Jump to content

darkblade

Members
  • Posts

    504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Posts posted by darkblade

  1. 7 hours ago, RagnarBuliwyf said:

    Going against my better judgement, I've looked through this entire thread and I see a lot of shit throwing. I genuinely want to know as it's getting brought up time and time again each year. 

    What past actions are people referring to when they claim tkr bad. I've DM'd several of you privately and had either no response, deflected response or no reply. (All valid). So once again I ask publicly. 

     

     

    Here ya go.

    On 4/22/2024 at 1:09 AM, Sketchy said:

    "Rescued"

    ODOO set terms and conditions on us for their entry that were undoubtedly beneficial to themselves. Their entry was self interest, a prid quo pro. By that point in the war, we had already taken all the damage we were going to take.

    Peace negotiations with SAIL and us would have taken place and been finished well before the extended war would have, had parties remained in the coalition instead of peacing out.

    We could have taken a long NAP and sat and allowed for things to play out without us. It would have been more beneficial for us to do so. We opted to make a deal that would prolong the conflict we had already been fighting for 2 months (preceding 2 months of fighting others) in order to make a move that would benefit all parties, That would have committed us to at least 5 months of straight war.

    The assertion that we were rescued from anything is laughable. I'm not going to expand on what your terms were, despite the various wild claims being made here, but the fact is, you guys had a deal on the table that worked for you, and that is why you helped.

    And then you walked away from the deal. And very abruptly. We all know how much of a mess that was.

    As far as us being "angry" goes, I hadn't really intended to get involved in this discussion much. But certain claims were made here that required addressing, and I think it's interesting you guys have chosen to single us out, given everyone else who signed onto the nap, including alliances you claim to have good relations with, and, all in all, we owe you the least here besides perhaps Eclipse.

    TKR immediately planned to attack us as soon as the Fortuna war in which we fought together was over. And they did, bringing in Syndicate. That put us under a NAP cycle, the same one that prompted their entry into our war later on.

    TKR made a deal that, as I said earlier, was beneficial to them, in order to bring themselves in, and then when things got too hairy for them, struck a different deal behind our backs, and attempted to exclude us from the process, which would have inevitably left us in the same war they are purported to have rescued us from lmfao.

    These are all claims I can easily support with evidence, if I have to. Despite all this, we have not gone after or targeted you directly, this entire time. We could have easily sought revenge on TKR/ODOO for your previous attacks on us, we could have easily sought to align with people attempting to hit you this cycle, and, with this nap in place, we could easily align with the current coalition against you. Instead, we have, more than once, attempted to work with you, and find mutual common ground and cut deals with you that would work to our mutual benefit.

    But past behaviour is a pretty good indicator for future behaviour, and TKR has proven time and time again, that collaboration with you ends poorly for us.

    Perhaps you'd prefer me to sit alongside you, whisper sweet nothings in your ear, and pretend like I wasn't one of the alliances who signed onto the NAP? Given who you guys have chosen as the target of your ire here, it feels to me that you'd rather hear comfortable lies than brutal honesty.

     

    • Upvote 1
  2. 11 hours ago, lancelot1 said:

    So you’ve given up defending your decision and decided to start lying instead? 

    I'm not even defending our decision to sign this nap deal. Everyone has the right to be mad over this. Only thing I will say about this deal is that this is the state of the game's politics.

    What I am calling out is the hypocrisy coming from y'all and the lies that have been said about us. Y'all haven't said much about the potential deal Y'all were apart of.

     

    10 hours ago, Adrienne said:

     


    That isn't an accurate recount of the events as we experienced them, and it's not a lack of being invited that we take issue with. We're happy to talk and clear up any misconceptions when your leadership is ready to have that conversation.

    This is why we call you girlboss @Adrienne. Our dms are open to talk this out and get to the bottom of this whenever you want (maybe even squash this beef).

  3. 13 minutes ago, lancelot1 said:

    You guys can go back and forth with the blame game and rationalize your decision all you want but at the end of the day you still just signed a 4 month NAP that was not preceded by a war. I’ve never seen something like that in this game. Regardless of your reasoning behind it, it’s a chickens**t move and it’s pathetic. I hope your members recognize that even if your gov apparently does not. 

    You say that like your alliance wasn't in the process of negotiating a NAP agreement themselves. I don't know what your government has been telling you, but they sure as hell lying. And it's not just us saying this. Everyone who signed this NAP knows that TKR is talking out of their ass and not telling the whole truth.

    • Upvote 4
    • Downvote 3
  4. 5 minutes ago, Who Me said:

    I don't know, why did you guys agree to the NAP?

    Anyway, I'm bored now and have a dog to feed and play with and a book to read, so carry on trying to make yourselves feel good about your choices in life.

    Have fun and I am sure we will be seeing each other when the current NAP ends. It will be time to reduce my stock pile of nukes and missiles again.  lol

    Smartest TKR member.

  5. 10 minutes ago, Who Me said:

    Why didn't you then?

    This is like asking why the chicken crossed the road.

    36 minutes ago, Sketchy said:

    you forced us into the room to make peace after one day. We would have fought on. You cut a deal with t$ and leveraged it to get us all to peace out. Attempting to pin the nap on us because, when faced with a decision we didn't want, we pushed for something that would benefit us more as a consolation prize, is rich.

    • Upvote 1
  6. 3 hours ago, Gaius Julius Caesar said:

    On 04/05, the perpetrator transferred ownership of the servers from the compromised account to a new account (a presumed buyer, according to this account). With the servers effectively lost, t$' govt proceeded with eliminating the now backed up contents of both servers and kicking everyone who wasn't a t$/e$ member (who had already been notified about the situation) to minimize the harm the perpetrator could carry out and to render his ill-gotten gains void.

    image.png.75da3b4a34f1b5cb2f421a7a98ed7a80.png

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.