[Some thoughts for next year]

2 hours ago, Adrienne said:

I may have already added the former to my ongoing list 😶 What do you mean by preferential/ranked?

Lets say you've got 5 nominees.

In normal voting like we did, we have one choice per.

In ranked/preferential, we've got multiple votes that are weighted differently. So I'd put my number one choice as 1, it'd have the most weight, 2nd as 2nd, slightly less weight, and so forth.

 

 

Gotta agree with Kata on this one - ranked voting is >>>>

[Full logs of the accused Firwof]

3 hours ago, Empiur said:

Regarding the rules channel, it came to our attention that people have likely not noticed that we have had rules in our #intro channel, so in order for visibility, we copied them into their own channel.

Oh, I wasn't commenting on y'all as a whole in the slightest. I just think it's interesting that Corpsman has been defending the content of the logs rather than just saying "Gov has handled it and made the rules more clear".

[Full logs of the accused Firwof]

In this thread: Weebunism member "Corpsman" goes out of the way to defend Nazi-sympathizing by way of "BUT COMMIES AND ALSO ITS HAHA FUNNY" when they could just point out that Weebunism has wiped the channel and made a rules channel (from secondhand knowledge) that I'd assume clarifies that it isn't supported.

 

Good show of hand there, Corpsman.

[On the conduct of persons henceforth.]

2 hours ago, Mayor said:

What a train wreck of a thread lol

 

Still tho gave me a few minutes of good reading, anything is better than another post about mysterious HM leader. Please give us a new war so Phoenyx can talk about that. This thread is valid CB for everyone involved. Alex says disputes should be resolved through in-game so I expect some wars.  

I mean, what did you expect? It's one of the shadiest IC groups in the game calling the other shadiest group in the game out. This thread was never going to do well. I've enjoyed the popcorn though.

[On the conduct of persons henceforth.]

1 hour ago, Nick McScott said:

It's pretty common procedure, if a member sends information from a non public channel it's called leaking, every single member is made aware of those rules when signing up for the alliance and if those rules are broken there are consequences. Wingawoo agreed to these terms, I was there when the interview was conducted. The argument you make makes literally no sense, shittalking is in this game's nature whether done in public or private, evidently you knew our stance on you prior to seeing what you saw, our general member chats are places where any member can speak to other members about anything(Except for very few things). The fact that there's a forum thread about this highlights the very reason we have these rules. Our members aren't here to make you feel good, they aren't here to be nice to you, they're here to play and are entitled to their own opinions about people in game. What members aren't allowed to do is leak screenshots from non public channels, that rule has 0 exceptions and isn't hard to follow.

@Vero please read

[DoE - A New Whaleosus Emerges]

*sees patrick as leader*

*nods in silent acceptance*

 

[Psst, more t$ leaks]

1 minute ago, Theodosius said:

I've no idea what is going on, but someone should fire Vero all the same.

 

[Psst, more t$ leaks]

bruh

[A Snake's Tale: Surrender, Booze, and Peace]

10 hours ago, Keegoz said:

I don't really see how this shows anything?

Are you using the "play dumb" FA tactic now? That's beneath you.

 

You know it shows plenty.

1. Precedent. Rose and Swamp worked together (or rather certain aspects were "controlled" by them). You tied TI knowing this. 

2. Gives more legitimacy to our suspicions that this backroom rub and tug has been going on for much longer than our militarization. 

3. Makes your "Quack man bad Quack man smart and big and threat argument look like a joke. Please. Rose, one of the oldest and most well established alliances had their hands all over the strings of certain parties in Swamp and you.. somehow saw that as less of a threat than big bad Sphinx and his outstanding military reputation? That leads me to point

4. All this adds up quite nicely, if I'm honest. With your history with Rose in mind, you ignoring their attempts to control another sphere makes sense. Attacking tCW because you knew Sphinx would fold and follow whatever you/whoever was put in charge of him said, smart play. At that point you're already in control of/friendly with/bedding more than half the game. Next, you sow distrust (PARTISAN MAN EVIL SCHEMER comes to mind) while refusing to actually substantiate it with any evidence, and make Quack the big bad mutual enemy.

 

I knew you had an affinity for stealthy backrubs in the darkness of night, but you've impressed me this time. Demonize us for "ruining minispheres" all you like, but I'd take a look at your actions first. Unless you want to keep playing dumb, of course.

[A Snake's Tale: Surrender, Booze, and Peace]

43 minutes ago, Keegoz said:

I am yet to see t$ claim any responsibility for what happened here. The mere fact that your first thing to do was to jump to <insert Quack talking points> pretty much proves that. The shocking part here is that our effort to get people to rally against you was not hard. We didn't need any 'secret treaties' to do it. If you don't believe that's a sign that perhaps you are doing something wrong, than keep your current course. 

Hi Keeg! Long time no speak!

 

I have some questions if you don't mind. 

 

Which part am I supposed to take responsibility for? You knowing Rose had their hands all over Swamp when you tied them back in May? You conveniently avoiding and ignoring that fact despite admitting you knew about it? Maybe you calling us a hegemony even though you've been very aware of and even part of these backroom ties since at least then?

 

You can sit here and spew all the shit you want about "QUACK MAN TOO BIG" and "QUACK MAN HEGEMON" and try to spin it as it being our fault all you want, my dear. 

 

Don't pretend you haven't been giving eachother sensual backrubs for months my friend. We can go round and round all day long, but I think I'll let you speak for yourself.

 

What's that saying about bricks in glass houses?

[An end to the war. A $yndicate broadcast]

3 hours ago, zigbigadorlou said:

You have 2 weeks..

I feel threatened!

[A Snake's Tale: Surrender, Booze, and Peace]

2 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

Strategic victory!

WE WON THIS, BY A LOT!

[An end to the war. A $yndicate broadcast]

[2020 Final Category Selection]

Hello ms adrienne i have voted

You are welcome for my incredibly valuable and rare time and input

[2020 PnW Academy Awards]

Worst Recruiting - t$

 

Best Growth - t$

[Unacceptable]

5 minutes ago, Prefonteen said:

Looks like a typo to me. Happppens to me all the time. 

Jokes aside:
 

 

 

Should moderation to decide that this attempt at moderation weaponization warrants action, I eagerly await retroactive action against the above.

Hi! As I'm in one of these screenshots I'm considering myself part of this report and would also like to use my "insider knowledge" as one of KT's ex-high gov.

 

The "KKKT" meme has been around for a while, as evidenced in the screenshots above. Never once has any member of KT taken any offense to it, and in fact we made (as shown by my comment there, as at the time I was in KT still) many many jokes about it and Kosmo, where it originated from. 

 

Yes - KT is under new leadership and *perhaps* that changes the view of it. And if that's the case - I agree with Prefonteen. If action is taken on this report it should be retroactive. That said, judging by KT's public discord (I know, I know "discord evidence is not permittable" or whatever, but) and the memes that members and government still post there, I highly doubt that being referred to as "KKKT" again offended them in any ways and this is, in fact, just an excuse to have moderation used against an enemy for a "AHA GOTCHA" moment. I remember the days where reports like this from a member of KT would get them nothing but ridicule and jokes towards them from other members. 

 

You're better than that, Denison. If you have any issues with it my DMs as well as Partisan's are wide open and you are well aware of that. o7

[An appeal to Hime-Sama]

On 11/28/2020 at 12:28 PM, epsteindidntkillhimself said:

who is hime-sama? i only know skitz.

Who's Skitz? You mean Cianuro? Or Roflwaffle?  Or Parachotic? Or Richtofen? Or Dottore Della Pestilenza? Or Skittles? Or Venom? Or Neurotoxin? Or Aether? Or Aethereal? 

 

(cian babe you have a problem)

[Where am I? Partisan musings]

can i get a translator

[Propaganda thread]

1 hour ago, Redarmy said:

vroom vroom vrooooom

[A (Not So) Brief Note on the Narrative]

On 11/15/2020 at 8:01 AM, Phoenyx said:

I was given a choice- either stop posting about the war here or I had to go.

yes friend that is the definition of a gag order, congrats!

[A (Not So) Brief Note on the Narrative]

Hegemony Coalition: t$ man has gag order!!!!!!!

Also Hegemony Coalition: Mostly silence, other than @Phoenyx who has been kicked from multiple AAs for posting on the OWF.

 

t$: Has Eumir and Malleator

 

 

The math isn't adding up here mate

[A (Not So) Brief Note on the Narrative]

49 minutes ago, Grave said:

 

I've already said that I do not speak for Swamp or TI. Just a concerned citizen of the game that understands this is just an attempt to create a pity party for your own echo-chamber

All your mention shows is that you have no counter to my argument 

:thinking:

[4 Long Winters]

[Propaganda thread]

15 minutes ago, AwesomeNova said:

The Syndicate and TKR have no military to maintain their net damage dealt. Once the military is gone, the infra is next.

Big if true

[t$ milcom leaks]

Unrelated to the parent post, but I'm looking for a new IA manager for The Enterprise, if anyone's interested.