Jump to content

J Kell

Members
  • Posts

    316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by J Kell

  1. 1 minute ago, Epi said:

    Now you dudes should 'Recognize hostilities' lol, then it's a defensive war ?

    OH NO!  An alliance that is literally so unattractive they have to try to steal players from alliances because new players know they suck.  HOW COULD THEY ATTACK US?!?!?  Will our allies back us up?!?!?!  OUR BACKS ARE TO THE WALL!

    • Like 1
  2. 42 minutes ago, Blackatron said:

    To prevent this I suggest that resistance should automatically regenerate for both nations over the course of the war, at a rate of 1 point per turn. The resistance damage of each of the attacks could correspondingly be slightly increased in order to not make wars end too slowly when one side is winning all of their attacks.

     

    I feel like not much will change with this, except the winning nation will have to have 1-2 more immense triumphs.  IMO the actual issue causing wars to end quickly tend to be because of double buying by the attackers, strategic planning with the other people in the defender's slots, and inactivity of the defender.

    All 3 of these are user-generated and are just smart ways of playing the game.  Adding resistance during a war wouldn't really change anything except make the attackers attack 1-2 more times(look at fortify and how useless that was).  

    I will say this if we were to removal double buying capabilities and then add this mechanic that could be interesting.  There would still be some questions that would need to be answered, but that seems more of a reasonable answer to make wars more competitive than just forcing the losing nation to take more hits.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  3. I would like to remind everyone that this is a game and that pixel huggers are the most pathetic breed of humans in this game.  

    The principle of the thing is; everyone would have been rolled and the winning side feels like the losers should force the VMers to have the same damage as the rest of the alliance.

     

    Why are we still discussing this?  How petty are people over pixels?

    • Upvote 3
  4. On 12/3/2018 at 1:06 PM, ☠ϟħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™☠ said:

    Buy me city 24 and I'll buy up nukes and nuke 'em post-war.

    Shifty is a butcher for sale.

    Also my boi Leo/Thanos dropping truth bombs like a B-52 over 'Nam.

    The losers are losers and have zero say. Drive the knife in deep and twist. TKR sphere deserves this.

    "Omg but you're making this CN 2.0." "Omg, you're making bad enemies and bad blood."

    TKR needed their ego and teeth kicked in.

    Guardian is smug, but they ain't that bad. (Exception)

    TCW, who cares about pissing them off? They can't fight their way out of a paper bag.

    GoB had it coming.

    Tesla is basically dead and proved to be a useless offshoot of The Chola/Zodiac.

    Statesmen, Nova Riata, Silenzio, and any other micros are irrelevant and should just be tossed to the raiders anyway.

    Idk who the frick came up with this idea that this game doesn't need drama. Your stagnant shit filled minds keep coming up with ideas on how to kill any fun and conflict. Y'all rather have passive aggressive, "listen here pal" wars that end in nothing instead of salt filled, humiliating, and punishing defeats. The weak should fear the strong. 

    Shifty says what's on everyone's mind, but they're too afraid to say it because they're playing model UN.

    Prove me wrong

    Protip: You can't.

    *bump*, this needs to read by everyone again.

    • Upvote 2
  5. 2 hours ago, Agent W said:

    Everyone in EMC is so goddamn soft. I guess that’s what years of winning easy wars do to you.

    I remember days of old when winning a war meant something, as the victors put their jackboots on the neck of their fallen enemies. It’s a damn shame Pacifica doesn’t repeat the actions their forebears once took upon enemies.

     

    You mean have winning the war actually mean something? 

    HnXarCG.gif?noredirect

     

    THAT'S NOT PC!!!!! EVERYONE SHOULD WIN SOMETHING AFTER EVERY WAR!

    0miaJkb.png

    • Upvote 1
  6. Creed, I've seen ya around these forums and I always liked your posts...  Even if they were only a few...

     

    This is a very dark turn that Orbis has gone...  The timing couldn't have been worse with the war going on, I fear that the divisiveness of the war won't allow the community to come together and find these people.  Someone reading this post knows exactly who it was... 

    AND TO THE SCUMBAGS WHO THREATEN THESE FINE INDIVIDUALS

    tenor.gif?itemid=5593626

  7. 11 hours ago, Rosey Song said:

    Kid, you're clearly too young for this game, so why don't you go right on ahead, delete your nation and crack the colouring books back out for yourself.  Let someone who got the reference respond.

    Guess playing this game for 3 1/2 years and being a 4.0 GPA as an upperclassman in college means I get hit with playground insults.  We have truly evolved here on Orbis XD.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.