WISD0MTREE
-
Posts
3232 -
Joined
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by WISD0MTREE
-
-
On 7/26/2019 at 3:48 PM, Stadius said:
Before you start rifting through your keypad, or click that back button, hear me out.
No.
On 7/26/2019 at 3:48 PM, Stadius said:D) (Disclaimer: this ones a bit of a stretch, but it’s been an itch) Have the ability to form militias out of pop. Not necessarily Soviet style conscription, but when you’re being rolled by two alliances with barely a margin over you, there should be a means to fight back.
I wouldn't call it a stretch, especially since it's happened before IRL many times. PaW already sort of has this, though. A percent of your pop will act as defending soldiers in ground battles. If you attack someone who has no ground forces, you'll still lose a few troops.
-
2
-
-
On 7/20/2019 at 1:36 PM, TheSnipe said:
Some nations started accumulating spies even past their economic capabilities and that proved to give them an unfair advantage over the rest.
There was nothing wrong with having 244 spies. The kill formula just needed tweaking.
-
1
-
-
On 7/18/2019 at 8:23 PM, ComradeMilton said:
That's usually not how that saying is used because any two numbers can generally be turned into a fraction.
It may be different from wherever you're from, but that's common use where I'm from.
-
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
By "you" I was referring to your coalition.
I must've missed that official statement somewhere.
-
Just now, Tiberius said:
Yet your coalition is crying saying
So we can agree that I've never said it. It's just the usual salt found on both sides of any conflict.
-
7 minutes ago, Singha said:
This thread is pretty spicy right now xD
This forum is known to get pretty savage at times. See:
-
18 hours ago, ComradeMilton said:
Oh, typo. Well, now you know what I'd intended to post.
Alright, let's use what you meant.
For simplicity, let's assume PaW has been around for 4 years. If CN has been around for 50% time than PaW, 1.5*4=6. Therefore, it is safe to say that PaW has been around 4 of the 6 years CN has been around. 4 of 6 can be represented by the fraction 4/6. I stand by my statement that PaW has been around for a fraction of the time CN has.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Dio Brando said:
*is using light theme*
valid cb
-
5
-
-
2 minutes ago, Malal said:
As someone who uses the dark theme, I'm pleasantly refreshed by not seeing a white highlight for once.
Wait, people actually use the light theme?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Micchan said:
Declaring wars is so 2018, cool guys now hit their protectorates
KT was doing that back in 2017 (Animal Control Crusade) before it was cool.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Tiberius said:
If you are winning and Coalition B have a 2-1 advantage with more planes, then surely that shows planes aren't as OP as you make them out.
Where did I say that?
1 hour ago, ComradeMilton said:If you'd read what I posted with a little more care, I'm saying PW has only been around 50% longer than CN. That's not a fraction.
-
5 hours ago, Sketchy said:
As opposed to not forcefully declaring war?
"Yeah, EoS is probably gonna declare war on you if you feel like it. Is Tuesday at 8 good?"
-
4
-
-
7 hours ago, ComradeMilton said:
CN's been around about 1.5x as long as PW. That's not a fraction.
even if your side successfully beg Sheepy to try to let you win
If you read my post, I said PaW was around for a fraction of the time, not the other way around.
I don't know what this is, other than winning.
-
3 hours ago, ComradeMilton said:
You admitted one line up that there are just under 3,000 players. That's not dead at all.
From the dictionary:
no longer having interest, relevance, or significance - Seeing as how PaW has almost 6 times as many nations as CN despite PaW having been around for a fraction of the time, I would argue CN's relevance and significance is minimal, if existent.
lacking in gaiety or animation - I haven't played CN, but from what I've heard, there is a severe lack of dynamic™ political action. A certain alliance has held the top spot for ages. Some have said the spheres there haven't changed in a long time, nor have the leaders or influential players been replaced.
devoid of former occupants - Seems self explanatory since the population of CN has declined in recent years. While there are a few former occupants, the number has significantly dropped in recent years. Using linear approximation from random dates where I could find archives over the past 3 years, CN will have no players by Q1 of 2021.
Would you feel better if we called it a dead game walking instead of a dead game?
1 hour ago, ComradeMilton said:Which is just what you could be doing now and finding success without Sheepy having to hold your hand while doing it.
k
-
2 hours ago, Hariff said:
Not that it particularly matters, @Alex but it doesn't seem to me like Fraggle will be moving off the top nation score spot anytime too and even if someone tries to catch up they have very little chance unless the entire game throws money at their military, nation etc
Still unfeasible as the 1 nuke per day limit is keeping anyone who starts now ~550 nukes behind, if I recall Fraggle's nuke count correctly, and cities get extremely expensive. If someone tried to catch up in infra, it would make more sense for Fraggle to forgo a few nukes fighting the person. The immense amount of infra damage, due to the high cost of the infra at the level required to even come close to competing, would greatly exceed the nuke's cost and score loss.
1 hour ago, ComradeMilton said:CN's still going. Kevin has never cared and it's run. It's far older than PW and is still running.
CN has 2,853 nations in existence. PaW has 17,578 as of now.
1 hour ago, ComradeMilton said:I didn't claim what you're saying I did. At least you did admit CN is not dead.
Congrats, you know one of the many definitions of the word "dead." How fricking obtuse can you be? CN is dead.
-
17 minutes ago, Daitoツ said:
Ladies, ladies break it up! There's more tampons in the next aisle! Jeez.
What if they prefer pads?
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, Sir Scarfalot said:
>Bloc, Worlds at War, Dying Horizon, >Clop, Compounds, POST, >Bloc TRW, Bloodcoded, City of Heroes, and Star Wars Galaxies off the top of my head.
You forgot about Power and Attrition.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Kurdanak said:
How long have we been playing this game if you go from early beta?
I mean, I joined the forum in January of 14 and you joined even earlier, so...
A tad too long.
-
1
-
-
Leaked KT ally chat logs. Hopefully this doesn't allow IQ to gain the upper hand in the war.
-
19 minutes ago, Buorhann said:
With TJest disbanded @Frawley, does this count against Coalition A or B?
IIRC, TJest wasn't included in the stats since they were hitting both sides and the tracker couldn't handle that.
-
4 hours ago, Epi said:
Just wanted to comment, that the upvoters in this thread are like the unholy alliance ... Wisdom.
I only voted on one thing ITT, which was a down-vote for this:
On 5/29/2019 at 11:45 AM, Elijah Mikaelson said:I do not think you or you're alliance could afford the bottom dollar of what a basic crap bot would cost.
-
I feel like we've been down this Trail before.
-
2 minutes ago, 丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ said:
Does that include leap years?
The real question is if it will skip an additional leap-day in the 50th century to be aligned with the Earth's rotation or if they'll stick with the Gregorian Calendar, which will be one day off by then.
-
41 minutes ago, Justin076 said:
Honestly, if this shit is still going on in August Im peacing.
"Leap, fellow soldiers, unless you wish to betray your eagle to the enemy. I, for my part, will perform my duty to the Templars and my @Horsecock, bank robber, and the other triumvir dude."
-
1
-
We should disband the US government
in General Debate
Posted
No Hughes Amendment, NFA, GCA, 922r, stupid import laws? Sounds great, especially since I can use them on pedo slave owners!