Doughnuts
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Doughnuts
-
-
18 hours ago, MonkeyDLegend said:
50% of orbis be like:
50% be like:
MDL be like:
Seems your math's might be a little off, 50% agrees, 50% does not understand that's 100% of Orbis, where does MDL come in ?
-
10 hours ago, Fraggle said:
From The Desk of Uncle Traveling Matt
Leader of Fraggle Rock
Greetings to the most handsome nations of Orbis. And a hearty hat tip to the average folks. The Most Mighty Nation of Fraggle Rock has run into a minor accounting error and is cash strapped. So in our infinite wisdom, we have decided to auction off the naming rights to Fraggle Rock Nuclear Weapon Number 420. This is one special nuclear weapon. We have many bids so far and decided to to make it public and open it up to others.
Feel free to bid......bidding will close in five days. All bids most be one million more than the last. Have fun!!!
The current bid is 35 million from El Commander.
Let the bidding continue!!
Many Hugs,
Uncle Traveling Matt
As you are on 410 and fired 60, that mean you are on number 470, sure your current stock pile is 410 but you are selling the naming right to weapon 420 that you pasted some what 50 nukes ago.
-
have fun all
-
50 minutes ago, Darth Revan said:
Quality>quantity any day.
I agree with you, Quality over Quantity any day, I guess HS has quantity, you proved in the last war you have anything but Quality
-
This will never happen, some people sign with loads of alliances in order to protect their own pixel's, to get to a point where they will never lose a war, i wish paperless treaties also was not a thing.
-
4 hours ago, The God Emperor of Mankind said:
The Knights Radiant bought Pantheon
So how much did The Knights Radiant pay?
-
1
-
-
Sometimes you just need great friends
-
12 minutes ago, OsRavan said:
Haha fair enough. I suspect they will be disappointed by the quality of the loot.
That they just might lol
-
On 22/04/2018 at 12:01 PM, OsRavan said:
Cata is correct.
::amused:: I also note the Imperium of Man alliance has entered the fray and started attacking us. We were doing so 'horribly' looks like TGH needed some backup and help!
Dont worry TGH! I know we were a bit too tough for you 1on1! With this move, i'm sure things will swing your way.
Ok i'm teasing/poking you a bit there. All is fair in love and war of course. But I have to admit I laughed when I saw another group jump us.
In truth OsRavan, I think IoM saw you as a weak target for some free loot and cash, nothing more and joined in for loot. -
Well done to everyone who fought in this war, my respect for what its worth to you all.
I see a lot of people who is not a member of the alliances listed complaining about the NAP, your alliance isn't listed so why you complaining ?. your not bound by this NAP.-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, LeotheGreat said:
Welcome to the new spin folks. They may have lost the stats war, but at least they are winning in deletions!
The only truth about your stats is the fact they are a lie, We all know those nations who deleted was removed from the stats even tho the damage they had taken still happened, I wonder if Alex even did some real stats posting if you will come back here delete your nation and claim life is unfair when you are proven nothing more than a simple liar who tried to play with the big boys and lost.
-
1
-
8
-
-
2 minutes ago, Keegoz said:
I am not salty, I am amused you've convinced yourself you're winning despite even your allies thinking differently.
This is a whole new level of delusion that I have yet to witness in this game. Cherry pick stats all you like, you aren't winning and nothing you can do will convince anyone else otherwise.
You've lost allies, the ones who could barely limp along you absorbed, some are getting to the point where they'll likely need to be absorbed (Hi GoG) and at the end of the day your rebuild will take twice as long as ours will. These stats have removed massive amounts of damage on our side but keep them if you want, even if they were true the notion that you won is a hilarious one that I'll let you continue to enjoy in your fantasy world.
The truth is any alliance that needs to keep posting stats have already lost, lets face it. We all know IQ will take longer to build, then they have to refund and build their allies well those that still remain, i foresee another big loan being taken out soon, NPO or BK wonder who the bank will be.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, LeotheGreat said:
smh you didn't read even literally the first page you dense motherfricker. BC should put a gag in your mouth they have been embarrassed enough this war.
Trust me, no one would be more embarrassed than to have anything to do with you, to please insult me all you wish it proves how simple minded you really are, lets face it one thing you are good at is fake news to make things look like your winning. would love for Alex to do the stats how i would laugh when it proves your full of it.
Non IA destroyed 5,191,234.46 you claim yet IQ lost 5,069,920.75 seems they do not add up, and you also forgot to add how many of your nations have ran/ deleted i am sure you removed their stats.
-
1
-
6
-
-
38 minutes ago, LeotheGreat said:
Wow a war stats thread by someone in IQ? Times sure have changed. This week IQ passed Rose/KT sphere in net damages and now are about 2.6 bil ahead.
Here's the wars broken down to an individual level across the entire conflict. Methodologies are described in the first page.
Glad to see steel at the right price, however Alu is only 2k not three.
Also hasn't IQ had 188 members leave/delete, that's one way to hide some of that infra lost as a deleted nations losses are not accounted for, wonder whats next ?
