Daniel Storm
-
Posts
322 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Daniel Storm
-
-
3 minutes ago, Cypher said:
I don’t think you’ve realised I was the head FA person for HS during those times, and 99% of the logs between tS and NPO, I would have seen. That’s not even including all the messages between ourselves (Revan and myself) and NPO.
So you're just the man I'm looking for! ? I've been waiting to see the proof of collaboration from BK-TCW & NPO-T$ for months, not these weakass statements of individual intent. Bring out the goods my man, was there a solidified agreement? a joint statement of intent? a planning channel? maybe even a preliminary target sheet? Show me what you've got! There has to be something for everyone to be so damn certain of this collaborative plan.
-
Just now, Rosey Song said:
Uhhhhhhh, proof of what accusation? You realize the logs are literally on the wiki, yeah?
The logs where Sphinx says they're going to hit Chaos, and that they are "in talks with T$-NPO where they will hit KETOG"? Those logs? The ones that only show the BK-TCW position and contain no evidence that NPO-T$ actually colluded with BK-TCW, and developed a plan for war? That's all you've got?
Oh jeepers I'm sorry, with all the certainty being thrown around that there was a concrete joint plan by BK-TCW&NPO-T$ I assumed there must be incontrovertible evidence of this plan somewhere, surely you all wouldn't act like you were absolutely certain of this joint plan when your only evidence is a statement from one party that they intended to approach the other. Now that T$ is on your side it shouldn't be that hard to dig up such a plan so what's the delay?
-
8 minutes ago, Cypher said:
Anyone else find it ironic that BK + NPO were planning a war, got pre empted because of those plans and are now demanding reps?
That’s a dangerous precedence you’re setting, @Shadowthrone
Great point! I'm sure your representatives in the negotiation will finally provide their proof of that accusation in order to secure more favorable terms! Right?
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, doge said:
I think the math on the soldiers is wrong. I checked the math on the tanks after my comment though and that had the right number.
You're right, it's calculating off of 45,000 soldiers per city instead of 15,000. 1 sec.
Fixed
-
43 minutes ago, doge said:
What city count is this at?
It's exactly 1 city like Alex said.
5 Barracks
5 Factories
5 Hangars
3 Drydocks
-
1
-
-
Prefontaine's post about reducing the cost of tanks and increasing the cost of planes got me thinking about how damned cheap war is, and what a fractional cost most non-tank units are. So I would like to present an alternate proposal that we avoid making war any cheaper than it already is, and instead increase the costs of other units to be more in line with that of tanks.
Right now if you were to fully militarize, over 57% of your costs would be spent purely on tanks. Followed by 27% on ships, 15% on planes, and 1% on soldiers. With that in mind I propose that unit costs be re-balanced to the following numbers or something similar.
This is a pretty conservative proposal, and I'm not married to any of the numbers, but I think it offers a decent visualization of my idea.
As you can see these changes would greatly increase the cost of the current "cheap" Aircraft and Soldier units, while keeping Ships roughly on par with where they are now, and making tanks much cheaper in a relative sense, without actually reducing their cost. Given how dirt-cheap war is, and that in the current economic meta any competent alliance can keep fighting indefinitely, I think it would be a mistake to reduce the cost of any military unit, instead costs of cheap units should be increased to make the expensive unit (tanks) a more attractive option.
-
6
-
1
-
-
I'm against the general principle of changing the war system during a war, but none of these are substantive enough to really affect anything.
-
9 minutes ago, Etatsorp said:
Two things are apparent in this war:
1) Coalition B cannot defeat coalition A in war through military force alone (otherwise the war would be over),
2) Coalition B cannot keep their coalition together over time.
Therefore it stands to reason that it is far more likely Coalition B will implode before they defeat coalition A as things currently stand. There is no way, after all this war so far, that I would delete to miss that moment!!
Then why are you guys trying to surrender? If you read the OP you'll see its about Partisan being given the runaround while trying to surrender.
-
1
-
-
Welp, Press F for Christmas peace.
Valentines peace maybe?
-
1
-
2
-
-
Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=181950
Ruler Name: Freshly bathed Marie
Nature of Violation: The second image is some Rule34 shit. I would screenshot it, but then I'd be posting an inappropriate image.
-
6
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The micro bloc stole Pantheon's bank and then started raiding them, and now you're crying foul because their MDPs are defending them. That's the exact purpose of an MDP not bullying, what did you expect them to do? Bend over?
imo both sides are irrelevant micros, but if TCM can't handle the heat then it should get out of the kitchen.
-
2
-
7
-
1
-
This sounds like a fun turn. And the loan thing is clever if you can convince people to default.
However, I have to echo other commenters and wonder why you aren't hitting Demacia if this is such a big deal to you. It's almost like your moral imperative is being overwritten by fear of TCW and Rose.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Can't say I understand the point in faking and releasing logs that paint you in a negative light. Generally the only advantage to that is to find leakers, but by leaking it yourself directly to Shifty that benefit is kinda eliminated.
Good for y'all I guess?
-
2
-
19
-
If you're gonna talk shit, you should be able to get hit.
-
2
-
3
-
-
Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=184940
Name(s) in question: You really gotta ask? How hard are word filters anyway.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
You jacked TKR around for months, and you're doing the same thing here. That's not actually irony, that's just NPO being consistently pathetic.
Damn that's quite the alternative fact.
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, Bartholomew Roberts said:
t has seemed like the people in NPOsphere and BKsphere have some sort of trauma related to Knightfall peace talks. I'm not sure what happened with those as I was inactive at the time but it seems like most of the decisions on how to handle peace talks have been based off a desire for more structure.
afaik TKR jacked us around for months. Which makes all the whining from TKR members upset that this peace process hasn't been instant rather ironic.
-
-
15 hours ago, Sval said:
This is a most generous offer. Your "specialists" are certainly helping us handle the bloat.I can't seem to find your alliance on the treaty web anymore. Could you please point it out to me? Thanks ?
-
1
-
-
I recognize your name from somewhere, you play NS?
-
1
-
-
49 minutes ago, The Point Guard said:
Hey man, do some homework before you talk out your ass, Mr. Magical Keno King. Less land buying, more history checking. We did join CoA this war. Then tS left us high and dry on the battlefield for some bullshit unilateral deal they made. So why would we attack our friends to bail out more tS douchebaggery and defacto help out people who hate us?
No joke, the same alliance tS went in for is an alliance harboring a Alpha-rogue. Sheeeeet man. That was a no brainer.
What about GOB, weren't you just dying to restore their whale tier control? Must have been hard to stay out with how good friends you guys are.
-
21 minutes ago, Alex said:
It should be the same for trading, wars, and other interactions.
Well as the OP shows I've fought DtC before.
I can also do this
It isn't the same for all interactions, which is what I've been saying since the start in case that wasn't clear. The restriction is solely on Espionage.
-
52 minutes ago, Alex said:
Ah, my apologies, I was looking at the wrong information.
It seems that you have accessed the game from the same network that this nation has accessed the game from before, which is why you're flagged this way automatically.
Huh, probably my university's network. @dtc justice sup neighbor.
Why does it only affect espionage and no other restricted actions though?
-
42 minutes ago, Nizam Adrienne said:
That is around what our score was before Knightfall, pretty sure, and yeah, it was just before we got hit. I think without militarization, it was in the low 400ks. Maybe high 300ks.
Around 380k from what I can see yeah.
An Announcement from Coalition A Regarding Peace Talks
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
I'm just a regular guy looking for some juice, sorry to disappoint you by not giving a detailed response about a peace process I have no involvement in and know nothing about ?