Jump to content

TheRebelMan

Members
  • Posts

    434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheRebelMan

  1. 9 hours ago, Zyphy said:

    I mean, why is Camelot angry about being called trash?

    During KT, I repeatedly called them trash, and so did many others. And probably most of Orbis would too. 

    Camelot just backs the point up by attacking the smaller dude. Show us you're not trash and dec somebody that'll actually be a challenge .

    Lol

    Difference is, one target is able to kick ass. The other target, TI, well u get it. 

  2. 24 minutes ago, MoonShadow said:

    I did read it all, I did find it funny nor did it bother me, but I guess the homeowners was sick of the homeless guy bring down the value of their home plus the smell did not help much.I can not wait to see if he says anything about my alliance it will be a fun read or will he simply skip us, who knows

    He didn't bring down the value of the home. He tried bringing down ghe value of the neighborhood. Just not all the homeowners took it seriously. Lmfao. 

  3. 11 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

    It’s not a bad basic guide, but if the blitz is done for loot; it’s worth considering the benefits of a blockade. Also if you spy op them & see they are one of the rare cases with pretty much no fuel or munitions. I’ve rendered people’s military’s unusable with a quick blockade at start before doing this & usually don’t look targets myself.

    I’ve also been able to simply blockade, take ground control; then proceed to start bombing what they build the most of on people who have blitzed me with several ground attacks before & not attempting air control. So for people who make mistakes like that, it’s a good starting point.

    Damn man. 

    You sure are persistent.  

    Rofl

  4. 6 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

    Unless they have over $90m cash on hand & you want the loot; in addition to defeating them. If they can send out all their resources as soon as they realize they've been hit; then you could end up with no loot. So if you don't care about loot & they already have a big warchest; then an early blockade might not have much purpose.

    Again

    Very situational. 

    3 minutes ago, Akuryo said:

    Fun fact: 33% is not a majority of 100%.

    Here's an easy way to win wars. Blitz enemy, if they have fortress you airstrike planes. If they don't you hit planes and then ground or ground and then planes if they're bigger but have less ground.

     

    EZ. Nullify planes over ships and trading ability always.

    Unless you are hitting TFP. 

    But how often does anyone hit TFP?

    • Like 2
  5. 9 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

    Still possible to naval blockade someone right before turn change; then grab ground supremacy right after. Doing so if your ground forces are already stronger; grounding most of their aircrafts would already nullify enough units in addition to getting a blockade in. So depends on the circumstances.

    Bro. 

    You are shit outta luck if they have fortress, and most alliances do. 

    And it's always better to airstrike. 

    • Like 2
  6. 12 minutes ago, TheShadow said:

    I did that once or twice
    Didnt really change anything

    You can also play mind-games by continuously telling you will blitz someone so that they think you are lying

    Kinda let when @Jroc keeps asking when everyone is rolling KT. I have my eye on you now, RoqBot #238. 

     

    9 minutes ago, Noctis Anarch Caelum said:

    If you're going to win regardless; starting with a blockade so they can't send out their resources or swap any out can be highly effective. If somebody has no fuel; can win the war on the first move with a blockade. So depends on the situation.

    Problem with what you and MoonShadow are talking about is that it is super situational. U like shouldn't say that stuff on the forums it is that situational. 

  7. 58 minutes ago, Yoda said:

    In all fairness, I checked my logs and confirmed that DB's protection of CoA predates that of tS' protection of CoA and DB. DB did not deliberately contribute to this situation. When we signed the CoA treaty, they weren't tied to tS, Animal Farm or Alpha. If I am not mistaken, Placentica came out of VM to fight in Knightfall and the CoA-Alpha treaty was signed around that time

    So why keep them now? 

  8. 1 minute ago, Rosey Song said:

    Alright, first of all, who are you to make comments on my actions?  Second of all, I declined all interviews on the matter for a reason, I'll thank you to leave me the hell out of the drama, I'm doing what I can to ensure shareholders get their money, and frankly idiots like you only fuel the fire that makes it harder to ensure shareholders are taken care of.  If you wanna pass judgement, do it after people get their money back.

    Lol Exactly. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.