Seems IQ are also adding raids to their stats, Can prove this as they have added 300 Spartans to their sheet and he was in one raid that had nothing to do with IQ lol
Edit my post, not due to leo the big mouth worthless crap anything but great, simply because i had more to add, its still funny how they waited so long to change the price of steel, Also funny how they have lost 1m more infra than non iq yet the non iq side has paid what 3b more, @Alex are you giving IQ a discount on buying infra or are they just really bad at math's ?-
1
-
4
-
3
-
-
5 hours ago, Dio Brando said:
@ MoonShadow: I’m not even sure if you’re trolling now, because every time I see one of your posts, I lose brain cells. Keep the drivel that regularly manages to escape your mouth within it, please. You’re polluting the air.
Simply ignore me then and you would not lose any more brain cells, then again IQ simply do not have many to lose, so i beg you ignore me
3 hours ago, ForgotPants said:
Only because you do not agree, or do not like it, does not make it any less true.
-
5
-
-
11 hours ago, ForgotPants said:
We would have actually merged with NPO but we disagreed on the average steel price. I mean, that was the real deal breaker.
I swear I am not Roq.
Well i could understand that, NPO bought loads of steel to push the price over 5k ppu in order to make Roq stats look better, oddly enough its now down to 3.5k ppu again, i wonder if he changed the price accordingly if NPO and co would be doing as well as they claim ?
-
5
-
-
12 hours ago, Shadowthrone said:
Lol wtf. Getting multiple beiged by TGH/Rose during a war isn't abusing the system. He literally fought the war, got beiged and using the time to rebuild/hold cash. At least try to sound coherent lol.
unless you go back and read it, he clearly started he kept nuking to force them to beige him, a smart tactic i agree, this was so they could hide the alliance bank, now if there was no beige you better believe he would not have simply laid down and nuked as it does less damage to infra thank ships.
-
1
-
-
After this war IQ wouldn't be dead, nor will the non IQ side, the problem with most wars is you will find most alliances are pixel huggers and even if we have a 3rd side to this war they would join who they felt would win.
Not enough people pushing to be number one right now, I know BK has taken in Zodic and Connerstone and im sure it wont be long before TKR treaties with them out of fear or fight them out of fear.
War will live on as long as you all push for it -
Makes me wonder when will NPO merge in to BK as well, or will BK sort things out then merge in to NPO ?
-
4
-
-
12 hours ago, Who Me said:
lol You really are an idiot aren't you? The only way I paid anyone to beige me was by launching nukes and missiles at them until they either beiged me or I beiged them.
Nah not an idiot, just see things for what they are, you made sure that everyone beige you, YOU WILLING wanted to be beige in order to hold on to BK's bank, sure you might not have paid them but it does not change the point that you abused the beige in order to hide the bank.
-
14 hours ago, Who Me said:
This is what happens when you have a dev that doesn't play the game. He has no idea what is within the rules he keeps changing and what is not and keeps reacting to the biggest whiners because it inconveniences him. Maybe a better idea would be to start giving out warnings to the people that are trying to game you with all the whining?
If you are going to change stuff perhaps you should change the fact that you can still be spied on while in beige making it impossible to rebuild your spies an nukes.
The sad fact is, you have no idea what you are doing and just make huge swings from one perspective to the other instead of finding a middle ground.
You are the one that keeps creating these problems and then you !@#$ about it when the players adjust to your changes.
I guess some people make it worst when they abuse the system, I mean didn't you pay to be beiged so you could hold on to BK bank for the war? its things like this is why Beige should be removed, so alliances can not hide their bank in nations that can not be hit
-
On 11/04/2018 at 3:38 PM, Alex said:
I am sick of people toeing the line of war slot filling rules due to not wanting to Beige or being intentionally Beiged, and me having to moderate it. I am throwing this out here for suggestions, either Beige needs to be removed or nerfed, there can't be an incentive to "want to be beiged" or for real attackers to not want to Beige.
So either I am going to seriously increase the damage or remove Beige time from winning wars if someone doesn't have a better solution.
I am not sure if this is possible, Could you not add an effect that if attacking nation does not attack within 26 hours (as 24 hours give you maximum MAP) they lose 10% of their totally army, after all they did attack. and the count down timer reset's every time they attack.
As for the defending nation, this is a little tricky as most times a defending nation would be facing 3 people at any given time, but if they also do not re-buy max troops (clearly if they do not have the resources they can not) every day they suffer in damage taken by the attacking nation?
Another idea would be to base Resistance on the amount of damage done so lets say someone attacks and they kill 2k tanks and take zero damage by using planes, that should add 40% of the res, not sure if that is possible, same as if they do ground attack and lose 5k troops and 100 tanks by kills 10k troops and 200 tanks that could be 15% of res done, maybe something like that i know my numbers are off but just to give an idea. -
11 hours ago, Shadowthrone said:
I'd love to turn up, but all that effort for an alliance as crappy at war as yours, is just not worth the effort :3
Really that coming from the New Plane Order, simply laughable
-
49 minutes ago, LeotheGreat said:
Save the salt for the people killing you man.
Let me know when they turn up, still waiting.
Orbis, let's have a chat.
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
Damn it are still apart of it Monkey King