Ronald Wilson Reagan

realllly late and I hope you figured it out by now but for the record: Unchecking 'Soldiers Use Munitions' is far worse than not having enough munitions in a battle. Your soldiers will become horribly ineffective in combat, at the benefit of not using your last munitions. "Soldiers fight with 75% more effectiveness when equipped with 1 Munitions per 5,000 Soldiers. Soldiers automatically use available Munitions when defending." Even if you had more numbers (you did), your opponent's certainly sufficiently equipped forces would have beaten you.

Late, but... To be fair, two nations on the same network working together is textbook multi behavior. Even if they aren't multis you really should have seen that coming if you read the game rules.

I'd figure with Alliance Affairs being more strict, it would be so that people don't bring up so much old news.

Just a pet peeve, don't 95% of city builds utilize nuclear reactors? or am I missing something

i know I have absolutely zero leverage to say anything and are pretty much name brand cringe but, what the hell? anyways here's my trash meme. please downvote

To my (probably) flawed knowledge, tanks, aircraft, and ships do not seize money. Equpping your soldiers with munitions will not increase the maximum loot. You should only equip them with munitions if the enemy has a sizeable ground force.

I've been looking forward to wiping the slate clean for a while now. Welp. Here it is. 4th Of July, America themed nation. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=316939 Looking forward to this ratio.

Honestly though, the necroposting gets on my nerves,

i h8 wamen 😠

Not sure if this should go in Quality of Life suggestions, but I'm gonna play it safe and post here, move if you must. The premise of this idea is to allow for auto-trading of resources off of the market. So like, automatically buying 70 coal per turn from the lowest seller, automatically selling 800 steel per day to the highest bidder, so and so. My biggest concern would be servers. I'm not very sure if processing multiple auto-transactions would overload the servers too much. I do feel like this could be useful for when you use high amounts of a specific resource, and don't have the time (or immediately available money) to mass-purchase. So what do you guys think? Alright idea? Or another spew of slobber that should have stayed shut in my head.

Seems to be an established alliance. Almost 2 years, good performance. Unless I'm missing something.

I learned my lesson on startups.

It’s alright, was suspicious because Locutus detected me as a multi/reroll in FSO, so I thought ‘Woodstock’ had a bad rep when you pointed out ban evasion.

You talking bout me?

Ah. How fortunate of me to not be given a bounty for my absolute war crime of an alliance. ... Yeah, I'm DEFINITELY getting bounty'd for this. Irony is, we're both nations with Woodstock in the leader title.

u thogt m8

"Using wind power is horrible and anybody who recommends using it is an idiot." -Me, an idiot.

my eyes

can we just agree to stop

I don't really get it. What purpose would the XP serve? Would it be losable? Quite vague, honestly.

I wouldn't say steel and aluminum are necessarily "war" resources. You wouldn't consider Food to be a war resource, would you? On the actual topic; I'd think that existing power plants would sufficiently supply electric heating and not require seperate resources to prevent people from freezing to death.

I understand the naivity, but adding a new resource that serves a singular purpose (food is food so dont bring that up, and every resource is used in projects) is frankly terrible. A 50% boost is pretty significant, and given the context of it being from a statue, it doesn't make sense at ALL. I've given my fair share of stupid ideas, if not more, but Mars Rovers themselves should really just be ceremonial at best, like Moon Landing. And why would the Moon have different resources than on Orbis/Earth? I understand that this game isnt supposed to be all-the-realistic but...

Nitpick: Gasoline resource reserves don't designate the civilian access to gasoline. It's more or less a wartime military reserve.

1. What purpose would it serve? We already have food. 2. Is it a resource? A project? A miscellaneous feature? 3. How much would be produced? How much would it cost? Would there be a hard cap? Too much left to speculation, if it would even serve a good purpose to begin with.