heidi

There's rumors going round of another game where the mods aren't Unkajo-tier and there is in fact a whole board on the forums dedicated to letting members run with as few rules as possible...

That's irrelevant to this topic. The OP says and it is bang on the money. The Bible says sodomy is a sin, but not homosexuality. It's supposed to be fine if you abstain from any 'immoral' actions, and turn inwardly towards Christ for guidance and contemplation and all that yadda yadda bull.

Wow. Lambda, you're slipping. Sodomy and homosexuality are two different things, related yes, but separated. The bible continually refers to 'abusers/defilers of themselves' and 'lying with mankind' but such statements refer to sodomy, i.e. the homosexual sexual act, not the state of being that is homosexuality.

lol

People of Politics and War! Are you... Tired of forum oppression? Sick of censorship? Baffled by this game's weird mechanics? Then join Worlds at War! Featuring... Free speech forums! A non-Nazi moderation team! A dev who listens to suggestions! An active forum and community! ...and much more besides!

wawgame.eu :333

Definitely. Only a huge band of fa- ahem, persons with differing sexual attraction would lay claim to such a gir- I mean, proud and manly colour.

Except you've just drawn a fallacious comparison. A quote has to be identical by definition, whereas a paraphrase does not. In addition, as I said, it is perfectly possible to apply the word 'exact' to the meaning of the resulting paraphrase, as well as the paraphrase itself - though why you would assume the latter, I don't know: a paraphrase is not a quote. I also notice that you're absolutely fine with debating semantics and definitions with me here, but not actually making your original 'incredibly detailed and airtight argument'. (yes, that was a quote).

It's not an oxymoron at all. You can paraphrase, clarifying meaning, or you can paraphrase preserving the exact meaning, which is what I did in your case. Regardless, you still haven't made your argument, that is of course if you have an argument to make.

I am paraphrasing exactly what you said.

>i can make a perfectly good argument but I'm not going to What are you, 7?

So you discount perfectly valid music and other artistic productions simply because they are associated with ponies? What a sad, bigoted, closed-minded individual you are.

READ MY BLOODY POST. READ IT \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ OPEN THE IMAGE, ZOOM IN WITH THE 'ZOOM' OPTION OF YOUR BROWSER (seriously are you 5?) WHERE I TOLD YOU TO ZOOM, READ WHAT I TOLD YOU TO READ AND THEN YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND WHAT I WANTED YOU TO UNDERSTAND

READ THE LETTER This is why people get pissed off at you. Exactly this reason.

Are you dense? >Cog gave him his account after he got fed up >after he got fed up >after he got fed up Read his letter to rumsod under the last two panels of the Oglaf comic below.

The same way I did: He asked Rumsod right after Rumsod had to clean up a bunch of porn posters and adbots. I wish I hadn't been so effective against those, just so that Rumsod would have kept adding a few more mods... You wot mate? Cog gave him his account after he got fed up, rumsod had nothing to do with it.

You talking to me? Well, why not?

Rip BLOC forums.