Jump to content

Spukey

Members
  • Posts

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Spukey

  1. On 4/6/2021 at 9:48 AM, JadenStar10 said:

    an

    Do the grawlixes start with a sound in which the upper vocal tract's shape is changed?
     

    Welcome back to Orbis and the forums, play (relatively) nice and all will be well (up until war is declared for some inane reason that is just to hide that we all just like to burn each other's nations)

  2. Aw, I'm on there! :D You recognize me, Zephyr?

    2 hours ago, zigbigadorlou said:

    Yeah, so the people at the bottom of the list are people that post a lot but only get upvoted occasionally. I suspect if downvotes were counted, the list would look much different. That is, it could differentiate the boring posters from the controversial posters. 

    Am I the former or the latter? 🤔

  3. On 3/17/2021 at 2:52 AM, Firwof Kromwell said:

    This is just another forum post of Quack just trying to grasp needily for unnecessary attention. This is due to most there higher-ups thinking they're better & more deserving than almost everyone else. I have a feeling this goes in correlation with being rolled last global and some people are still pissy about it. So pissy, that you got to prove that you're still better in ways that make y'all feel you're making up for your losses. Even if it just makes you look worse. 

    I understand that it's usually the winners write history. That's also a messed up and corrupt thing to do as well way to think. Seems like you guys are doing this because you're seething on being sore loser's from last global humiliating how most of Quack used to always win, no surrender. Y'all feel it's necessary to take it out on others so you guys can cope. There are a lot more healthier ways to cope & learn then verbally harassing, even flailing on people in-game/Discord.

    Instead of pulling a uncontrolled rage Hulk from before Endgame, one's got to learn how to put the brains & brawns together fairly to move forward positivitely in life(Literally and figuratively). Also, always letting the winner write history & teaching people from the winner isn't always the way to go. There's actually a lot of what we learned in school that's actually twisted truths because of this. 

     

     

     

    I've honestly even looked more into these(more than the ones presented). We all were taught what we were given to safeguard us from the darker history so we would have historical figures to look up to as great examples for what to be. People we can look back into history in order for positive empowerment.  Essentially, the flaws that the winning/elite side in the past usually hides the even the most gruesome truths just to install positive empowerment for future generations to look back at. Like the old saying, history will continue repeating itself until we embrace the past, understand it, learn from it, and cope with it, then teach it going forward so we learn from mistakes, not hide/censor them.

     

     

     

    Is this a joke

    On 3/17/2021 at 11:08 AM, Aiya said:

    Is this because noone cared about your RoH with CC? Sorry hun, your alliance just wasn't important.

    Play nice, Aiya.

    • Downvote 1
  4. 5 hours ago, Deulos said:

    Never start a sentence with "but", use a comma after your first sentence to create a compound sentence. It should be "I hate to break the news to you, BUT recognition of hostility does make it a war. "

     

    Oh no, he's bringing down the whole castle.

    1 minute ago, Firwof Kromwell said:

    Yes, but does everything you do always have to be proving that your superior than others?

    Oh god, it's turning into an IM argument. (This is a joke about how quickly Firwof replied to Lossi)

  5. 43 minutes ago, Mutsu said:

    None has finally risen from the depths, it won't be too long until they declare war on every bloc.

     

    In that case, we are screwed. GG time to permaVM 

    We'll be fine, they have terrible tiering and most of their members are inactive, discoordinated and they have no concept of OPSEC

  6. 3 minutes ago, JadenStar10 said:

    Lmao no.

    If we follow European Feudalism, a king can have Archdukes under him, and a king is of a higher ranking than an Archduke. 

    Though De Facto the Grand Duke of Lithuania or the Archduke of Austria were treated on the same level as kings, this was not the case for all Archdukes and Grand Dukes.

    Please do not confuse De Facto, and De Jure.

    Arch Dukes are de jure under Emperors and Kings, but above Grand Dukes, and Dukes.

    @Nukey6 @Ragnarok8085

    Huh, I didn't know you knew about European history, Jaden. noted

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.