- Popular Post
Justin076
-
Posts
695 -
Joined
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Justin076
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So not only have you nerfed military score to the point where you can be zeroed but still be in range of people with max mil in your city range, but now you've removed the only chance anyone ever had at getting back in the ring if they get knocked down. I mean seriously, have you ever cared to take a step back and evaluate how your changes will impact gameplay? An absolute joke, like seriously, your last few updates have been absolute trash and are destroying the war system. Time for a rollback to the spring.
-
2
-
23
-
I think all of us former and current leaders can recognize the amount of time, hard work, dedication and stress that goes into leading an alliance. Adrienne, you led TKR through a very eventful time period. From Kightfall to NPO's Last Time, you dealt with tremendous adversity, yet you leave leadership with TKR at the number one spot, that speaks volumes! Congratulations on such a successful run and all the best in your retirement
-
3
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
12
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Looks an awful lot like the theory I proposed two weeks ago.
-
9
-
-
7 hours ago, Kastor said:
Why are people worried about the meta changing, its good for the game. If the game was the same from launch to now we wouldn't have seen a lot of Strats that have came out for a long period of time. NPO's turtle Strat, to Arrgh's submarine Strat, to tS's Aircraft only, each Strat changes the game and bring in a new competitor and a new storyline along with it.
So I like the changes, some things will of course have to be tweaked but for the most part, lets go into the abyss together!
There’s a difference between not wanting change and not wanting to see a terrible update implemented into the game.
This update ruins the war system, which will obviously ripple through other areas of the game.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
It's becoming quite clear to me that absolutely none of these changes were tested and simulated as to how they would take affect. The carelessness with just going in and manipulating a few values in the coding and slapping the branding of an "game fixing update" is absurd. Had these changes actually been tested, I pray that they would never have been considered.
Just to bring attention to some of the issues uncovered thus far:
> Air Superiority doesn't affect tanks effectiveness against aircraft (tanks against aircraft, sounds crazy even saying that in a sentence).
> The kill rates have been nerfed but casualties haven't. The kill ratios in an immense triumph ground attack are literally 1:1.
> It's virtually impossible to zero a nation with three fully maxed nations slotting them.
> With no changes to resource use in attacks by units and no change to inflicted casualties but yet a massive nerf to kills, you often will net negative in any IT dogfight? It's literally costing more in resources than you can possibly kill because of how much kills have been nerfed.
These are just a few, more to come.....
-
7
-
2 hours ago, Micchan said:
Guys guys guys an girls stop for a moment
No more ground control able to stop 1/3 of your air, air control still can limit tanks to 50%
Just take air control and keep some tanks, the enemy will never be able to kill your air
Except that as of right now, air superiority does not limit tanks effectiveness against aircraft, only against other ground.
I'm hoping this wasn't the intended set up. @Alex
-
2
-
2
-
-
Tanks can kill 43% of planes, but planes can only kill 14% of tanks. ADD in the fact that planes have been reduced by 3 per slot AND airstrikes cost an additional MAP compared to ground attacks.
You've literally made planes more useless than ground was before this update.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
This is the most mental thing I've ever read. Maybe I'm just not understanding clear but none of this update makes any sense whatsoever. I'm completely fine with a plane nerf, but to nerf planes by literally 50-75% with respect to effectiveness, while also boosting ground units ability to take out up to 43% of a daily buy of aircraft is absolutely ludicrous.
The war mechanics were already unbalanced AS IS, and I'm afraid this appears to exacerbate the problem.
-
12
-
-
There's no doubt there's a bubble in the economy, right now we're not producing enough raws to replace those we're burning in refining. However, you will soon see the power of the free market, as demand for raws increases, so do the prices, as the prices increase, it will soon become more profitable to mine raws than buy them and refine them, people will subsequently start producing more raws. There's nothing to fear, the bubble will be removed through the power of the free market.
Further, I urge noobs to not take the advice of having a couple extra resource slots at the expense of no hospitals or whatever, disease is a killer, if you ran your numbers, you'd realize what you're missing out on when you have 5-15% disease.
-
1
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The best part about this was that it was posted in "Yearly Awards".
-
1
-
13
-
2
-
Thank you to all the Arrgh raiders for your contribution to producing new goods for the Orbis economy. You're important members of this game.
-
5
-
-
15 minutes ago, Firwof Kromwell said:
At least those people traded unlike most of you guys who hoard
-
1
-
-
I wish we could just remove the mechanic all together. I mean really, what logical reason would there be to delete cities. One out of a thousand nations might want to delete a city for some odd reason. We can't guarantee we've seen the last of the Roquentin's and Leo's in this game. Revert this change please @Alex
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Sketchy said:
I apologise for not wanting to see another huge blob after that last one.
How horrible of me lmfao
-
36 minutes ago, Sketchy said:
Good to see at least someone felt the need to break up that huge blob.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Good luck.
-
4
-
-
TKR pushing Engame to the top...
-
4
-
-
We need the heart at the end of NPO’s Last Time. ❤️
-
4
-
-
There is no check box in life son. There's no "are you sure" when you make decisions or say something. This is life son, git gud and git used to it.
PS: Awful suggestion, everyone knows in blitzs, down declares and more, seconds are vital in being successful, having another check box will just slow things down.
-
54 minutes ago, Pubstomper said:
Stuff
-
2
-
4
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Guardian, Grumpy(you're welcome SRD) and alliances with Keegoz, Sketchy and Hodor in high gov...
-
1
-
21
-
1
-
Rose's Blitz....
-
3
-
State of the game, including updates
in Game Discussion
Posted
So to follow up with the previous war killing changes, you're going to introduce a change that puts aggressors at an overwhelming disadvantage. This change creates an environment where no one is ever going to want to pull the trigger. The past changes were massive blows to any incentive to go to war, this change, this is the final nail in the coffin. As mentioned above, when the NAP approaches an end, everyone's just going to decom and build their units into reserve, no ones going to blitz someone if their opponents units aren't killable, and surely aren't going to declare on them and be a sitting duck until their opponent comes active and whips out their reserve. Like I'm getting to the point where I'm actually suspecting the goal of all these changes are to kill the war system, there's no way that you and Alex can get together and come up with not one, but two, but three, but four, but five straight awful ideas. Maybe we need to get the games biggest pixel-hugger off the case.