Jump to content

ArcKnox

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    626

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Posts posted by ArcKnox

    Mission Accomplished

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Karl VII said:

    How has that anything to do with what I said? Work on your reading comprehension seriously

    Since you are a brainlet I will explain it in fine detail

    I am calling you a hypocrite for continuing to fight people who were trying to surrender because your leadership wanted to get as many of our players to delete or go inactive as possible. This is you kicking people when they are down. I hope I cleared up your misunderstanding.

    • Upvote 1

    Orbis Fustercluck, 2020.

    in Orbis Central

    Posted

    8 minutes ago, Duke Arthur said:

    Just because a middle exist doesnt mean a good decision was made. More fair would have been: this is as of this moment not okay, stop this. The result of this is that not only gwcp is affected but also allies of NPO, hundreds of players.

    @Alex didnt respond to my earlier question but thanks OP for providing it, Coal A member(s) were brought in to decide the fate of their ingame enemies. Thats a bad call right there. Its malice to throw a word at it. 

    Coal B has been forced out by admin. The results of coming back on an earlier agreement by Alex or atleast willfully allowing something to excist for months then suddenly stop it.

    You're exceedingly ignorant of anything you're not told to repeat. Pre was in "coalition a" (yarr didn't really want anything to do with us so that's dubious) for like 2 rounds before getting peace. If you think he's on our side because he recognized NPO's blatant cheating you're even more delusional than you let on.

    A Camelot Post

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    11 hours ago, Tapatios said:

    I am stating that you are a shitbag Cheat0r, I do not need to hand proofs that you will deny, in your own dark soul you know you are. It is your broken Morals and lack of Ethics what makes you deny the truth.

    So, Okay Boomer.

    Okay zoomer

    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    Orbis Fustercluck, 2020.

    in Orbis Central

    Posted

    >There's been a lot of talk on both sides about how the action taken was too much, while the other side has said that there was not enough action. That's an indicator of a solid compromise, a reasonable middle.

    People on one side are outraged that after being held at war with every dirty trick in the book (culminating in the revelation that it was funded by wholesale cheating) being used to beat them down until they delete/disband/pay exorbitant sums of money, the perpetrators (except one) are now unable to play the game for about as long as they have. People on the other side are indignant that Sheepy dared to touch them.

    One side refused any peace but total and complete victory. The other has been trying to surrender for months, and granted white peace immediately.

    Please don't compare the toxicity of "our" side to theirs.

    • Like 4
    • Upvote 7

    Mission Accomplished

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Karl VII said:

    Kicking someone who's already down just makes you a real class act Sketchy.

     

    One last time, just for you

    On 12/6/2019 at 3:01 PM, ArcKnox said:

    Part the Second: Disband your alliances and merge them into Fark

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:25:08 PM
    knightfall wasn't actually about a tkr grudge for me, it was about getting a shot at those whales we never got in other wars

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:25:10 PM
    lol

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:25:13 PM
    some of them were in tkr yeah

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:25:18 PM
    but getting drop guardian/gob

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:25:22 PM
    is the real sweetener

    Roquentin10/24/2019, 1:26:07 PM
    and it worked well on tkr because a lot of their whales quit

    ###

    underlordgc10/24/2019, 12:29:56 PM
    I think ketog needs to be removed from the game during this war

    underlordgc10/24/2019, 12:30:05 PM
    As an entity

    ###

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:28:48 AM
    lol @Leo the Great TKR has 15 purple diamonds on their AA

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:29:11 AM
    actually no 18 purple diamonds

    Sphinx10/16/2019, 8:45:59 AM
    Not good enough, lets get those numbers up.

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:46:26 AM
    yea

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:46:33 AM
    I'd like about 35-40 in purple diamond soon

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:46:39 AM
    with the piggies reinforcing on the low tier

    Keshav10/16/2019, 8:46:43 AM
    Ican see those being peeled away tbh

    ###

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 9:59:43 AM
    Se need to make as many of their members quit as possible

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 9:59:55 AM
    T$ has surrounded themselves with bad alliances

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 10:00:23 AM
    So we need to break their backs

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 10:00:43 AM
    Since next war we are fighting all these alliances from the beginning

    underlordgc10/2/2019, 10:02:20 AM
    You want these people to quit the game? BK man bad

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 10:05:14 AM
    Pretty sure that’s been established

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 10:05:42 AM
    And they don’t need to quit the game

    Leo the Great10/2/2019, 10:05:50 AM
    Joining fark is close enough

    underlordgc10/2/2019, 10:22:08 AM
    Oof

    ###

    QueenPhoenixLTS10/25/2019, 9:22:19 AM
    I just thought the morale blow to KERCHTOGG once t$ gets not unreasonable terms (and surrenders) would be worth the trade off.
     
