Titus

So if we keep below 3k infra it's not going to be cost-effective? I'm sticking to low 1k then. Their price is probably going to be the biggest deterrent to using them, they're so damn expensive. I imagine they'd be most useful in alliance wars where you couldn't win conventionally, so if you nuked the biggest opposing players they'd have a hard time coming back at you.

That is a good idea, it circumvents the infra problem.

I think is very true, we have an obsession with sensationalist news

Democracy sucks because it's slow and has humans at the centre of it, the concept though is rather sound.

This though. Although I do hope you're not saying that Islam is the reason that people do this?

They will continue to be a problem whilst the West intervenes and the countries are too weak to defend themselves internally. Gotta ask yourself though which is worse, constant Western intervention for the foreseeable future or a weak Arab stat being run by terrorists. Although I would agree the ISIS is the biggest concern at the moment.

I'm guessing you're all in America given none of you brought up the recent censorship in the UK. Recently the regulatory body for film making in the UK has censored the production of porn, pretty sure that'll get censored videos of people getting frisky. The things they've censored however are sexist, they're things that traditionally women take more pleasure from. Censorship becomes a way of holding people down if you don't let them express themselves, and it can be quite easy to say someone elses views are harmful and wrong.

It really wouldn't surprise me if it just came out with random words regardless of your selections.

That's a brilliant idea, we should just make a gas cartel!

You are a: Socialist Authoritarian Multilateralist Humanist Moderate Collectivism score: 67% Authoritarianism score: 50% Internationalism score: 67% Tribalism score: -67% Liberalism score: 0% Does anyone actually know what that means? Other than the fact that I'm amazing.

I quite like this idea, as was said it adds more depth and accuracy.

Why would a privately run prison pay money to spend money on looking after a prisoner.

The prison sentences are decided by the courts, not the prisons.

The difference is that you were initially talking about individual people paying the police, I'm saying that it's up to the political infrastructure to contract them.

Except that there are private prisons. the American Correction Corporation in the US and G4S in the UK.