dtc justice
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by dtc justice
-
-
You see how quickly everyone attacked you when we start discussing how you leaked all these private convos you had? Do you not see how you solve nothing by posting essays?
-
1
-
-
Phoenyx you want to know why we all laugh at you? You don't understand opsec. You posted 2 private conversations you had with alliance leaders in a single post in this thread. Why would anyone take you seriously and tell you shit when that's what you do?
-
3
-
-
4 hours ago, Buorhann said:
Anyone else chuckled at seeing Guilo educate DtC, and being correct?
😭
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Young Guilo said:
M is Mutual.
LOL well ill just crawl back in my hole.
However it may mean mutual, its always looked at as mandatory
Either way, they did not break the NAP by defending their ally.
-
5
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, Young Guilo said:
AND TIME:
Pantheon did not call in their allies. AC joined the war quote "We're attacking Black Skies.....because we want to".
I know Pantheon is no longer in it's glory days but come on folks. Pantheon wouldn't drag micros in to fight wars for them. Literally this was just an excuse to break the NAP and hit us again.
I'll await those that wish to move the goalposts further.
They don't need to call in allies, treaties are pretty clear. The M means mandatory if you weren't aware. You hit panth, they can defend all they wish and it doesn't count as breaking the NAP on their end.
-
3
-
-
6 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
You may consciously believe that, but you certainly haven't proven it. For a long time now, I have pointed out how we could find more evidence as to the truth regarding the genesis of Global War 16. But I can only point the way towards the door. People like you and others in positions of power are the ones who have to walk through it.
I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree
-
1
-
-
I wonder how many hours phoenyx has spent trying to make all of these posts. With this type of perspective I really think we as a community win and we should continue to encourage Phoenyx to argue his points.
-
37 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:
Not quite. However, I will acknowledge that by and large, my threads have followed certain themes. At first, I came here to try to understand what caused this global war that I suddenly found myself thrust in. As time passed, I began to establish what I felt was the truth on this. I created various threads that I felt presented certain key arguments that bolstered my theory. Now, this doesn't mean that I believe I have all the answers. There are still various things that I'm not sure about. What I frequently find frustrating is that the Quack and non Quack sides seem to be so adamant about their theories- I mean, they can't both be right. For me, the solution to that is simple- look for evidence. It's what I did early on and I came up with 2 key players- Boyce and Ronny's HM leader source. To this day, I'm still not sure why so few people seem interested in exploring these avenues of information.
But in the meantime, I figured I might as well point out what seem to be clear flaws in reasoning, especially if I'm getting attacked just for doing so.
Whats really amusing to me, is that you're basically fresh off the block and you care more about the intricacies of the war than probably everyone else combined. We don't give a fk.
-
3
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
You're on the right track there. Now perhaps you might want to ask yourself why that is...
Its because we see you as the dumb annoying kid on the block that thinks he's tough. You make the same thread over and over again, you solve nothing.
-
1
-
-
I feel like the most obvious name should be
Phoenyx Holmes
-
1
-
-
People down vote you because we want you to be invisible. They downvote anything you post. There's a difference from that and caring about your topic
-
2 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Quack continues to insist that they were going to be attacked and most of the rest of the game insists
Insist...inst,he exposed himself twice in 1 paragraph!
On a side note, phoenyx the old post died off because ppl stopped caring. Go back to being irrelevant.
Or go make a thread regarding the panth war.
-
3
-
1
-
-
I think that the issue isn't that soldiers are op, its that soldiers kill too many tanks in a suicide attack
Half soldiers vs someone max soldiers and tanks kills like 1k tanks
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Phoenyx said:
I think I've learned that I can affect things, despite the many denials I've heard here. How best to affect things is still a work in progress.
I really do hope you're an old re roll that's just trolling, nobody can be this naive
-
1
-
-
Just now, Phoenyx said:
A great deal. One thing for sure- haters' going to hate :-p.
And have you learned anything about how things work in pnw? Because you aren't going to change anything. Globals will continue to happen 2 times per year on average, and sometimes globals will happen because people are bored.
-
9 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Enough weight to get platoons of you guys downvoting my threads. Not the type of feedback I'm looking for, but there's no denying that I've left a mark here.
