Anarchist Empire

Very ironic you went to tell them lies about me, got fully slotted after trying to BS them about me rather than succeed in causing bad blood.

Mostly just since you suddenly showed up & they made that claim. Each other one was a lie, so was pretty sure that was also. lol

Nanami still hasn't even tried explaining why they did it, no excuse given even. All they've done is ask for money when messaging me. Asking for handout without even giving a real reason. That Fish Face thing is just what they told some person who asked if they just extorting money or had their feelings hurt. Nanami seems have said both there. That's BS, never tried even justifying it or ever implying they even want peace. So it's them who's obsessed with me purely. Closest I've seen to a reason is them just telling someone obvious BS, claiming they were crying all night over nothing. Their reputation is in shambles with many they tricked into attacking over fake crying or no reason they want to say. Just went to sleep and woke up with them just total psycho crazy person over nothing. They'll lose, they do every stupid mistake possible. They probably are greedy enough over virtual money they'd backstab someone if paid enough, so I almost wonder if they were paid. Since they do have very loose morals (if any) & will do stuff if paid. With them never giving me a reason & telling someone else it was they cried all night since they were free to interact with my members and someone called them Fish Face. Which is funny. Really even before I went to sleep Oily (RIP, Vacation Mode now); said he was going to destroy my alliance again since we countered one of their raids & asked Nanami for permission; with Nanami I think gave it. So claiming credit for sabotaging VoA before, but didn't take it to serious and was tired. However they already had nations attacking us & threatening to destroy our alliance for countering before I even went to sleep when I think back on it. They never had a real reason and just attacked. My 2CI accepted a Muslim guy into the alliance they wanted to troll nonstop & Nanami said they disliked was actually the real reason probably. Even if Nanami said they weren't going to escalate; but weren't willing to peace current war on the guy; Oily ordered more people to attack Agora AA after was accepted & threatened total war to the death if we countered. Of course don't take orders from them or give them permission to attack my AA. Not even sure what happened with that guy or we countered since I wasn't in range, but it was me & them disagreeing on whether I had a right to counter attacks on my AA they started conspiring together to destroy my AA in my channel. So Nanami breaking their word & us maintaining our right to defend our AA is why they decided to do it as one possibility. Even though I was tired & doubt we had a counter on him before I went to sleep. Naruto attacked our alliance also for some reason, but got him in a blockade before going to sleep. When I woke up a few hours and looked briefly at Discord at way later; Oily was stressing for me to leave beige asap even though pointless; but I just went back to sleep. Whole time I was sleeping Oily was obsessing over me being on beige as I had Naruto blockaded, as if they sent Naruto to attack. They also seemed to have something to do with Naruto attacking with how obsessed Oily was when I woke and just logged into Discord for a moment still on beige before just going back to sleep. So me countering Naruto whom they sent to attack is another possibility. Real realize will probably always be shrouded if they were already coordinating to get people to attack before I went to sleep though. None of those if the excuse are nearly good enough to justify it, so their excuse barely matters unless it implicated someone else as involved. No reason to randomly suspect more involved than them in plotting it.

You took stuff out of context, last one was in regards to Stanko always expecting me to let alliances attack my lower tier & immediatly peace; turn the other cheek every time. There have been no new raids since my BW counter & saying that on my profile; so seems effective atm. Ahom Empire/The Ancient Empire did agree to not resign that treaty & severing it was part of the peace agreement when they were asking for peace. So they did violate that. Interesting how much you watch my nation though. If all those alliances are attacking AK because AK did a raid when there was no apparent treaty; then all of them attacked AK as soon as there wasn't an apparent treaty. So ironic excuse and under the same I can counter any who still try hitting AK with new wars over that and will probably. We have an active treaty direct now and it was public before blackwater attacked, so countered them even if Raccoon War is still going on and going well. Every single one of those alliances Nanami wanted to have fight for them have wanted to peace out & peace agreed upon with various circumstances. Most seemed tricked, but Naruto said he was planning to attack ever since I cancelled an ODP with him after I found out he was lying about me behind my back. (In specific telling banks I had agreed to cosign loans when I told him I would not do that when asked. Since don't trust him that much even before that. Now he broke peace agreement, so not very trust worthy in general.) Do see you guys are making up random additional lies to more alliances about me. I never even said anything about Singularity. Just complete BS, like how you tricked many of those alliances who took a bunch of pointless damage because of you guys and no longer like you guys. So all your support is gone, as you desperately try spreading more lies to try getting others against me. Pathetic tactics of weak enemy. Unlike them I don't feel a need to go around making up lies to try tricking alliances to try getting help. I have zero doubt I will win from the start and don't need to resort to petty tricks. Ironically Lemeon is triple slotted by Singularity for attacking them. Not sure if before or after he BSed them he attacked. They did show me that & I've never mentioned them in my server. Or made any claims. I doubt either of us would ever admit defeat and nuke forever if needed if the other one wanted to try that. Do have some respect for Singularity, took on most of the game one global. So not cowardly like many in this game who only fight if huge odds in their favor. Also he wasn't so obsessed with me he can't stay out of my servers even though they can't handle interacting with people; they could have saved themselves a lot of tears & this war. It's Raccoons obsessed with me, where won't leave me be. Now crying within a few days of war. He wants 200m because he wanted to be in my server and couldn't handle being called a name when trolling? Good bye from server & war it is I suppose. I won't argue for peace when reason I've seen is so terrible & zero attempts at amends from your side. Just begging me for money. Also lmao at thinking I'd have a crush on him. Fish face, who stalks me around and then cries.

Wow, you really came 10 days late to say that? You get a life. BTW your protectorate attacked my ally. Going to be defeated next turn. They were pretty confident you guys would attack me if I countered them. Y/N? https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=2034931

Everyone other than Raccoon have been granted peace with them wanting no further involvement as update on this. We still consider a state of war with raccoon.

Even when my main focus is targeting I guess what could be considered griefers in how people are using the word. (Raccoon); still can make money just mixing in some raids with others slot. Since can't actually nuke and missile everyone if using them all. Attacking them if they're trying to ruin you is better than trying to change game mechanics. So not very efficient just doing zero infra thing. I can still win raids with days worth of buys. I don't like using that word, since they can only cause you grief you mentally feel that. I'd rather just focus on beating them than feel grief. Just fight them. Doesn't matter if I'm nuked. Even those who revolve their gameplay around just nuking, you can prevent them making much money & wasting all their nukes. So can't make anything on that. So can do damage by preventing them from making any gains if they actually go out of their way enough where it's worth doing. (I have a fight fire with fire attitude, just adapt to whatever the enemy. Don't think changing mechanics to help is the way, this change would be bad for them; but still don't support it.) If you need to attrition nuke a city at least 1.5k infra to break even on cost; they're not overly cheap I think. Even 2k infra is barely worth if just going for damage on attrition. Gives me a net positive in damage/expenses towards them in our war whenever they nuke. So I look at it positive and good if they try nuking.)

Even if other person doesn't get to see "Infra Damage" stat, war is still costing them & they're handicapping themselves with bad builds doing that mostly. Where they need to stockpile everything they use, so could be cycled. (You need power for most types of attacks, but since nukes aren't connected to any city; guess they can be ussed anyways. However I have seen that build & just looked pointless to me. Nothing special giving an edge. (Wouldn't really matter if a nation needs to spend 100k on infra before nuking, so just seems pointless to care about that.) If limiting themselves to just fighting one type of way, they're also limited in damage they can do & profits they can make during it. I prefer flexbiity where I can fight all ways. So if they let down their guard anywhere, can even beige huge up declares. (So seen that build, thought it interesting they didn't need power to build nukes, but they're just handicapping themselves. Makes sense they can, since that project doesn't require power.) People don't complain calling it greifing when people attack and do damage other ways. Placing bounties is a feature, one could call that griefing if they think others wanting to try doing damage is greifing.

Buying max aircrafts daily probably is the most expensive thing other than maybe tanks to max buy daily, Changing it so you can buy 1/3rd your maximum daily would make even more expensive to max buy daily, but would make it possible for people to keep trying to fight conventionally; as long as they have enough resources and cash to afford to keep trying to double buy air, even if daily limit is boosted where it would matter if they do. So doing so people can buy 1/3rd daily would do so rather than one side in war often just reduced to nuke turreting & pointless to even try buying any air; both sides could keep trying to fight conventionally if they have the resources to afford it & other side lets them keep refilling on resources if they don't already have a huge amount on hand. So boosting air daily buy would make trying to fight back conventionally more possible even after having been depleted if someone wants to keep trying to win conventionally. Would encourage people to have more resources on hand & more tactics for people to use once their has been destroyed beyond nuke turreting. So would probably also help with inflation on resources if people think that's an issue if people can buy more of their cap daily on air; since even currently at 1/5th it costs a lot of aluminum to max buy air daily. Would be even higher if at 1/3rd. So would allow alliances to keep up the conventional fight longer if they have the resources to afford it. Which I think would be a good thing. Rather than trying to nerf few ways people can fight back still once air is gone, should do so if people can afford it still; more possible to fight back in ways other than just nukes. (Should maybe change it to 1/3rd for all types of units. Ships also, so people can try fighting conventionally longer & burn through resources faster fighting.

Not sure why he wants to make projects people bought worse, when if he thinks nukes are to powerful; boosting SDI would be more logical. Make someones investment pay off more they made, rather than make projects people already bought worse. (I dont' agree they're to cheap or powerful, they do get blocked enough. Still boosting projects rather than nerfing them is what he should do if he doesn't want to let us freely swap out those projects with a full refund after he does it.) Most recent case someone attrition declared me with intent to nuke turret, 100% of their nukes got blocked and missiles. So they just lost money on their attacks, so SDI is probably good enough. Still boosting that would be best way to deal with it if he thinks nuking is OP) I purely profited from them declaring and they occupied a defense slot while doing no damage. Even not all wars go that way, there is a chance. So those who have bad luck in few wars they've fought since they avoid war mostly, shouldn't modify the game for them.) I've fought many hundreds of wars. Sometimes the missile and nuke defense seems really strong; other times useless. Just luck. (I don't purely nuke turrent, I fight in all ways though. Most recent 2 wars I just finished them off conventionally since I could, even if attrition declared on one and the other attrition declared on me). Just another weapon in the arsenal and not OP.) I don't really like how troops and ships have a way higher population requirement than aircraft and tanks (As well as requiring 5 days to max them out, so with everything else nerfed overcoming people with max aircrafts will just keep getting hard, since 1/5th thing does so takes forever to max them out. Should change it to 1/3rd buy per day on aircrafts if you want people to keep trying to win conventionally and have a chance), think that is probably the most unbalanced thing about the war system atm. Not nukes or missiles. (Can sometimes win with double buying other stuff from zero if they have bad builds focused almost purely on air, but air once you've been depleted; it's a lost cause to buy more usually. Even if you get 5 days of beige, few people who are useful fighters want to sit out a war for a full 5 days to rebuild their air. So better to nuke. I tend to lack patience to stay on beige long enough to even get more than a days worth of military buys in. Boring on beige.)

Even if he doesn't do these things, that he makes it sound like he wants to makes game not seem stable. Where people don't know what projects are worth investing in, since don't know what will suddenly be made almost useless. Even after he increased costs to get the project. So this idea is bad enough doubt it will happen, but he needs a project swap feature added to the game if he wants to nerf our projects. Where you can freely swap out projects for another if he modifies it without needing the infra if you decide it's not worth having anymore. (As well as refund on the project in cases where he nerfs it after you bought it. Would seem if he did this & added drones, suddenly drones would be the better project in most cases. Less people would have defenses for it, could do resistance damage & even now nukes are only worth using on people 2k infra at least for the actual damage. So only really high infra nations would they have any use with this, since drones would be better for resistance damage.)

Maybe can rename this to politics and hugs, replace war button with hug button. Since apparently fighting and attacking is griefing now. (Already if someone has less than 2k infra in a city, barely even worth the cost of the nuke if it connects. Even at 2k infra with attrition, only 24k damage. So person uses 12 MAP with chance of it being shot down in an attrition war; they only maybe get less than 4x the cost of the nuke in damage. Someone needs a lot of infra in a city for it even really be worth the damage. Only extreme whale cities 2.5k+ are they really doing much damage. Nuke someone with less than 1k per city,, you're spending around 10x the amount on the nukes than damage done. So only people with 3k+ cities who want to be immune from damage are probably complaining about this. Should at the very least double the damage they do if you're going to double the cost. So still worth using in some situations. Last person who tried nuke turreting me, just ended up negative 15m from expenses trying, since both got blocked and their missile. Then they also got looted, since I beiged them. So was just pure profit for me that they tried. So already nations risk just coming out at pure loss and benefiting those they declare on if they nuke turret. (Then at the very end they tried building up conventional with infra & units to prevent me from finishing them convetional, so I finished them with a nuke. However damage done with the nuke infra wise was still less than the cost of the nuke. All the infra damage I did combined in that attrition war maybe came out to cost of the nuke I finished them with. Even though they bought to 1.5k infra per city or something right at the end. So even at the infra level, just come out even on the cost of the nuke max. If attrition war, otherwise less. So mostly just for the resistance reduction are they currently worth using on nation which don't have a lot of infra. Double the cost, will only do worthwhile damage on really high infra nations. Kind of ridiculous. (Maybe double the population requirements for aircraft if you want to do this, so nations can't just be at 1k infra per city with max air force & not worth nuking)

Why require a project and not just improvements for these? Also if you already want to nerf nukes and missiles, why are you thinking of adding cheaper thing similar? Odd you both want to make projects people already got for a purpose similar to this worse, as they need a new project if they want cheap units which can by pass other defenses. Project switching is a hassle. (if you consider it griefing if people are able to attack by passing other defensive units, seems you're just adding another way for people to grief if that's your thoughts on nukes and missiles.) Also even they start cheap, if you suddenly double the cost of nukes. No reason to think these won't suddenly be more expensive later if people use the project slots on it. People who don't want to take any damage when they're on the side with huge number advantages will eventually complain people who are able to damage them back are griefing rather than just dying, then made more expensive later.

Let's double the cost of air crafts to fix the air attack griefing strategy next with people attacking each other. As well as declare war button griefing strategy people use to attack others in this game. More seriously, bad idea. (The 1k infra minimum in a nation seems like it wouldn't matter, so w/e there.)

Whatever, WAP said they didn't want to fight me & Dawn isn't hitting us anymore. So have real enemies to focus on if WAP isn't getting involved in that.

When was I couped? As for this alliance, they're essentially just Amon Empire. Same leader.

What's amusing is even if OP was joking or whatever; did bring attention to Raccoons were started by a scammer & now Barboros has left not wanting association. So now they just have the actual scammer, Oily as their gov.

I'm of the side of the LIght. With the Children of Light and Children of Darkness said to not get along for Centuries. So explains why me and Raccoon can never get along and they always want to sabotage me that they worship the dark entities; which hate the light.

Religion is a part of this game, even pick one for your nation. Guess you missed that part of the game. You did it on your nation page, your religion is dark forces. So explains quite a bit. State Religion: The Dark Force

Actually Raccoon who began all this, with Oily deciding he wanted to try seeing if he could destroy my alliance & Nanami deciding to go with it; since Dencave accepted some Muslim into the alliance Nanami and Oily didn't like; so wanted free reign to attack my members & make threats on that if any were countered. So it's them who feel like as long as I'm around, we'll always be at war. Even if I forgive past transgressions, then they try again screwing me behind my back. So this time, no reason for me to stop before breaking their alliance. I'm a Christian, but can only turn the cheek so many times before it's obvious some people will always be enemies.

I've spoke with range of opinions from do something about; to don't think we'd counter, etc. Some prefer I attack, some prefer to downplay it. None are their leader, so not sure what he thinks exactly..

I've met plenty, but don't fully buy it when they say they signed a pointless protectorate they have no intention of doing anything with.