    Leo the Great10/25/2019, 9:25:03 AM
    We need their members to quit to
     
    Leo the Great10/25/2019, 9:25:18 AM
    Letting them off easy makes them stronger for the next war
     
    QueenPhoenixLTS10/25/2019, 9:43:49 AM
    Up to you I guess.
     
    QueenPhoenixLTS10/25/2019, 9:44:06 AM
    Having members quit being a war goal is pretty dark, but it will no doubt be beneficial to us.

    ###

    Keshav11/3/2019, 1:02:51 AM
    no, this is a zero sum game
     
    Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:09 AM
    and in 10 years I don't want to be like  I had that opportunity to kil lthem, andd I didnt hoping they'd be "nice" to us
     
    Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:11 AM
    frick that shit.
     
    Keshav11/3/2019, 1:03:24 AM
    What benefits the enemy, harms you; and what benefits you, harm the enemy.
     
    ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:03:34 AM
    I don’t really think we’re being nice
     
    ₲ɆØⱤ₲Ɇ11/3/2019, 1:03:43 AM
    Lol that’s a bit of a overstatement
     
    Keshav11/3/2019, 1:04:17 AM
    I'm in it to ensure they are fricked enough to not be a threat in a few months time.

    ###

    Roquentin10/21/2019, 10:27:09 PM
    like everyone didn't expect this to hapen
     
    Roquentin10/21/2019, 10:27:20 PM
    this has been 3.5 years in the making where we have this type of leverage
     
    Roquentin10/21/2019, 10:27:52 PM
    and it's time to fricking to take out the trash

    ###

    leak_81_talks_about_tgh_part_1.png
    leak_82_talks_about_tgh_part_2.png

     

    But I guess dragging a war out for months doesn't count, does it? Take your crocodile tears somewhere else.

    • Upvote 3

    Additional Ground Attack Types

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    > As others outlined extensively in the thread I linked, "balancing" planes by nerfing them would unbalance the game by neutering nations' (and alliances') ability to effectively updeclare. The nominally unbalanced role of aircraft isn't a good enough reason to nerf updeclares. That line of thinking is analogous to demands to make the game more "realistic": where that complaint fails to understand that the game isn't meant to be a realistic simulation, the "planes are overpowered" complaint fails to understand the importance, if not outright primacy, of group play compared to individual play.

    Your complaints of harder updeclares ring hollow when you consider that hitting up may be difficult, but hitting down is impossible due to the very restrictive nature of downdeclare ranges. Combine this with the fact that nations that lose military units naturally drop in score makes life even more difficult for someone who should ostensibly be rewarded for making the investment in their nation. The top heavy group is at a severe disadvantage because the bottom heavy group can pick the time and place of the engagement, strike with impunity, and then hold them down indefinitely because of the glacial pace at which planes (the only unit that matters) are built. The top heavy group may win an individual battle, but their opponents are then dropped down below their range and are able to rebuild in peace for another round. This group is afforded very little opportunity for group play because they are perpetually on the defensive. Giving ground forces the ability to destroy planes would add another dimension and tactical depth to a currently 1 dimensional affair.

    Additional Ground Attack Types

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by ArcKnox

    I find it amusing that you see giving viability to ground units as unbalanced, while the current meta of only planes matter perfectly fine.

    >Downvotes

    Popular mechanics are not always good mechanics. The reverse also holds true.

    • Upvote 3
    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    Additional Ground Attack Types

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by ArcKnox

    Split ground attack types similar to airstrikes.

    1. Assault Enemy Positions

    Would be the dogfight analogue. Either nerf all other types or give this one a bonus to fighting ground forces.

    2. Scorched Earth Tactics

    Does more infra damage than all other types. Maybe buff improvement destruction chance so it's comparable to naval attacking.

    3. Loot

    Steal cash as ground attacks do currently. Remove stealing cash from all other types.

    4. Raid Enemy Airfields

    Ground analogue of target x airstrike. Would destroy enemy planes on the ground.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 12

    [Treaty] Hannibal's Purple Pachyderms

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    11 hours ago, Mr. Goober said:

    Just a few months ago, Sphinx was making offshores that had the description stating that Carthage "doesn't burn in a day". Sphinx rly wanted Carthago rolled. Now they are friendy-friends!

    Oh how memories are short. ??

    Roq holds enough grudges for the rest of the game combined.

    • Upvote 2

    Change/Remove Baseball

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    The basic principle of this game is that, aside from a basic activity requirement, clicking buttons does not provide any additional mechanical benefit. Money, resources, and military action points are generated in this game at set intervals. The only way to get ahead of other players is by better planning (optimizing builds), or exploiting the community (trade speculation/arbitrage or raiding/warfare). Baseball flies in the face of every other mechanic in the game that you can just click buttons and magic money into the game.

    @Alex grow a spine and fix your game.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept