RedArmy BushMan

Personal favorite of mine. Delta Force had an opening for a new team member. After all the background checks, interviews, and testing were done, there were three finalists: an Air Force Pararescue, an Army Ranger, and a Marine Force Recon. For the final test, the Delta Force examiner took the Airman to a large metal door and handed him a gun. "We must know that you will follow orders, no matter what the circumstances. Inside this room, you will find a man tied to a chair. Kill him!!!" The Airman said, "You can't be serious. I could never shoot a helpless unarmed man." The examiner said, "Then you're not the right man for this job. Return to your unit." The Ranger was given the same instructions. He took the gun and went into the room. All was quiet for about five minutes. Then the Ranger came out with tears in his eyes. "I tried, but I can't kill a helpless stranger tied to a chair." The examiner said, "You don't have what it takes. Return to your platoon." Finally, it was the Marine's turn. He was given the same instructions, to kill the man tied to the chair. He took the gun and went into the room. Shots were heard, one shot after another. They heard screaming, crashing, banging on the walls. After a few minutes, all was quiet. The door opened slowly and there stood the Marine. He wiped the sweat from his brow. "This damn gun is loaded with blanks," he said. "I had to untie him, and then beat him to death with the chair."

Not always but sometimes. All units are in weight Unsweetened chocolate: 1lb Butter: 1lb 8oz ------------------------------- Eggs: 1lb 8oz (about dozen US "large" eggs) sugar: 3lb salt: 0.25oz vanilla: 1oz ------------------------------- Bread Flour: 1lb ------------------------------- Chopped walnuts or pecans: 1lb Start by having all ingrediants (including eggs) at room tempeture. Using a double boiler melt the chocolate and butter together (Warning doesn't taste as good as it sounds) Mix the ingredients in the second bracket together until just blended, but do not whip eggs. (whiping the eggs may be more kinky but will make brownies less fudgy) Blend in chocolate mixture Sift and fold in flour Fold in nuts Bake at 325 degrees F for 45 to 60 minutes in four 9x13in pans recipe provided by "The Professional Baker 4th Edition" The person below me does not have a cooking scale.

Honestly I agree. Personally I'd never go hunting unless I needed to but some people do it. And thus deterring the would be thieves is defense without killing. Again you're wrong. There is no "simulated killing" a sport shooter spends the majority of their time shooting at paper circles and metal circles with the objective of hitting them as quickly as possible or as accurate as possible. Again the only range shooting (even sport) intended to simulate killing is police and military training courses. When one hunts for food they are killing for food, a nessesary component to life. Hell when my youngest uncle (who just turned 40 recently) was in college, to offset the cost of food he went hunting. He cleaned and froze the meat and says it was a huge factor in keeping him in college

Wrong as wrong can be. I love cheese. The person below me would make a recipe that makes 9lbs of brownies if I posted it.

Wow you really suck at this.The only one of those that is actually about primarily is hunting, and people do that for two major reasons, sport and food. No one in sports shooting is "practicing to kill" they are showing off their talent at a sport they enjoy. Private, home and comerical security are about protection not killing killing is an unfortunate outcome because there is currently not a method that is as effective. Farmland security is more about protecting the crops and animals from varmits and wild animals without the use of poisons that would harm/affect the crops/animals. movies would still pretend to kill even without them at least they have authinticity, and recreational shooting is something to do, damn near 99% of people who go to a range to practice killing are cops and military. sure some people have the thought that they could but people have those thoughts regardless of the situation.

Granted you must first register on Worlds at War I wish I could get accepted into the SAFB program already.

Well that's a gross exageration. We the people do not need those kinds of weapons because if the need to defend ourselves from the government arose the government and military wouldn't be able to fight at full strength. They couldn't use drones, airstrikes, or missiles because of the risk of hitting noncombatants. It would be similar is not harder for them here than what's going on in the middle east.. The IRA was able to fight off and be a huge thorne in the British governments ass and they were mostly using stuff that is available to US citizens, improvised or not. And guns aren't just for the sole purpose of human killing. Hunting, sports shooting, private security, comercial security, protection of farm land, home security, historical collecting, movie props (yes real guns converted to only fire blanks are used in movies), military collecting, and recreational shoot are all things that guns are for. Also gun prices can range from $50-$50,000 depending on what you are looking for. My Mosin Nagant was only $150 before shipping and FFL fees, if I had gotten it in a gun shop in a little rough condition I could have gotten it or $130.

Granted but you are #2 I wish I had an orange mini lop

Nope. Bush. The person below me likes bullpup better than standard.

Granted, but in a momentary lapse of intelligence the wish granter though KSP was a sequel to Katawa Shoujo. Cripple Girls for everyone! I wish I was good at Kerbal Space Program.

Granted, it was a very complex suicide and no one will ever believe you. I wish more people than raiders noticed I went inactive for 2 weeks.

That isn't true at all. If you ever go to a mental facility, even for depression, it makes it much much harder get any kind of firearm legally. Most of the time preexsisting mental conditions come up (at least in MD when I bought my nugget). Plus access to the guns isn't the problem. In Norway (where Anders Brevik lived, killed, and injured many more people than US killers) gun ownership is prohibited unless you can give the government reason to own the firearm, and they must have a clean police record.

In you're opinion which is a better pathfinder/3.5 character (try to ignore level differences) http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=955961 http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=931855 (I know, very creative name)

Have you accepted The Life Giving Bush and you're savior and protector, and the Divine Bush as his prophet?

Needs cookie dispenser. But still good. And good to see bestland made it from space to PaW. 8/10

Woah woah woah let's just slow down and think this through. I know normal nonleathal tear gas is perfectly suited for home defense and riots, but what if the criminals get superior gasses. I don't want my family exposed to sarin just because I didn't have any zyklon B.

Is good gun, kinda expensive to feed if you aren't going bulk surplus but it's a great gun. Mine is named Natasha.

I personally have an M91/30 that I baby. In just over a month (when I turn 21) i'm hoping to get a 1911. I haven't decided if I want an A1 or a Cimarron 1911. My uncle has my grandfather's .38super 1911 which is really nice but expensive so I'll stick to .45 Once I get a more steady job I'm going to look into getting an AR, or SKS. 5.56/.223 is easier to find than 7.62x54, and 7.62x39 is much cheaper than 54. Plus I want a semi auto rifle.

#4 Home to me. #5 Guns galore.

Gun without ammo. I could spend hours every day cycling it, cleaning it, talking it apart...mmmmm Would you rather get aroused by every inanimate object you see, or live in poverty.

Noticing a lot of avoiding my little questionair.

I did some thinking and I'd like to get everyone's opinion (yes it relates) let's pretend all these people are alive, their crimes are recent, and we have all the facts we currently have. How would you sentence these people. Please include specific punishment, how long they are to be sentenced if not death, any special additions to there punishment, and whether or not they will be rehibilitated, or given special treatment. Pol Pot: Leader of the Khmer Rouge which is responsible for 1.4-2.2 million deaths. Andres Behring Breivik: Killed 77 people, and injured 319 Jeffrey Dahmer: Killed 17 people but was also convicted of child molestation Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold: Killed 13 people and injured 21 James Eagan Holmes: Killed 12 injured 70 George Zimmerman: Killed 1 These are ordered from most killed to least killed. I picked them because they were the first I thought of (besides Hitler)

I'm going to disagree on that. People who regularly commit crimes, gangs, solo, mafioso, what ever, do worry, but they weigh it against what they believe they'll get out of it, over time it becomes their life. If the didn't fret over the conequences, people wouldn't rat, there wouldn't be informants or people who give up their partners for a better sentance.

Not really, she was bringing up how it's a matter of perspective and they are using the death penalty (I think, if that wasn't your point I misunderstood) and I was showing how it was completely different. Still on topic I think it does. The system will never be perfect, the inoccents will always be punished, and very few of those 4.1% will ever get that one appeal that proves their innocence, so either way we are treating them as a criminal, it can also be reasoned that we are treating them worse by forcing them to spend the rest of their life in a place full of criminals. This is true, I will agree with that, but as you said "not always" sometimes it is needed, a serial killer kills 12 people, and we can prove it was him, it's appropriate, killing is a pleasure for him and there is a good chance he'll continue in prison if he is truly mentally unstable.

I think it might be saying suicide is genetic but idk I got a 4.4.