You bring us entertainment, you are irrelevant. Can't believe you actually think you helped speed up the peace process
-
8 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Honestly, this isn't something I'm really interested in right now. I started this thread to try to take stock of what we've learned from this global war and, hopefully, what we can continue to learn from it.
Thats my point. You're trying to say global wars 1-2 times a year is far too much but you're a brand new nation.
I should ask what have YOU learned from this war?
-
2
-
-
23 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
I see no reason that we need to have global wars and the fact that it seems to only happen around twice a year makes it clear that while it may be cyclical, there are significant pauses between these events.
There is a difference between someone who dislikes wars and someone who is a "pixelhugger". The main issue here is -why- one dislikes wars. Now I think that most people can agree that they don't like having their militaries and infra destroyed, but people different in what they're willing to do to avoid having this done. Some may not care that much for this and live for the thrill of the virtual fight, for a continual stream of wars. I think pirates best fit this description.
Others may favour a more restrained version, cooking up various reasons to get into a fair amount of wars. Finally, there are those, like me, who are in this more for the community then for the wars. Now I've heard some stop playing the game part and just continue talking with people they've met here. Perhaps one day I'll do that, but I think that would make more sense once I have played the game for a long period of time. For now, I like the fact that when one of my Alliance or sphere members are attacked and I'm in a good position to do so, I can counter attack, and it feels good when, if I'm attacked by a formidable foe, I can get helped in return.
As a side note, I actually did try farmville and found it to be dull. Real life has adversity and I do like some realism in my games.
Without global wars, the market would be flooded with rss and excess cash, inflation would be worse than Zimbabwe. Global wars are necessary. If you feel otherwise maybe take a look at the data visualization charts.
People also play pnw for the global was. raids and small alliance wars are rather boring and offer far less planning, coordination, and overall macromanagement which makes the game actually fun.
Inb4 you say 'I disagree with that'
-
7 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
No, I've never been a fan of war. This may seem like a paradox, seeing as I joined this game to begin with. One might question why I did so, and why I continue to play it. The reason is fairly straightforward- it has to do with the fact that wars/battles tend to bring people together to face a common threat. Without such an impetus, it can be easily to stick to oneself. So in essence, I joined this game, as I have joined other war games in the past, not for the wars per se, but for the community and the politics that such wars create.
Not per se, no. This game had war designed into it and I'm fine with that. My issue is not with starting a war, but on determining the credibility of those involved in it. This is -not- a straightforward issue of determining that x or y side is being deceitful. In wars with relatively decent leaders, no side has to be trying to deceive others. The issue here is more subtle- who does more research to find out the truth? I've clearly come to certain conclusions on that. In a way, it's actually pretty easy to determine- just see who -doesn't- want to answer certain key questions in a war and by that method, you can easily determine who isn't a fan of uncovering the whole truth.
And there we have it. You do realize all of pnw economics rely on wars that cost hundreds of billions, and now trillion+ damage? Global wars are necessary to make the flat earth go sideways. You also admitted you dislike wars which means you're a pixelhugger, you just happen to be the most vocal one
Go play Farmville
-
1
-
4
-
-
So phoenyx, am I understanding you correctly when you say you think there shouldn't be any wars that include basically all top 50 alliances?
-
7 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Thanks Seifer, Thalmor, Livonish :-). One thing I will say, it looks like whatever the item @Lord Tyrion was referring to, it may well have been the last issue. Now that it looks like the war is coming to an end, I will say that I had heard it had to do with NAP(s) and possibly their length. If this was actually what he was referring to, I concede that it wasn't nearly as banal as I thought.
Thank you for your service, I hope that your daily threads don't slow down during peace.
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On behalf of everyone in pnw, I would like to thank @Phoenyx for finally ending the war. Your FA is top tier.
I bow down sir
-
7
-
9
-
On 12/11/2020 at 2:29 PM, Phoenyx said:
Perhaps. However, I'm going for quality over quantity here.
Thats funny because your quality posts stopped on your first thread regarding the war.
-
4 hours ago, Phoenyx said:
Here's a question for you- why are you all so focused on peripheral things, such as the quantity of my posts? Did you even read their content or, like Shiho, did you skip that too? I ask you, and the audience, to consider that something else is at work here.
I doubt more than 5 people fully read your 7 posts
-
1
-
SNN-Why Jesus wasn't born in Rose
in Orbis Central
Posted
I gave out 1bn today to people 😘