Jump to content

Pascal

Members
  • Posts

    299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Pascal

  1. I like how you (HWR$) all make it look like Clock is the big bad guy making it look like a big deal, when the last time a Clock representative spoke in this thread was 3 days ago. We know you love us, HW & Ro$e, and that this move is 100% "because" of us .. but you could at least nuance your words, I wouldn't exactly be proud of myself and actively "troll" Clock when I signed a - I'll be careful - temporary MDP de facto creating a temporary hegemony just to allegedly stop us.

    Also, I find it curious that some of you used the word "pragmatism" to refer to this move. I wouldn't exactly define a move that shows you in shameful way and gets the entire game angry for legitimate reasons as "pragmatic", but you do you. I know you guys only sees Clock because we have a few whales, but the rest of the game exists too, and yes, they disagree with your move. You're not going to convince anyone else of the opposite ..

    (and props to HW members downvoting their own post in the past few days after the storm to allegedly discredit the other 130 downvotes, that's some honourable sacrifice)

    • Upvote 3
  2. 6 minutes ago, Charles Bolivar said:

    Ironic to criticise others for promoting self-interest whilst simultaneously promoting a vision for the game which happens to promote one's own self-interest.

    This game is governed by self-interest. Always has and always will be.

    When your self-interests lead back to bipolarity, or even one would argue, to the formation of an hegemony whenever it suits them de facto killing the game, I think you should start putting yourself back in question.

    • Upvote 2
  3. 19 minutes ago, Agent W said:

    What we have now is tripolarity. You very well know that had things remained the same, Rose/BW would have been the 3rd and 4th most powerful spheres to Clock/HW. I understand that you're mad that this move makes your job harder, but spare me the moral grandstanding.

    Yes, yes. Because 2 spheres holding 65-70% of the c30s+ in the game is not bipolarity.

    Tripolarity ? You're just trying to consolidate the upper tier to make yourself unkillable in that tier. As if Clock could stand any chance to beat Ro$e or HW at c30+ by being outnumbered over 2:1 by Ro$e or outtiered by HW, so spare me your moral grandstanding.

    26 minutes ago, Hwan said:

    Of course, it's only a multipolar world if GOB is by far the strongest sphere, right?

    I see you as the kind of guy who tries to fight fire with fire.

    • Upvote 6
  4. 8 hours ago, MBaku said:

    If you reduce city score the effect will be to make down decs easier, and without a hard bottom the effect will be literally the opposite of "help[ing] to create less down declare huge gaps." 

    Am I missing something? 

    Score from military units deeply needs to be increased (something similar to the old score meta) to counter-balance it at the same time and punish idiots sitting on max military for no reason. But I guess that Alex, Prefontaine and the rest of the community will need a war to realize their mistake, as usual.

    It's the entire score formula that needs to be reworked, not just city score. 

  5. 1 hour ago, HeroofTime55 said:

    I dunno, in this world, it's a good question.  t$ dropped us because we refused to drop our other allies on their whim. 

    Best FA move of 2021 🙏

    1 hour ago, HeroofTime55 said:

    I guess the preference is for a world where nobody is actually loyal to anyone else or has any honor or decency?  Y'all a bunch of monkeys flinging poo, and it shows.  Just look at the utter mess that passes for a DoW posted by f***ing anybody for the past year and a half.

    You literally allied cheaters & defended them bro, despite everyone knowing for years. You used them at your advantage in wars. Alpha even literally attacked it's own sphere allies during gw16 lmao, nice "loyalty". Clearly you're the one flinging poo here.
    Are you now unironically going to use loyalty as an excuse ? Bullshit.

    Being allied to the same people for years also leads to stagnation, makes the game less dynamic and thus boring by extension. Clock is trying to change that and we attempted to launch new dynamics, but in vain it seems.

    • Upvote 2
  6. 24 minutes ago, MinesomeMC said:

    Coalition B is what we refer to as NeoIQ. 

    Coalition B isn't IQ. IQ is BK/NPO/GoG (+ GOONS which made OD later). T$ and a shitton of other alliances (way too many) were part of Coalition B but were never part of IQ. In t$'s case, it was only during like 2 weeks at very beginning of gw14.

    gw14 lasted 8 months because of IQ/OD and only IQ/OD is to blame for that, it's in no way because of Coalition B.
    At the very best, you can also blame alliances who fought for OD until the very end (Polaris, UPN, Camelot etc) which had some of their leaders (presumably people like Malal, TheNG ...) who were aware of OD plans. So tbh i'm not sure what narrative you're trying to spin here.

    Honestly, many alliances would have considered allying NPO pre-gw14 when NPO and BK ""splitted"", you can't blame t$ for doing it and ending up in that awkward situation during gw14.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.