Jump to content

Sargun

Members
  • Content Count

    527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Sargun

  1. how long did it take you to come up with this one lmao
  2. I love the fact that DIO had to ping NPO members to upvote his post so that it would artificially look like people believe him.
  3. Tiberius, delete your account
  4. BK: we want to rebuild our public perception of being a strong military alliance Also BK: call in NPO Edit: it has been called to my attention that TCW said this, not BK Let it be known that BK performed so poorly in this war that I couldn't tell them apart from TCW
  5. in fairness to you, i had to ping multiple people in my alliance to ask them who was in IQ for me to make that lmao
  6. it's the only way BK knows how to win, with other people doing all the work 👀
  7. (ps i only included acadia because i needed a fourth face and i chose somebody that i'd never heard of) (pps edited because @Smith wanted to see their dumb smiles)
  8. alex: i don't think it's okay to cheat but i'm gonna let the community decide also alex: i'm not going to punish cheaters i'm just gonna take away the money also alex: i'll take away their cities i guess but only the ones i can verify were bought with bad money since you guys won't shut up also alex: fine i'll take away some more resources but only ones i can verify even if some others look shady also alex: blink is completely banned, bar none, period alex what the hell happened in between your first five wishy-washy milquetoast responses and then going nuclear? this is ridiculous.
  9. It took me 20 minutes but I figured it out. congrats on the treaty
  10. The only thing dumber than blindly believing anything anyone says on the internet is encouraging other people to do it.
  11. "even if the logs are fake you're guilty either way" wew lad
  12. Since @Buorhann is either being willfully ignorant or is actually partially illiterate in some capacity, let me break this down to him in simple terms: An easily-faked, unverified screenshot is posted showing someone allegedly saying something, and even in said screenshot there's no context to the conversation. As a response to this, people go "wow I thought TKR wasn't going to hold grudges". When the leader of TKR came on and said the logs were fake and even brought their own fake screenshot to prove how easy it is to fake these things, that is the response to those comments. The entire reason those comments exist is because of a fake conversation, so if the conversation never existed, then there is nothing to address. You're asking us to address literally made-up concerns. We have gone to BK and told them we want to mend bridges, and have started to do so. In response to this, Shifty made this garbage up to try and ruin this attempt. The only thing that needs addressing is why you all bit the bait so hard.
  13. shifty: wow look at these bombshell leaks leaks: "if we do go to war i hope they hit us in a few months when we're ready" WOW what a revelation u have really jim-jammed my flim-flam here shifty
  14. Of all the things that didn't happen, this didn't happen the most.
  15. no keegoz you don't understand. we need to literally be more popular than pornography. that is the only way to measure success, is to win over game of thrones or online porn. there is no other way.
  16. hmu i'm always down to vent about garbage tbh also bye
  17. Thousands of them, dude. Thousands.
  18. I don't think anyone in TKR is really trying to minimize the damage TGH and KT/ET did, to be honest. They were great fighters and utilized great tactics, and did a lot of damage. It was the first war in a long time that actually felt like a war. The problem comes when you guys try to say that because you did a lot of damage, and damage alone, that you somehow "won" or got the better of us, even in the surrender thread. Everybody accepts the extremely valiant and powerful effort you put into this loss - there was a lot of respect for your fighters during the war. But when you try to say that you did so much damage to us it may as well be a wash, and you ignore the other factors, we're going to push back. Statistics only tell one side of the story. We get it - you landed a ton of body blows. We just happened to be the bigger fighter. Pretending that this was closer than it actually was is beneath you guys, because I genuinely think it mars the admirable fight you put up.
  19. We've been over this, fellas. We stole the resources from you and then bombed you with your own resources. The ones we used from our own coffers we were able to replenish because we weren't stuck at 400 infra cities - we had dozens of high-infra cities pumping out econ by the end of the war. That means that we had the luxury of being able to waste those resources without doing any harm to ourselves. The "damage" of us using resources to bomb you into submission isn't damage at all: on paper it looks like we spent a finite amount, but the reality is that resources are not finite. They are infinite. We, due to being the victors on an obscene scale, were able to keep our economy going to fund this wasteful excursion. We didn't start running out of munitions or gas, we didn't lose our ability to fight, we weren't running a deficit: everything was completely fine on our end, because we could still produce those resources. To put it another way, this is like getting into drink-off with a bartender. At the end of the day you may have made the bartender drink a lot of booze without paying, but you're going home to a lack of booze and they can just turn around and keep drinking.
  20. he's gonna swap your IQ with his and then laugh at how dumb you are
  21. honestly I just wanted to pad your stats, I spent as many munitions and gasoline as I could on soldiers at the end there
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.