The Emperor
-
Posts
161 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by The Emperor
-
-
17 hours ago, CuppyCakeYums said:
The irony in this comment is hilarious from you.
10 hours ago, Sphinx said:What about struggling large alliances, specifically around the 15th May, 2018?
I know Dusty's actions must make him a EMC hero in your guy's eyes, but what he did was fricked up(As was what you and your alliance has done). He offered help, lied, couped them and then(Perhaps it was this partner) destroyed them.. Being naive doesn't mean they deserve that...They where doing their best to try and save their alliance, and trusted the wrong person. Any sane halfway decent human would recognize that what happened was fricked up.. How do you guys not...? Are bad things only bad if they happen to you or your side? I think there is a word for people who think like you
Are you guys trying to continue to spread that BS? I had hoped we where past that, but with people like you guys, go figure hahah15 hours ago, TheRebelMan said:Not sure which is worse.
Couping a shit micro, using them as meat shields, or giving them false hope that they will succeed by protecting them, which is what you and so many other alliances do.Oh, and if that's not enough, there is what Cuppy said as well.
A lot has changed while I was out, it's been bizarre(And sad =/) seeing what a post IC TKR is like, how the treaty web has changed so drastically, and how much worse the OWF has gotten. People nowadays seem to just toss away truth and believe/support anything, no matter how bullshit it is in reality...if supports their narrative. While it has always been a thing, it's now dominant to the point where exceptions are almost unseen. It feels like the decent members of this game have all either gone silent or left, to the point where it seems the community at large sees nothing wrong with a small alliance being lied to, tricked and destroyed...
We have not done anything you have accused us of... We never couped a micro, used them as meet shields(Or even put pressure one one to enter a war), or have given them false hope(Whether they meet their goals is largely an unknown, though we do our best to help them get there). Making a habit of BSing like you to so you can shit talk(Does it make you feel strong or something?) is poor form, and just bad for the game.
I think making an appeal to morality on the PnW OWF would be a waste of my time, but perhaps some of you can be reasoned with. While shit talking and enjoying the misfortunes of weak alliances/people who have done little to deserve it may feel good to a lot of people here, you are creating(Have created really) a shit post truth world in this game where all there is the most stupid of shit talk. It creates a toxic environment that ruins the game in many ways. Politics with people who are so warped that they cant understand anything that isn't in their favor isn't fun, conversing with a community that shit talks so much for the stupidest reasons isn't fun, dealing with people who have no principal or self awareness is not fun. I think if we continue this way, the game will go the way of CN and die. I have seen many talented, competent, morally straight people turned off to this game because of this crap. I'm sure a lot of the people here enjoy hearing that, I just hope it isn't a majority
Do better.
-
4
-
2
-
9
-
-
2 hours ago, DustyDart said:
Uhh, so first ever forums post cuase well, why the hell not for this s***
So I've never been a member of Sirius, but due to it's new virgin of a leader, Robert Gero, and his lack luster performance, I was able to talk my way to gov, and well alliance collapsed but had a world of a time the short while I was there, but anyways kinda sad the low governed removed everyone and Sirius will be going into The Federation
Was fun for the time, time to missuse some hard earned alliance cash, that I got full control of in like 13 mins, that how long it took me, a non-sirius member to walk in, I was intending to build and fix the shit Robert ****ed but eh
So o7 Sirius
Getting a brand new leader of a struggling small alliance to trust you and then blowing the alliance up and robing them is fricking pathetic. Jesus christ you are a piece of shit
-
3
-
14
-
-
2 hours ago, Zephyr said:
You should be careful not to make an enemy of Grigor, as he aptly notes on his nation's profile he is single-handedly responsible for the complete destruction of Nova Riata, The Commonwealth and The Dixie Union.
LOL!
-
1
-
1
-
-
ALLIANCE CATEGORIES
Alliance of the Year: The Syndicate(Came out of retirement!)
Most Powerful Alliance: BK probs
Best Military: The Syndicate(Mad props on them for not feeling the need to brag about it, but they where an absolute powerhouse in 2016 and still have it out of retirement)
Best Rookie Alliance: Typhon
Best Flag: House Stark(Ned was my favorite character in GoT ha)
Best Diplomatic Team: Not sure
Best Economic System: The Syndicate
Best Recruiting Staff: Pantheon
Best Propaganda Staff: Acadia(NG)
Best Alliance Growth: Pantheon
Alliance Most Likely to Succeed in 2019: That's hard to say
Most Immoral Alliance: TCW
PLAYER CATEGORIES
Player of the Year: Partisan
Most Powerful Player: Roq or Thanos probably
Best Alliance Leader: Hard to say
Most Dynamic Player: Dynamic
COMMUNITY CATEGORIES
Most Missed Player (Player that has gone inactive/quit): Partisan
WORST CATEGORIES
Worst Alliance of the Year: Maybe TFP, one should always fight for your allies
Worst Military of the Year: TCW I guess
Worst Diplomatic Move: Hard to pick, there's too many to choose
Most Inactive Large Alliance: Maybe guardian atm with their 20% inactivity
Alliance Most Likely to Fail in 2019: Who knows
Worst Alliance Leader of the Year: Felky.
Alliance Most Likely to get Rolled in 2019: Everyone hahah.
-
Typhon is a well run alliance, high taxes are often a benefit to everyone inside, especially if they are saving up cash for a post war rebuild. It's really quite normal, nearly all alliances go through high tax periods. The few that dont get ruined in a war
-
4
-
7
-
-
Congrats Kayser, I'm glad fate has conspired to have us working together again!
-
2 hours ago, The Mad Titan said:
I am going to keep beating the dead horse of the goals being not contradictory. SOME of the alliances care about damaging everyone equally, SOME want to show that war can not be escaped. Both these goals are served by the term presented.
The dichotomy of these goals is irrelevant in the nature of demanding them sell to 1k. All of the diverse coalitions' goals are served by that whether it be due to pragmatism or precedent setting (which has already been set by Guardian and TKR before).
It's a shame she struggles so greatly understanding such basic and plain concepts.
3 hours ago, Nizam Adrienne said:I believe I've already answered this question but if I was unclear, allow me to clarify. The issue isn't to do with money or pride. The issue is you're presenting two contradictory goals. Either you care about addressing war dodging culture and want to accept our offer to help you actually deal with legitimate war dodgers or you just want to damage everyone equally and you don't care whether they're real war dodgers or not. We can work with either one but those two goals, as represented by the term, don't work together and I'm not okay with letting you set a false precedent for war dodgers. By trying to push both goals, that's what this is turning into.
Shamelessly attempting to grandstand using such nonsense is unbecoming of your station.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
You are one of the few people in this game I can actually call a true friend, best of luck out their bud, I know I'm going to miss you
-
1 hour ago, ☠ϟħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™☠ said:
Will Pantheon ever learn?
This is Shifty, Rambling on, over the hills and far away, in the houses of the holy.
It's doctored, it never happened XD
Shifty!!!-
1
-
-
F
I think i had the record of the largest deleted nation for some time, well played Mr. Warpools
-
3 hours ago, Valkorion Baratheon said:
Only the Arch supporters understand true art. Samwise had the most visually appealing pumpkin, yes. However, that pumpkin does not reflect any inner meaning. There is no message to be left behind. The great artists of the past and even present often leave behind a revealing message about something important such as society, war, inequality, etc.
Arch is sending a message here. He is expressing his grief over the lack of dynamic gameplay due to the ruling party, TKR. The jagged lines reveal the lack of hand-control of a man without power in an oppressive world. The lack of effort shows the loss of energy as the top feeds off the labor of the bottom. However, his words, "TKR Sucks," are fighting words. This symbolizes the fight left in the peasant. They signify that the revolution is coming. Nay, that the revolution has come!
Happy Halloween! Good luck on the battlefield! Blood for the Blood God!
Hah!!
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, ✯Rainbow✯ said:Nice Craved Pumpkin!
I enjoyed to see many craved pumpkins but Arch's.
It is not good looking, Arch. I do have nothing against this; however, you need to think positively during Autumn Fest (Halloween) for honoring others in whatever they are or wherever they are from. They did their best for craved pumpkin as you did this.
I wish you guys who craved pumpkin good luck!
Respectfully,
Rainbow of Color
How's the beach party going rainbow? Nice to see you can spare some time between the volleyball and beer-pong for us non-WMers! Can you say "Hi" to Sargun and Mitsuru for me?!
-
1
-
6
-
Lol! Awesome XD
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Sean Anthony said:
Alright so, I know I've screwed up the last few alliances I have founded and with the Crimson Entente one is such biased from what others told me its not even funny. However, I agree that I've made mistakes in being leader. I am now in Camelot as Lord of Finance (High Gov). I am here to create new friends and to learn more leadership. I am currently working on learning more about leadership and working with others etc... Very few people have asked me 'the question', "Why do you keep creating alliances if they keep failing?". The answer to that is because I don't really ever want to give up and creating an alliance is a thrill and a roller coaster. It sparks adventure and into a new part of Orbis and you can create it how you want and see fit. I can't say I won't create another alliance again cause I know if I'd say that i'd be lying to everyone and to myself. I'd create another one when the time is right and when I've fully learned how to be a proper leader. But anyways, if you have any questions or anything just respond and I'll reply!
"The best form of revenge is success" & "TKR sucks (clickbait)"This is a game, do whatever you enjoy, dont let the haters get you down! I remember the thrill of making my alliance all those years ago, it's fun, if you ever want some tips I'll be happy to help you out as much as I can
-
1
-
-
Just now, Senpai said:
Stay where you belong... in my memories.
LOL!
Though tbh, I cant wait ahahah -
Sephiroth my old friend, you where too late, I am but a tool for his inevitable ascension now, heretics will be burned without mercy in His name
-
4 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:
You could always change sides and hit NPO instead........ Just a thought..........
-
2
-
-
17 hours ago, Jan Orwell said:
Happy to be back around! Thanks for your explanation, it definitely makes sense.
On the other hand, I think that @Leftbehind has a strong point as well. I really think that this whole war against much weaker opponents create a lot of negative publicity for Pantheon - not because it is immoral, simply because it looks like Pantheon cannot fight alliances in its score range and has to take an easy (by easy I mean very very easy) win. Then there is another question: does Pantheon's image and reputation matter that much for Pantheon's leadership? Pantheon is not a pariah, it has relatively strong ties to other alliances and its reputation does not influence how many new members they are getting (they still have a lot of them). Therefore, I think Pantheon got some negative reputation, but they do not really have to care about it that much.
Most people will think whatever they want to think really, but to claim that this makes us look like we cannot fight alliances in our score range is a conclusion only a biased mind can reach. What it shows is that we can take down some micros easy(Woopty fricking do), but says nothing about our ability to fight larger alliances. I do however think one takeaway for us is that we have developed the spreadsheet technology(Credit to Batavia and tcase) and have an active member base that will give one hell of a blitz though, but sense we didn't get to use it in a meaningful way, we really will have to wait until next war to put ourselves to the test I fear =/-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Mitsuru said:
I think it's rather amusing when someone like you goes out of his way to imply that others are wicked.
I seem to recall that you took no measures against your former government members who immediately tried to trashed Yui (Remember how that went for you?) shortly after taking over Pantheon.
I also recall how you approached your allies The Syndicate and Dark Brotherhood to tell them I threatened you after I told you not to ignore my messages after refusing to repay your debts to TKR for months.
And I also recall how you then went on to tell your allies that I spied on your nation and killed spies without providing any evidence whatsoever for this kind of claim. Just to smear me and especially TKR in front of your two closest allies. Lying to them like that. Ts ts ts.
So tell me about wicked, honey.
Talking shit while in VM? Ofcourse you are ha
Have you seen the buroham SS's where Yui is there with Cakey and Felky when they pressure Sphinx to blow up our discord? XD Her hands arnt clean. You also don't know shit about how I handled my gov back then, everything you're saying is such nonsense XD But I suppose that's why we love you ha
I said with how the spying started 2 hours after your immature, and out-of-line outbursts, the likely-hood of it being you or someone you knew from your sphere was likely. You smear yourself Mitsuru, I really didn't have to do anything ha. But by all means keep blaming me for your frickups, I truly don't mind hahaha
-
4 hours ago, Leftbehind said:
Didn't you spend time in TKR before returning to play savior? So I'm unsure how you can try and take the moral high ground when you are just as guilty.
The events I refer to happened during my leaving and or after I left, you know this XD . TKR lying about their commitment to "Dynamism" was going on while I was there though, but High princes where not informed of it and I believed them, I didn't find out about the treaties until after I left
-
3
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, Jan Orwell said:
Yes, yes, I know that it is done by Grumpy and Guardian, however Pantheon started the strike on Nova Riata and Statesmen first and these alliances are in the TKR sphere. You could expect some kind of retaliation on your top tier (regardless of the fact whether it was done by Guardian or whomever else) as it is almost impossible for Pantheon to defend its top tier.
Well, I remember quite well that there were a lot of effort in Pantheon to defend your whales and it seems to me that they were now sacrificed for some easy kills and negative reputation after your attacks on Nova Riata and Statesmen.
7 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:For the record if pantheon stayed out, we wouldn’t have attacked them. My goal is to try to win, and part of that is not wasting resources on non combatants. Just ask Rose’s protectorate Yarr, they are in our wheel house, but as long as they stay out, I am not going to hit them.
I try to stay away from the practice of crushing non combatants because it’s easy, and you can get away with it.
Oh hey Jan! I hope all is well with you, it's good to see you around again!
It's a bit of an awkward situation where Pantheon was in the coalition sense the start, and when the math was done it made the most sense for us to counter some of the people who we thought would certainly join on TCW's side, and we had all of our guys ready to drop in on the time of the blitz and the following days. After it became unlikely that there would be those additions, we were to slowly start reinforcing other fronts, us hitting those prots only speed up grumpies attacks on us by 2 days or so.
Grumpy certainly wrecked our shit up top, you guys have been performing well this war working in tandem with guardian, I personally dont fault you guys at all and think you are playing a very pragmatic/solid game.
As for the morality of hitting prots, given their sides penchant for lopsided wars, using prots as combatants, and their dubious at best morality, I think in this situation it was morally straight. The discord drama and them constantly threatening our prots certainly played a role in how we did things as well-
8
-
4
-
-
8 minutes ago, Zary said:
To Nova Riata and Statesmen, big up for not just bending over and letting them have it. Gotta give some serious credit for that. But intentionally being demilitarized and unprepared? That's just dumb. I understand not wanting to make yourself out to be a threat, but with open targets amongst the combatants running low in a +2-1 war, you had to imagine the war boners were pointing in your direction.
I think their talk for putting up a fight is just talk(It makes for a nice OWF post though, have to admit), they sold or suicided away most of their mill day 1 and then tried to scare our prots with their new 'low score strat'
28 minutes ago, Spaceman Thrax said:Best of luck to Statesmen and Nova Riata. There's worse things than a bit of lost infra.
I guess Pantheon is making some kind of political statement about how you shouldn't linger in protectorate status while looking to TKR for protection. Probably trying to save you from ending up like an alliance that would pull a punkass move like hitting a bunch of protectorates to try and look like you're contributing to a global war effort, in the future.
Forgive me if I am wrong in interpreting this as a jab at us, We didn't attack them to try and look good or try and look like we where doing a contribution XD I believe that's called a strawman argument, where you make up your opponents stance and then attack the stance that you made up to make to try and win an argument against them XD It's a solid tactic that works on a lot of people though embarrassingly enough, but it wont go far here
As for NR, you are allied to people that seem to pride themselves in lopsided wars, if this is truly an issue for you and you find injustice in acts such as this, you may want to have some consistency and rethink who you associate with-
7
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
23 minutes ago, Mad Max said:This is the only list that was leaked to me
I shared that with you in confidence, I am never trusting you again. You still coming over tonight for netflix and chill though right bae?In all seriousness though, there were looking to be more entries to this war on the other side and GF quickly volunteered to be on the first wave with us on fronts and arnt the cowards the slot filled TKR may make them seem to some, I think they are learning about OWF expectations and etiquette though.. But I would encourage everyone to cut them some slack, and for Godfury to learn a bit about OWF customs from this, it's not so cut and dry unfortunately
-
9
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
55 minutes ago, Lordship said:No quarter for the wicked
Last I saw, BK hasn't stolen any banks, put bank thieves in gov positions, protected bank thieves, had members uses banks stolen by exploits for personal banks, had members then talked shit about it, and Im pretty sure BK didn't lie to the game about wanting to make it more dynamic all the while holding secret treaties that would give your side incredible NS.
*gasp*
Whew that took a while to type ha
Can you in good faith call someone else wicked with your alliance's and allies actions? I dare say not-
1
-
20
The couping of Sirius
in Alliance Affairs
Posted · Edited by The God Emperor of Mankind
The Emperor!
So you are saying you didn't lie to them, trick them, and coup them? I talked with them, even their "Last semi decent president"(Fabrezzy was awesome, I really liked working with him), but I will hear you out and look at your SS's if you send them to me. But given how you have admitted to it yourself... you may find it an uphill battle
Edit: Though if you are going to lie about something, I suggest you be a little more careful next time(Or learn not to be a shit person, I would suggest that one personally) https://imgur.com/edit?deletehash=Dw9aGgp24A20Ix4&album_id=oBYeUeg