Anarchist Empire

Texas Holdem Poker would be sweet build in, on my last role remember various alliances would organize poker games ever now and then; which were fun. However kind of a hassle needing to use outside app. I think more minigames where people bet against each other would be good.

The only benefit I see to this is maybe inspire more conflict, with more alliances resisting being pushed onto the low income colors. (Rich get richer for being dicks to all the newer alliances and nations, maybe more would revolt if the difference is made bigger. This suggestion doesn't make me want to feed into the delusion some have they can control who's on a color.) I don't believe alliances can control it, so penalizing them more for not doesn't make much sense. If any alliance is upset I'm on green, they should blame the game mechanics for penalizing them. Rather than feeling super entitled. While some might ask polite, most don't bother and just feel elitist; bossing others around. Think last person who asked me suggested purple, see it's the worst color in the game. yeah right. Advice doesn't seem so friendly when told to go to really bad colors, as people are asking a favor. Color mechanic might be more interesting if alliances put their training AAs on the colors of their competitors; rather than conspiring together with all the big alliances to harass all the smaller ones onto really bad colors; where they also force their training alliances to be. The big alliances don't use it in an interesting way.

Sam Cooper is 2 separate voteable options for the first one, lol.

Maybe it's time you and me make a sphere. To compete maybe. (Also reason for this withdrawal is obvious when I gave it another thought, but not something I'd say on OWF.)

Makes it look like sail is some huge hegemonic force with the outline. lol (In practice I doubt all those alliances are all that close.)

I gave it a up vote, since I wish the alliances involved good luck with this. Not because I'm happy to see ODOO falling apart and wish those still in ODOO luck as well.

I like the name. Reminds me of zelda of course, also some of the forces which made up everything in the Universe seem to come in 3s (Like everything being different configurrations electrons, neutrons, protons, then further down think they're made of 3 different types of quarks, etc). (Not sure what caused that peace within 24 hours thing, but seemed obvious ODOO was done with after that. Although I don't know the reasons for this personally.) I think names like this are better than random letters people usually use for blocs.

All except Carthago, they need to pay their debt first. (Or it will just get nuked) I'm not as easy as Rose and ODOO to beat. By the time they realize I don't break, their damage will probably be pretty high. I don't think they're smart. Proof they've started learning something will be when they pay their debt they owe; until then they can keep getting hit & distracted from rebuilding. That debt isn't going to suddenly disappear for them, just because they decide they don't care about their reputation. Since I have no grudges against any other alliances, might as well give them the attention they crave.

They were so confident, they didn't want me to hit Carthago at first.Told them they better win then and proves their no beige military strategy sucks if they lose. Not sure what they were thinking declaring, telling me that I'd interfere with ODOO ops if I attacked as I planned before they hit; then they caved within less than 24 hours. At least now they won't interfere with my Carthago war. (Both Rose and them took a huge PR hit for this probably. Hard to think of them the same anymore) All they accomplished way get in my way in regards to carthago.

Kind of interesting theory from someone from SAIL regarding Carthago. "but yeah. I get what youre saying. You think that that AA did your buddy dirty. It's just, I mean. Idk if I would trust him because it is such a small amount. In peace I make more than he lost in just a few days. There has to be something else happening here. They wouldnt just keep his deposits for war dodging. At least I dont think that they would. That will get them a really bad reputation" Why would they claim they are if they aren't? Lie to get a bad reputation? I think Carthago just has no common sense & likes having bad reputation. Either they enjoy having a bad rep, or they just have no common sense. I could fight them months & feel I'm accomplishing something as long as I keep doing damage with nukes and cruise missiles daily. That's the kind of reputation they want for themselves. Alliance people feel just deserves to be attacked until they stop being how they are. I think I'd be doing them a favor if I kept it up until they stopped this type of behavior. Gov from another alliance told me before the global ended they do it all the time; where if they think it's mathematically beneficial to screw a member they know are loyal, they will. As well as their entire gov hates Carthago, so they do have bad reputation with those who know them. Found it interesting SAIL as well found it almost unbelievable my member wasn't in on some conspiracy, since wouldn't make sense for them to ruin their reputation so badly. So PR wise? Carthago already taken massive damage. With people who were on their side in the war. I'd never coup an allaince and steal their bank, since some types of damage is way worse than monetary damage and not worth it. Damage to their reputation is worse probably than any amount of infra damage I do. I'll keep mentioning why in my war reasons, in order to make sure their members know. Those still there, I'll just have to assume need to be notified somehow. With a declaration on them the best way to let them know, where they read it. Since makes no sense for any to stay if they get robbed like that if there is a war, if they wait until the next global; can't leave so easy.

😜

The length of these NAPs seem kind of overkill, even if I can see why SAIL would prefer this. (Going to want to get their money worth if they rebuild all their nuked infra.) Not all that bad, I like fight my own way. Also now Carthago can't try saying after the war delay tactic regarding that deposit money. (Proving they weren't willing to send it without me doing damage at the very least, whether that can convince them; we'll see. So had no reason to keep holding off, when it was clear they were just stalling in negotiations to see if the global would end and then still wouldn't send it. They did waste a lot of my time pretending they were willing to maybe send it, but then were just wasting time pointless. However probably good I held off until after this, so wouldn't somehow get dragged into it.) Using myloot command with Locutus BOT — Today at 2:27 AM Anarchist Empire losses: (1 nations) Converted Total: $628,439,641.98 losses: (350 nations) Converted Total: $10,119,218,295.93 Think it means I've spent around 600m doing 10b damage. (If resources used count as damage). So I do pretty well fighting how I want. Usually damage I do is just a side effect when I'm raiding, but now I have reason to try maximizing damage maybe. Feel like Carthago has been the way they've been acting, since they don't really believe I can do much damage to them. So need to prove it. When I initally asked about it on their server, they posted screenshot of my alliance before banning as reason not to care. So it's mostly a matter of them only caring if they think they'll take a hit for it. (Only nation I spy oped on them had over 200m cash on hand, also resources. So just one of their nations carrying more than the amount on hand normal. So not a matter of it being to much money for them to afford to pay back as an alliance.) He was 38 hours inactive when I did the spy op, so maybe he was just ensuring he wouldn't get kicked for having the money in the bank. Since don't think the nation had any war histroy, so war dodger for not contributing if he had a bank deposit probably. The bots can't calculate an estimate for loot on most of them. However good chance a lot of them keep it on hand with their bank policy. However I'll find out over time. (They claim policy is if inactive or not contributing enough in war; then you're a war dodger, get kicked & lose your deposit there.) 02/01 03:45 am You successfully gathered intelligence about Katzenzungen. Your spies discovered that Katzenzungen has 60 spies, $203,522,070.04, 26,433.05 coal, 6.00 oil, 281.60 uranium, 5,174.04 lead, 31.00 iron, 31.00 bauxite, 4,128.42 gasoline, 5,754.39 munitions, 2,934.50 steel, 3,916.50 aluminum, and 0.00 food. Your agents were caught and identified by Katzenzungen's counter-intelligence forces. The operation cost you $145,492.27 and 1 of your spies were captured and executed.

You guys agreed to it though? Yeah, that was what came to mind for me; farm ville for all of you 4 months. I'll enjoy my wars instead & glad not to be part of this NAP. Would almost think the objective in declaring was getting a NAP, but if it was people wouldn't have cared if I beiged had I attacked sooner.

Some ways you guys remind me of how I like to run alliances. Congrats. Being a tax farm? Not worth whatever grants, no taxes & raiding is better. Also the tax farm nations need to worry more about their infra and such.