95,000 infra. That's over 3100 infra in each city in a 30 city nations. And where are you going to cap it? 10? 5? 15?

    Great point.  But we're talking a one time cost and a lifetime of bonus from the projects, which i feel is unfair for new players. 
    Alltho i find it good that it costs alot to get all of them, but i also feel the bonus outweighs the cost long term. 

    As for the cap, i don't know tbqh. 10 seems too low, 15 is too much.
    10 would be good for the game, it would force players play more strategically and be more dependent on other members in their respective alliance. But this would give a huge advantage to big alliances and a dissadvantage to the small ones.


    Could also just leave it be as it is and see how it affects the game for a period of time.

    Other Satellites (Space program)

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    On 9/16/2019 at 6:49 AM, Prefontaine said:

    -snip-

    The idea is great but we need to cap the projects per nation, atm the big nation with the infra can just get them all and keep their top spot, and gain evcery bonus possible from all the projects.

    Getting all the projects would give a huge advantage for the older players while the newer ones can't get all and if they want all it will takke alot of time. 

    Editing amounts and prices

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    On 9/16/2019 at 7:10 AM, Mandystalin said:

    Seems like it would drive down prices. Nobody would want to lose their 5% so everyone would undercut their oppo. I mean this happens now to a degree, hence the desire behind the original suggestion, but effectively fining players for being undercut can only increase it

    Could just increase the % of the cost each time you edit/ undercut someone and cap it at 5%. 
     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept