Jump to content

Master

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    19

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Master

    [DoW] Here we go again

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by Master

    3 hours ago, Emperor Adam said:

    It's a function that completely tears apart your "lol just catch up??? Incompetent econ???" narrative.

     

    If (lets roughly estimate) 25% of the year for most aas is war, compared to roughly (generously) 10-15% for Grumpys whales.... how do you feasibly expect us to catch up? Not only do you have more revenue by means of cities, you're also interupted significantly less.

     

    The exponential cost slows you down a bit, but pretending it balances anything is below you and you're smarter than that claim.

     

    As for "always picks easy fights", you do. There isn't any difficult fight for you in orbis. Some will take a bit longer to win, but in current state Grumpy will always win. And you'll always grow exponential faster.

    Let me ask you something.

    How did KingGhost caught up?

    how did Vein,Pascal,Hughes,Neantasia,Murtaza,Vrael,Kratos ??

    they are your allys/member ,why dont you ask them?

    thats where competency comes in play

    • Upvote 1

    [DoW] Here we go again

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by Master

    am sorry didnt quite got you,

    you are refering to me being that high at 25cities sitting in your so called " safety net " right in npo's meatgrinder,

    or me "pretending that i enjoy fighting" coming out of the war with 32-33cities ?

    and make no mistake its not only me.

    I guess you guys where keeping an umbrella when it was raining whales to help you counter grumpy's dominance.

    • Upvote 3

    [DoW] Here we go again

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    44 minutes ago, Emperor Adam said:

    Is this GoBs admission that even t$, the "closest" in tiering to GoB, still can't do anything against you? Thank you for supporting our statement SRD! Can't wait to see how you resolve it.

    It all comes down to perspective my friend,

    people like you keep blaming others for their incompetence to field a strong high-tier to much grumpy's,

    while others ,walk the walk, get themselves there and join grumpy adding to the fact that you cant compete with us 

    [Sphere/DoW] We're going to hollywood

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    46 minutes ago, Utter Nutter said:

    the only sense these declarations have is that they are meant to win the war and crush your opponent. They are meant to use any excuses of fairness available to completely unfairly in reasons and numbers, blitz a weaker opponent and win while caressing your own ego thinking you are better.

    Am sorry cant focus on my ego right now,

    i have to study for MY EXAMS...

    Beige Replacement - Relief Mechanic Not Tied to Losing Wars

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    I really dont get it....

    whats the problem with having an active-reserve system in place instead of a beige-relief one ?

    its quite straightforward in my mind:

    f.e.

    x=active troops, y=reserve troops 

    the total amount of your x+y troops cannot exceed the total number that you are able to field at any given time 

    that goes the same with all mil units and your spies 

    Also Lets implement this to alliance wide wars:

    you are getting blitzed and CANT to fight back?

    you get one for the team, wait the 5days that you would need either way to build back up and then come out swinging 

    this can also give alliances a great opportunity to get back up after a losing round in a war if planned correctly 

    you are getting blitzed and YOU THINK YOU CAN fight back?

    each day you are given the opportunity to make the reserves you build each day active and use them like you do now 

     

    All in all you are going to decide how you wanna use your units and when.

    I can understand that this given ability for alliances to get back up after a losing round in a war, might destroy the incentive for the alliances that wanna initiate this said war but i dont think that this politics problem should be mingled with the war mechanincs of the game itself !!

     

     

    • Downvote 1

    [Dow] Error 404

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    35 minutes ago, Hokai said:

    Due to Error 404's actions towards us "Hizulian-Atlantis" we have decided to declare war on Error 404.

     

    Update: The alliance denies its involvement even though the governemnt has told it's members to attack Error 404. 

    You could at least sign a top-tier alliance before attacking 

    what are we supposed to do now..just watch? 

    [Bloc] Virtual Hedge Money

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    30 minutes ago, The Royalist said:

    Well I doubt they’re using money for growth plans aimed at only their gov. And I don’t really see the problem of taxing idiots and inactives, lol. It’s what alliances including KT have always done, and it has great returns. 
    TEst still has many experienced players, and new guys are being trained as we speak. They’ll continue growing and become even a better alliance than they currently are.
    So, I’m not sure what you’re mad at exactly, as I was only pointing out akuryo was wrong with his post.

    you pointed that test is ''bigger'' than 4/5 members of our bloc, whereas i see it completely differently

    anyway,  who am i to say what test is gonna do with their taxes from their idiots and inactives like you said, since these idiots (per you) have no problem with it...

    all i know is the fact that most experienced players left and quite frankly it means more than inflated ''peacetime'' numbers

    have fun...

     

    [Bloc] Virtual Hedge Money

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    1 hour ago, The Royalist said:

    TEst is bigger than 4/5 of the alliances in your bloc😛. You were also allied to them until recently. 

    You mean the same Test that has lost in the last month 5 of their most experienced players and whose only purpose of existence is to fund their gov with cities and repay their loans through tax-farming their inexperienced and inactive players ?

    Yeah you are definitely right, they have to be ''bigger'' ...

    • Haha 2

    [NPO Call to Arms]$yndicate RoH and Treaty Activation

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Malal said:

    No ceasefire was brokered, we merely stoped launching attacks temporarily out of our own generous hearts and I'm calling it a ceasefire because I'm to lazy to type all that. We were still 100% at war with these nations and informed TS of this fact on day 1 and that unless they surrendered promptly we would continue with the wars, as is our right.

    So out of your generous heart tell me:

    how much damage i must do to counterbalance my pending 2.5k infra losses ?

    cause i didnt quite got that right the first time around and i think i did a bit more than needed 

    [NPO Call to Arms]$yndicate RoH and Treaty Activation

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by Master

    8 minutes ago, Malleator said:

    1. War dodgers exist. 

    2. Coal B attacks them as all war dodgers should be. 

    3. t$ defends war dodgers, an illegitimate move in my eyes. 

    4. Coal B defends against t$ aggression and illegitimate counters. 

    5. t$ calls in allies to help defend war dodgers. 

     

    There's no feckin' way you're serious, t$. 

    They're WAR DODGERS. 

    WHAT DID YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU HARBORED THEM??? 

    Its funny how someone with 5bil net damages in this war is  conidered a war dogder...

    I was just trying to give one of your guys in the coalition the chance to finally pass a war dogder

    GUESS WHAT... its not gonna happen now 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept