Jump to content

Ivan Ivanov

Members
  • Posts

    202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ivan Ivanov

  1. 1 minute ago, Prefontaine said:

    The game is simple. Dancing through the mindfield of douchebaggery can be difficult. I would know. I’m one of the largest land mines. 

    Well yes, perhaps I should've worded it differently. The game itself is easy, cities, improvements etc. But the politics are f*** off real deep lol.

  2. 5 hours ago, Ryan1 said:

    I like this idea. That way you can tell if they are just someone who applied and went inactive, or if they are active and probably wondering why nobody has spoken to them.

    Yes. In my alliance, our list of applicants is used for members who become inactive, and it is used as a sort of "holding cell" until they either come back online or have entirely quit the game.

  3. I wish for the ability to be able to sort the bounties list. Maybe have an option that only shows bounties within your War range? Only certain colours (no racism lul)? From highest to lowest award? Score? You get the point. I’m sure it would make bounties and bounty hunting a much more commonplace activity.

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 1
  4. 3 hours ago, Pestilence said:

    Alrighty now i got some time on my hands

     

    So my major issue with this is your want to nerf raiding, while i understand the bit about the nation being inactive, the simple fact of the game is, because of alliances sizes and treaties most raiders cant just hit anyone and profit. I think raiding is a very valid tatic and in fact keeps nations / alliances on there toes so im not really in favor of ending it. 

     

    However i do agree that there should be a incentive to log in more, but id do something more like bonuses 

    1. After 100 days you get 15 mil

    2. After 365 days you get 100 mil + in a ingame award 
    3. After 2 years ect.... 

     

     

    Kinda glad his hasn’t been introduced yet. I lost my 70-75 day login streak because I’ve been on camp

  5. 12 hours ago, Sketchy said:

    Is that why you wanted to know where he lives you fricking loonbag lmfao

    ^this.

    10 hours ago, Justin076 said:

    We need something even worse than a downvote to show our disgust with certain posts. Posters like @Noctis for instance. A downvote doesn’t do justice. 

    And this^

    7 hours ago, KillzBob said:

    Need a "this person is butt hurt" button.

    And finally, this^

  6. 47 minutes ago, Noctis said:

    Its not mass downvoting to downvote some really bad posts I see just reading through a thread, so try again.

    1. lol

    2. And they’re bad how?

    3. This is also why we need laugh emotes

    • Upvote 2
  7. I don’t know if this is even possible, I don’t run the forums nor no the code for them.

    But some peoples posts are just so astronomically stupid that a downvote just doesn’t cut it. We need to show the poster that “Hey! You’re dumb and that’s funny!”.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1
  8. 1 minute ago, endlesshills said:

    This is a great idea that would make tracking your military much less of a headache. Along with this, it would also be nice to add an option to launch an attack again with the same parameters without having to be booted back to the war screen. Combine those two into being able to automatically rebuild units lost in attacks you make and war would be a lot more streamlined.

    Yes! An auto rebuild of units would be a great idea, I’ll add it into the original post.

  9. In cities, you have the option of using city templates that can build improvements for you. This saves time and is quite useful for standardising your nation.

    However, military doesn’t have this system. If you are like me for example, and want whole numbers for your military (e.g 100,000 troops instead of a trashy 103,564, for score reasons or OCD), you are forced to manually calculate the numbers.

    I propose that we introduce a military template system. When you enter the template into the box the system will automatically recruit all the necessary troops required to achieve that number.

    E.G. You have 6500 troops, 82 tanks and 23 airplanes. Your template (for MMR or otherwise) states that you need 10,000 troops, 100 tanks and 30 airplanes. You put this template into the system and you automatically recruit 3500 troops, 18 tanks and 7 airplanes.

    EDIT: endlesshills has suggested that an autorebuid of military units based on the template would be a good idea as well. This would totally negate the need to use the military tab, aside from setting up or changing the template, making wars much more streamlined. Thank you, endlesshills!

    • Like 1
  10. 6 hours ago, Noctis said:

    I could just as easily put him in negatives if I felt like annoying him; although he’ll likely do that on his own without my help if he keeps posting. Lol

    The whole reason I went into the negatives in the first place was because of you, Noctis. I just feel obligated to carry your reputation to the far reaches of the depth of the negatives, like some sort of astronomical quest. At least that’s what I’m calling it anyway.

    Also very much thank you, Patrick Higgins!

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  11. 11 minutes ago, Noctis said:

    The downvotes have zero effect on the allies who matter; also I find how much you care somewhat interesting. Seems many here care about their upvotes more than there than pixels. (Some care deeply about both)

    Seems Settra has moved onto to downvoting someone daily who does care deeply about his upvotes, so seems he’s using his time on something more worthwhile. Although it is interesting to see who cares about their upvotes so much, since you can do more damage they care about just by casting some votes on the forums than declaring war on them. Lol

    Not mad dude but you’re pretty close to 666 downvotes #noctisworstposter2018/19

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.